Integrated primary healthcare reform in Indonesia: Lessons learned from early community-level implementation.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Marwatunnisa Al Mubarokah, Hannah N Gilbert, Ari Probandari, Havivi Dwi Anggraeni, Rahayu Seffy Oktavia, Courtney M Yuen
{"title":"Integrated primary healthcare reform in Indonesia: Lessons learned from early community-level implementation.","authors":"Marwatunnisa Al Mubarokah, Hannah N Gilbert, Ari Probandari, Havivi Dwi Anggraeni, Rahayu Seffy Oktavia, Courtney M Yuen","doi":"10.1177/13558196261489144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesIn many low- and middle-income countries, comprehensive, first contact primary health care is fragmented by the delivery of centralized programs focused on specific health conditions. Indonesia's 2023 primary health care reform restructured community health services to provide integrated rather than condition-specific services, representing one of the broadest primary health care integration efforts in a middle-income country to date. We sought to understand the outcomes, barriers, and facilitators of early implementation of this reform.MethodsWe conducted a convergent mixed-method study in one of the first areas to implement primary health care reform. We used descriptive statistics to quantify service delivery outcomes from a survey of 14 village health facilities and data extracted from monthly reports from two village health facilities and 11 community health posts. We sought to understand barriers and facilitators to implementation via 24 patient interviews, seven key informant interviews, and four focus group discussions with healthcare providers. We used deductive-inductive qualitative analysis guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Findings were integrated to understand factors that impacted service delivery outcomes.ResultsIn the initial months of implementation, both health facilities and health posts offered integrated services to all patients simultaneously, but neither introduced new screening services (e.g., mental health) immediately. At health facilities, patient visits substantially increased across all age groups, with more modest changes seen at health posts. The convenience of getting services at community health posts increased patient visits, but scheduling incompatibility and a low sense of belonging were barriers to attendance for teenagers and working adults. Insufficient training, staff, and resources posed barriers to introducing new services.ConclusionsIt is possible for a middle-income country to move from condition-specific community health programs toward integrated primary health care. Doing so requires investment in human resources, intersectoral collaboration, and outreach to less engaged segments of the population.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"13558196261489144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196261489144","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesIn many low- and middle-income countries, comprehensive, first contact primary health care is fragmented by the delivery of centralized programs focused on specific health conditions. Indonesia's 2023 primary health care reform restructured community health services to provide integrated rather than condition-specific services, representing one of the broadest primary health care integration efforts in a middle-income country to date. We sought to understand the outcomes, barriers, and facilitators of early implementation of this reform.MethodsWe conducted a convergent mixed-method study in one of the first areas to implement primary health care reform. We used descriptive statistics to quantify service delivery outcomes from a survey of 14 village health facilities and data extracted from monthly reports from two village health facilities and 11 community health posts. We sought to understand barriers and facilitators to implementation via 24 patient interviews, seven key informant interviews, and four focus group discussions with healthcare providers. We used deductive-inductive qualitative analysis guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Findings were integrated to understand factors that impacted service delivery outcomes.ResultsIn the initial months of implementation, both health facilities and health posts offered integrated services to all patients simultaneously, but neither introduced new screening services (e.g., mental health) immediately. At health facilities, patient visits substantially increased across all age groups, with more modest changes seen at health posts. The convenience of getting services at community health posts increased patient visits, but scheduling incompatibility and a low sense of belonging were barriers to attendance for teenagers and working adults. Insufficient training, staff, and resources posed barriers to introducing new services.ConclusionsIt is possible for a middle-income country to move from condition-specific community health programs toward integrated primary health care. Doing so requires investment in human resources, intersectoral collaboration, and outreach to less engaged segments of the population.

印度尼西亚综合初级卫生保健改革:从早期社区一级实施中吸取的经验教训。
在许多低收入和中等收入国家,全面的、第一次接触初级卫生保健是分散的,因为提供的是针对特定健康状况的集中规划。印度尼西亚的《2023年初级卫生保健改革》对社区卫生服务进行了重组,以提供综合服务,而不是针对具体情况的服务,这是迄今为止中等收入国家中最广泛的初级卫生保健一体化努力之一。我们试图了解早期实施这一改革的结果、障碍和促进因素。方法我们在首批实施初级卫生保健改革的地区之一进行了一项融合混合方法研究。我们使用描述性统计来量化14个村庄卫生设施的服务提供结果,并从两个村庄卫生设施和11个社区卫生站的月度报告中提取数据。我们试图通过24个病人访谈、7个关键信息提供者访谈和4个与医疗保健提供者的焦点小组讨论来了解实施的障碍和促进因素。在实施研究统一框架的指导下,我们使用了演绎-归纳定性分析。对调查结果进行综合,以了解影响服务交付结果的因素。结果在实施的最初几个月,卫生设施和卫生站同时向所有患者提供综合服务,但都没有立即引入新的筛查服务(如心理健康)。在卫生设施,所有年龄组的病人就诊人数都大幅增加,卫生站的变化较为温和。在社区卫生站获得服务的便利性增加了病人的访问量,但日程安排不协调和归属感低是青少年和在职成年人就诊的障碍。培训、人员和资源不足对引进新服务构成障碍。结论中等收入国家有可能从因地制宜的社区卫生规划转向综合初级卫生保健。要做到这一点,需要对人力资源进行投资,开展部门间合作,并向参与程度较低的人群伸出援手。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Services Research & Policy provides a unique opportunity to explore the ideas, policies and decisions shaping health services throughout the world. Edited and peer-reviewed by experts in the field and with a high academic standard and multidisciplinary approach, readers will gain a greater understanding of the current issues in healthcare policy and research. The journal"s strong international editorial advisory board also ensures that readers obtain a truly global and insightful perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书