Pulsed Field Ablation Is Associated With Favorable Outcomes After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Insights From the Polish National Ablation Registry (POL-AR).

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-27 DOI:10.1111/jce.70514
Piotr Urbanek, Robert Bodalski, Michał Orczykowski, Ilona Kowalik, Andrzej Głowniak, Piotr Ponikowski, Oskar Kowalski, Paweł Derejko, Mariusz Pytkowski, Łukasz Szumowski
{"title":"Pulsed Field Ablation Is Associated With Favorable Outcomes After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Insights From the Polish National Ablation Registry (POL-AR).","authors":"Piotr Urbanek, Robert Bodalski, Michał Orczykowski, Ilona Kowalik, Andrzej Głowniak, Piotr Ponikowski, Oskar Kowalski, Paweł Derejko, Mariusz Pytkowski, Łukasz Szumowski","doi":"10.1111/jce.70514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Polish National Ablation Registry (POL-AR), mandatory for all centers performing catheter ablation and integrated with National Health Fund data, enables prospective analysis of a nationwide cohort with complete inclusion of all consecutive patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to assess real-world safety profiles and clinical outcomes of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation modalities-radiofrequency (RF), cryoballoon (CRYO), and pulsed-field ablation (PFA)-and to report the first-year PFA experience in Poland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All AF ablations in 2023 were prospectively analyzed in POL-AR and cross-referenced with National Health Fund data. Only centers with complete reporting were included. Patients were grouped by modality. Major complications, unplanned hospitalizations, cardioversions, repeat ablations, and deaths were assessed at 1 year. Multivariate analysis identified independent predictors of outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight centers reported 3430 patients (CRYO: 2125; RF: 1098; PFA: 207). Procedure time was longest for RF (median 120 min) versus CRYO (75 min) and PFA (65 min); (p < 0.001). No major complications occurred with PFA. Phrenic nerve injury persisted in 1.51% of CRYO, 0.09% of RF, and 0% of PFA patients (p < 0.001). Pericardial effusion was more frequent after RF (0.91% vs. 0.34% for CRYO + PFA; p = 0.032). Overall complication rates were lowest with PFA (0% vs. RF: 2.19%, CRYO: 2.59%). PFA patients required fewer cardioversions during follow-up (p = 0.017). Predictors of poor outcome included age, female sex, left atrium (LA) size, hypertension, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Favorable outcome was independently associated with higher left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), paroxysmal AF, and PFA use (HR 0.70, p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the POL-AR registry, PFA was independently associated with favorable outcomes after AF ablation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"2385-2392"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.70514","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Polish National Ablation Registry (POL-AR), mandatory for all centers performing catheter ablation and integrated with National Health Fund data, enables prospective analysis of a nationwide cohort with complete inclusion of all consecutive patients.

Objective: We aimed to assess real-world safety profiles and clinical outcomes of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation modalities-radiofrequency (RF), cryoballoon (CRYO), and pulsed-field ablation (PFA)-and to report the first-year PFA experience in Poland.

Methods: All AF ablations in 2023 were prospectively analyzed in POL-AR and cross-referenced with National Health Fund data. Only centers with complete reporting were included. Patients were grouped by modality. Major complications, unplanned hospitalizations, cardioversions, repeat ablations, and deaths were assessed at 1 year. Multivariate analysis identified independent predictors of outcomes.

Results: Twenty-eight centers reported 3430 patients (CRYO: 2125; RF: 1098; PFA: 207). Procedure time was longest for RF (median 120 min) versus CRYO (75 min) and PFA (65 min); (p < 0.001). No major complications occurred with PFA. Phrenic nerve injury persisted in 1.51% of CRYO, 0.09% of RF, and 0% of PFA patients (p < 0.001). Pericardial effusion was more frequent after RF (0.91% vs. 0.34% for CRYO + PFA; p = 0.032). Overall complication rates were lowest with PFA (0% vs. RF: 2.19%, CRYO: 2.59%). PFA patients required fewer cardioversions during follow-up (p = 0.017). Predictors of poor outcome included age, female sex, left atrium (LA) size, hypertension, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Favorable outcome was independently associated with higher left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), paroxysmal AF, and PFA use (HR 0.70, p = 0.04).

Conclusion: In the POL-AR registry, PFA was independently associated with favorable outcomes after AF ablation.

脉冲场消融与房颤消融后的良好预后相关:来自波兰国家消融登记(POL-AR)的见解
背景:波兰国家消融术登记(POL-AR)是所有进行导管消融术中心的强制性登记,并与国家卫生基金数据相结合,可以对全国队列进行前瞻性分析,完全纳入所有连续患者。目的:我们旨在评估心房颤动(AF)消融方式(射频(RF)、低温球囊(CRYO)和脉冲场消融(PFA))的真实世界安全性和临床结果,并报告波兰第一年的PFA经验。方法:对2023年所有房颤消融进行POL-AR前瞻性分析,并与国家卫生基金数据交叉参考。仅包括报告完整的中心。患者按模式分组。1年时评估主要并发症、计划外住院、心律转复、重复消融和死亡。多变量分析确定了结果的独立预测因素。结果:28个中心报告了3430例患者(CRYO: 2125; RF: 1098; PFA: 207)。手术时间最长的是RF(中位120分钟),而CRYO(75分钟)和PFA(65分钟);结论:在POL-AR登记中,PFA与房颤消融后的良好预后独立相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书