{"title":"Towards a sequencing framework for teaching and using self-enactable behaviour change techniques: a conceptual review and proposed approach.","authors":"Alexandre Mazéas, Nikos Ntoumanis","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2026.2737650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Self-enactable behaviour change techniques (BCTs) may help individuals initiate and sustain health behaviour change. However, existing taxonomies provide limited guidance on how such techniques should be selected, taught, combined, and sequenced over time. This perspective aimed to review previous approaches and to develop a conceptual framework for organising and sequencing self-enactable BCTs for intervention design and participant learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A critical conceptual review was conducted to identify published approaches to BCT grouping, temporal organisation, prerequisites, and stage-specific sequencing. Literature identified through four databases was synthesised alongside the compendium of self-enactable BCTs to inform a five-step framework-development process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review showed that existing taxonomies and sequencing approaches provide useful classifications but limited guidance for progressive teaching and self-enactment. To address this gap, we proposed a framework comprising 108 self-enactable BCTs organised into nine clusters and 27 groups. We mapped prerequisite relations, classified techniques by their predominant prospective or reactive function, and sequenced their groups across the Model of Action Phases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our framework provides a theory-informed structure for teaching and applying self-enactable BCTs. It is intended to guide intervention design and generate testable hypotheses about technique sequencing that need to be empirically explored in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-34"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2026.2737650","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Self-enactable behaviour change techniques (BCTs) may help individuals initiate and sustain health behaviour change. However, existing taxonomies provide limited guidance on how such techniques should be selected, taught, combined, and sequenced over time. This perspective aimed to review previous approaches and to develop a conceptual framework for organising and sequencing self-enactable BCTs for intervention design and participant learning.
Methods: A critical conceptual review was conducted to identify published approaches to BCT grouping, temporal organisation, prerequisites, and stage-specific sequencing. Literature identified through four databases was synthesised alongside the compendium of self-enactable BCTs to inform a five-step framework-development process.
Results: The review showed that existing taxonomies and sequencing approaches provide useful classifications but limited guidance for progressive teaching and self-enactment. To address this gap, we proposed a framework comprising 108 self-enactable BCTs organised into nine clusters and 27 groups. We mapped prerequisite relations, classified techniques by their predominant prospective or reactive function, and sequenced their groups across the Model of Action Phases.
Conclusion: Our framework provides a theory-informed structure for teaching and applying self-enactable BCTs. It is intended to guide intervention design and generate testable hypotheses about technique sequencing that need to be empirically explored in future studies.
期刊介绍:
Psychology & Health promotes the study and application of psychological approaches to health and illness. The contents include work on psychological aspects of physical illness, treatment processes and recovery; psychosocial factors in the aetiology of physical illnesses; health attitudes and behaviour, including prevention; the individual-health care system interface particularly communication and psychologically-based interventions. The journal publishes original research, and accepts not only papers describing rigorous empirical work, including meta-analyses, but also those outlining new psychological approaches and interventions in health-related fields.