PET/CT-based deep learning for differentiating squamous cell carcinoma from adenocarcinoma in non-small cell lung cancer: comparison of multimodal fusion strategies.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Gang Yan, Na Hu, Mengjuan Ran, Shuzhen Liu, Guijuan Han, Luying Xu, Rongmei Li, Qinghong Duan
{"title":"PET/CT-based deep learning for differentiating squamous cell carcinoma from adenocarcinoma in non-small cell lung cancer: comparison of multimodal fusion strategies.","authors":"Gang Yan, Na Hu, Mengjuan Ran, Shuzhen Liu, Guijuan Han, Luying Xu, Rongmei Li, Qinghong Duan","doi":"10.1097/MNM.0000000000002236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT)-based deep learning for differentiating squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) from adenocarcinoma (ADC) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to compare single-modality and multimodal fusion strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 220 patients with pathologically confirmed NSCLC (86 SqCC and 134 ADC) who underwent pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT. A 2.5D input strategy used the axial tumor slice with the largest mask area and its two adjacent slices. Four models were developed: PET-only, CT-only, PET/CT dual-branch fusion, and PET/CT six-channel early fusion. Performance was evaluated using five-fold stratified cross-validation with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, balanced accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PET-only model achieved higher mean AUC and MCC than the CT-only model. The PET/CT six-channel early fusion model achieved the highest mean AUC (0.766 ± 0.082), balanced accuracy (0.765 ± 0.071), specificity (0.882 ± 0.093), and MCC (0.530 ± 0.132). The dual-branch fusion model achieved the highest mean sensitivity (0.755 ± 0.144), although its mean AUC was lower than that of the PET-only model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PET/CT six-channel early fusion showed potential for differentiating ADC from SqCC and may provide complementary information for noninvasive histological assessment. External validation is required before clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":19708,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000002236","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT)-based deep learning for differentiating squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) from adenocarcinoma (ADC) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to compare single-modality and multimodal fusion strategies.

Methods: This retrospective study included 220 patients with pathologically confirmed NSCLC (86 SqCC and 134 ADC) who underwent pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT. A 2.5D input strategy used the axial tumor slice with the largest mask area and its two adjacent slices. Four models were developed: PET-only, CT-only, PET/CT dual-branch fusion, and PET/CT six-channel early fusion. Performance was evaluated using five-fold stratified cross-validation with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, balanced accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC).

Results: The PET-only model achieved higher mean AUC and MCC than the CT-only model. The PET/CT six-channel early fusion model achieved the highest mean AUC (0.766 ± 0.082), balanced accuracy (0.765 ± 0.071), specificity (0.882 ± 0.093), and MCC (0.530 ± 0.132). The dual-branch fusion model achieved the highest mean sensitivity (0.755 ± 0.144), although its mean AUC was lower than that of the PET-only model.

Conclusion: PET/CT six-channel early fusion showed potential for differentiating ADC from SqCC and may provide complementary information for noninvasive histological assessment. External validation is required before clinical application.

基于PET/ ct的深度学习在非小细胞肺癌中鉴别鳞状细胞癌与腺癌:多模式融合策略的比较
目的:本研究旨在评估基于18f -氟脱氧葡萄糖(18F-FDG) PET/计算机断层扫描(CT)的深度学习在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中鉴别鳞状细胞癌(SqCC)和腺癌(ADC)的效果,并比较单模态和多模态融合策略。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了220例病理确诊的非小细胞肺癌(86例SqCC, 134例ADC),均行18F-FDG PET/CT预处理。2.5D输入策略使用最大掩膜面积的轴向肿瘤切片及其相邻的两个切片。建立了四种模型:PET-only, CT-only, PET/CT双分支融合和PET/CT六通道早期融合。采用五重分层交叉验证的方法,包括受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、准确性、平衡准确性、敏感性、特异性、f1评分和马修斯相关系数(MCC)。结果:pet模型的平均AUC和MCC均高于ct模型。PET/CT六通道早期融合模型获得最高的平均AUC(0.766±0.082),平衡精度(0.765±0.071),特异性(0.882±0.093)和MCC(0.530±0.132)。双支融合模型的平均灵敏度最高(0.755±0.144),但其平均AUC低于pet模型。结论:PET/CT六通道早期融合显示了鉴别ADC和SqCC的潜力,并可为无创组织学评估提供补充信息。临床应用前需进行外部验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
212
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nuclear Medicine Communications, the official journal of the British Nuclear Medicine Society, is a rapid communications journal covering nuclear medicine and molecular imaging with radionuclides, and the basic supporting sciences. As well as clinical research and commentary, manuscripts describing research on preclinical and basic sciences (radiochemistry, radiopharmacy, radiobiology, radiopharmacology, medical physics, computing and engineering, and technical and nursing professions involved in delivering nuclear medicine services) are welcomed, as the journal is intended to be of interest internationally to all members of the many medical and non-medical disciplines involved in nuclear medicine. In addition to papers reporting original studies, frankly written editorials and topical reviews are a regular feature of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书