Genetic and cellular architecture of breast cancer risk across ancestries.

IF 4.8 Q2 ONCOLOGY
James L Li, Maria Zanti, Jacob Williams, Om Jahagirdar, Guochong Jia, Alistair Turcan, Qiang Hu, Jean-Tristan Brandenburg, Li Yan, Weang-Kee Ho, Jingmei Li, José Patricio Miranda, Devika Godbole, Julie-Alexia Dias, Xiaomeng Zhang, Leila Dorling, Wenlong Carl Chen, Nicholas Boddicker, Ying Wang, Alicia Martin, Yan Dora Zhang, Joe Dennis, Esther M John, Gabriela Torres-Mejia, Lawrence H Kushi, Jeffrey Weitzel, Susan L Neuhausen, Luis Carvajal-Carmona, Christopher Haiman, Elad Ziv, Laura Fejerman, Wei Zheng, Dezheng Huo, Douglas Easton, Stephen J Chanock, Nilanjan Chatterjee, Peter Kraft, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Wendy S W Wong, Kyriaki Michailidou, Qianqian Zhu, Martin Jinye Zhang, Diptavo Dutta, Thomas U Ahearn, Haoyu Zhang
{"title":"Genetic and cellular architecture of breast cancer risk across ancestries.","authors":"James L Li, Maria Zanti, Jacob Williams, Om Jahagirdar, Guochong Jia, Alistair Turcan, Qiang Hu, Jean-Tristan Brandenburg, Li Yan, Weang-Kee Ho, Jingmei Li, José Patricio Miranda, Devika Godbole, Julie-Alexia Dias, Xiaomeng Zhang, Leila Dorling, Wenlong Carl Chen, Nicholas Boddicker, Ying Wang, Alicia Martin, Yan Dora Zhang, Joe Dennis, Esther M John, Gabriela Torres-Mejia, Lawrence H Kushi, Jeffrey Weitzel, Susan L Neuhausen, Luis Carvajal-Carmona, Christopher Haiman, Elad Ziv, Laura Fejerman, Wei Zheng, Dezheng Huo, Douglas Easton, Stephen J Chanock, Nilanjan Chatterjee, Peter Kraft, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Wendy S W Wong, Kyriaki Michailidou, Qianqian Zhu, Martin Jinye Zhang, Diptavo Dutta, Thomas U Ahearn, Haoyu Zhang","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkag101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified more than 200 susceptibility loci, but most studies are dominated by European and East Asian populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed breast cancer GWAS summary statistics from African (AFR), East Asian (EAS), European (EUR), and Hispanic/Latina (H/L) samples (159,297 cases and 212,102 controls). We estimated logit-scale SNP-based heritability, polygenicity, and cross-ancestry genetic correlation, partitioned heritability across functional annotations, and integrated GWAS results with the Tabula Sapiens single-cell atlas using scDRS+.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The logit-scale heritability of breast cancer ranged from h2=0.47 (SE = 0.07) in EAS to AFR h2=0.61 (SE = 0.10), with no significant differences across ancestries (p = 0.63). The model-implied number of non-null susceptibility SNPs in the sparse normal-mixture effect-size model also varied from 4,446 (SE = 3,100) in EAS to 8,308 (SE = 2,751) in AFR, but differences were not significant across ancestries (p = 0.55). Cross-sample genetic correlations varied, with the strongest correlation between EUR and EAS (ρ=0.79, SE = 0.08) and weakest between AFR and H/L (ρ=0.26, SE = 0.24). Regulatory annotations were enriched for breast cancer heritability across samples. Integration with single-cell expression profiles implicated ancestry-shared associations with innate immune, secretory epithelial, and stromal cell types.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results indicate substantial cross-ancestry sharing of breast cancer polygenic architecture, highlight a consistent contribution of regulatory variation, and identify convergent cellular contexts that motivate functional follow-up and inform expectations for the transferability and attainable performance of common-variant risk prediction across populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkag101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified more than 200 susceptibility loci, but most studies are dominated by European and East Asian populations.

Methods: We analyzed breast cancer GWAS summary statistics from African (AFR), East Asian (EAS), European (EUR), and Hispanic/Latina (H/L) samples (159,297 cases and 212,102 controls). We estimated logit-scale SNP-based heritability, polygenicity, and cross-ancestry genetic correlation, partitioned heritability across functional annotations, and integrated GWAS results with the Tabula Sapiens single-cell atlas using scDRS+.

Results: The logit-scale heritability of breast cancer ranged from h2=0.47 (SE = 0.07) in EAS to AFR h2=0.61 (SE = 0.10), with no significant differences across ancestries (p = 0.63). The model-implied number of non-null susceptibility SNPs in the sparse normal-mixture effect-size model also varied from 4,446 (SE = 3,100) in EAS to 8,308 (SE = 2,751) in AFR, but differences were not significant across ancestries (p = 0.55). Cross-sample genetic correlations varied, with the strongest correlation between EUR and EAS (ρ=0.79, SE = 0.08) and weakest between AFR and H/L (ρ=0.26, SE = 0.24). Regulatory annotations were enriched for breast cancer heritability across samples. Integration with single-cell expression profiles implicated ancestry-shared associations with innate immune, secretory epithelial, and stromal cell types.

Conclusion: These results indicate substantial cross-ancestry sharing of breast cancer polygenic architecture, highlight a consistent contribution of regulatory variation, and identify convergent cellular contexts that motivate functional follow-up and inform expectations for the transferability and attainable performance of common-variant risk prediction across populations.

不同祖先乳腺癌风险的遗传和细胞结构。
背景:乳腺癌全基因组关联研究(GWAS)已经确定了200多个易感位点,但大多数研究以欧洲和东亚人群为主。方法:我们分析了来自非洲(AFR)、东亚(EAS)、欧洲(EUR)和西班牙/拉丁裔(H/L)样本(159,297例和212,102例对照)的乳腺癌GWAS汇总统计数据。我们估计了对数尺度的基于snp的遗传力、多基因性和跨祖先遗传相关性,划分了跨功能注释的遗传力,并使用scDRS+将GWAS结果与Tabula Sapiens单细胞图谱相结合。结果:乳腺癌的logit-scale遗传力范围为EAS组h2=0.47 (SE = 0.07)至AFR组h2=0.61 (SE = 0.10),不同祖先间无显著差异(p = 0.63)。在稀疏的正态混合效应大小模型中,模型隐含的非零易感性snp数也从EAS的4,446 (SE = 3,100)到AFR的8,308 (SE = 2,751)不等,但不同祖先之间的差异不显著(p = 0.55)。跨样本遗传相关性存在差异,EUR与EAS相关性最强(ρ=0.79, SE = 0.08), AFR与H/L相关性最弱(ρ=0.26, SE = 0.24)。在样本中丰富了乳腺癌遗传的调控注释。与单细胞表达谱的整合涉及与先天免疫、分泌上皮细胞和基质细胞类型的祖先共享关联。结论:这些结果表明,乳腺癌多基因结构具有实质性的跨祖先共享,突出了调控变异的一致贡献,并确定了促进功能随访的趋同细胞背景,并为跨人群的共同变异风险预测的可转移性和可实现的性能提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
JNCI Cancer Spectrum Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书