Kidney impairment post 177Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy in metastatic prostate cancer.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jesse Osbourne, Michael S Hofman, Irene Ruderman
{"title":"Kidney impairment post 177Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy in metastatic prostate cancer.","authors":"Jesse Osbourne, Michael S Hofman, Irene Ruderman","doi":"10.1097/MNM.0000000000002243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT) is a novel theranostic approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. It has been understood to have a low risk of mild nephrotoxicity, although the emergence of delayed or acute renal toxicity is variably described. The increasing use of PSMA-RLT as an earlier line of therapy has prompted a review of its renal safety. Given substantial heterogeneity in study design, follow-up, and outcome definitions, findings were synthesized narratively following the Synthesis without Meta-analysis guideline rather than pooled quantitatively. Studies were grouped by evidence hierarchy (randomized, prospective single-arm, retrospective/real-world, and case report/series) before synthesis. Risk of bias was assessed using design-appropriate tools (Cochrane Risk of Bias 2; a five-domain quality-scoring rubric; Joanna Briggs Institute principles for case reports). A review of 45 papers demonstrated mild nephrotoxicity (estimate glomerular filtration rate: 30-<90 mL/min/1.73m2) post-PSMA-RLT. Where chronic kidney disease (CKD) developed, it was either delayed in onset and progressive over time. There was broad heterogeneity of patient cohorts, methodologies, and data quality. In addition, there was limited long-term follow-up data regarding chronic nephrotoxicity, with only five studies having follow-up periods >12 months after the last treatment cycle. While incidence varied, the severity of renal impairment was commonly mild. The true rate of long-term renal injury is potentially underestimated as endpoints are inconsistently defined, baseline CKD risk is variably reported, and follow-up is often short. Future research with extended follow-up periods beyond 12 months is warranted to understand the true rate of CKD development.</p>","PeriodicalId":19708,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000002243","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT) is a novel theranostic approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. It has been understood to have a low risk of mild nephrotoxicity, although the emergence of delayed or acute renal toxicity is variably described. The increasing use of PSMA-RLT as an earlier line of therapy has prompted a review of its renal safety. Given substantial heterogeneity in study design, follow-up, and outcome definitions, findings were synthesized narratively following the Synthesis without Meta-analysis guideline rather than pooled quantitatively. Studies were grouped by evidence hierarchy (randomized, prospective single-arm, retrospective/real-world, and case report/series) before synthesis. Risk of bias was assessed using design-appropriate tools (Cochrane Risk of Bias 2; a five-domain quality-scoring rubric; Joanna Briggs Institute principles for case reports). A review of 45 papers demonstrated mild nephrotoxicity (estimate glomerular filtration rate: 30-<90 mL/min/1.73m2) post-PSMA-RLT. Where chronic kidney disease (CKD) developed, it was either delayed in onset and progressive over time. There was broad heterogeneity of patient cohorts, methodologies, and data quality. In addition, there was limited long-term follow-up data regarding chronic nephrotoxicity, with only five studies having follow-up periods >12 months after the last treatment cycle. While incidence varied, the severity of renal impairment was commonly mild. The true rate of long-term renal injury is potentially underestimated as endpoints are inconsistently defined, baseline CKD risk is variably reported, and follow-up is often short. Future research with extended follow-up periods beyond 12 months is warranted to understand the true rate of CKD development.

转移性前列腺癌放射配体治疗后肾损害。
前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)靶向放射配体治疗(RLT)是一种被批准用于治疗转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌的新疗法。虽然延迟性或急性肾毒性的出现有不同的描述,但已经理解为轻度肾毒性的风险很低。越来越多地使用PSMA-RLT作为早期的治疗方法,促使了对其肾脏安全性的审查。考虑到在研究设计、随访和结果定义上的巨大异质性,研究结果是按照无荟萃分析的综合指南进行叙述性综合,而不是定量汇总。研究在合成前按证据等级(随机、前瞻性单臂、回顾性/真实世界和病例报告/系列)分组。使用设计合适的工具评估偏倚风险(Cochrane Risk of bias 2;五域质量评分标准;乔安娜布里格斯研究所病例报告原则)。对45篇论文的回顾表明轻度肾毒性(估计肾小球滤过率:最后一个治疗周期后30-12个月)。虽然发病率不同,但肾脏损害的严重程度通常是轻微的。长期肾损伤的真实发生率可能被低估,因为终点的定义不一致,基线CKD风险的报告各不相同,而且随访时间通常很短。未来的研究有必要延长随访期超过12个月,以了解CKD发展的真实速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
212
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nuclear Medicine Communications, the official journal of the British Nuclear Medicine Society, is a rapid communications journal covering nuclear medicine and molecular imaging with radionuclides, and the basic supporting sciences. As well as clinical research and commentary, manuscripts describing research on preclinical and basic sciences (radiochemistry, radiopharmacy, radiobiology, radiopharmacology, medical physics, computing and engineering, and technical and nursing professions involved in delivering nuclear medicine services) are welcomed, as the journal is intended to be of interest internationally to all members of the many medical and non-medical disciplines involved in nuclear medicine. In addition to papers reporting original studies, frankly written editorials and topical reviews are a regular feature of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书