Co-Design of a Theory-Informed, Multicomponent, Intervention for Diagnostic Stewardship in a Major-Referral Emergency Department: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Vinay Gangathimmaiah, Rebecca Evans, Tarun Sen Gupta, Karen Carlisle
{"title":"Co-Design of a Theory-Informed, Multicomponent, Intervention for Diagnostic Stewardship in a Major-Referral Emergency Department: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.","authors":"Vinay Gangathimmaiah, Rebecca Evans, Tarun Sen Gupta, Karen Carlisle","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.70356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Low-value diagnostic tests harm patients. Stewardship of tests can improve patient safety. Co-design and behavioural change theories can enhance the effectiveness of diagnostic stewardship interventions. This study aimed to co-design a theory-informed diagnostic stewardship intervention at a major-referral emergency department in Queensland, Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted at Townsville University Hospital Emergency Department. The Theoretical Domains Framework underpinned intervention design. Emergency clinicians ordering pathology tests were eligible for inclusion. A purposive sample of consenting participants was recruited. Data were collected via workshops facilitated by the lead author. Conversations were audio recorded and digitally transcribed. Data were managed with NVivo. Data were analysed by inductive and deductive approaches to generate codes, categories and themes. Thematic saturation and optimal stakeholder engagement influenced the final sample size. Trustworthiness was ensured via reflexivity, audit trail, thick description and participant validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven workshops were conducted with 35 emergency physicians (18 male, 17 female) with a range of specialist experience (1-31 years). Urine culture was the diagnostic test of choice. Culture, complexity, and efficiency were identified as the major drivers of low-value urine cultures. Education, nudge, clinical champions, and audit/feedback were selected as intervention components. Credibility of change and workflow inefficiency were perceived as intervention challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stakeholder engagement has enhanced perceived acceptability of this co-designed intervention for urine culture diagnostic stewardship. Behavioural change theories strengthen co-designed interventions by addressing context-specific drivers of low-value tests. Co-design and behavioural change theories can inform bespoke interventions to nurture a culture of diagnostic stewardship in emergency medicine practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":"38 5","pages":"e70356"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13616993/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.70356","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Low-value diagnostic tests harm patients. Stewardship of tests can improve patient safety. Co-design and behavioural change theories can enhance the effectiveness of diagnostic stewardship interventions. This study aimed to co-design a theory-informed diagnostic stewardship intervention at a major-referral emergency department in Queensland, Australia.

Methods: A qualitative study was conducted at Townsville University Hospital Emergency Department. The Theoretical Domains Framework underpinned intervention design. Emergency clinicians ordering pathology tests were eligible for inclusion. A purposive sample of consenting participants was recruited. Data were collected via workshops facilitated by the lead author. Conversations were audio recorded and digitally transcribed. Data were managed with NVivo. Data were analysed by inductive and deductive approaches to generate codes, categories and themes. Thematic saturation and optimal stakeholder engagement influenced the final sample size. Trustworthiness was ensured via reflexivity, audit trail, thick description and participant validation.

Results: Seven workshops were conducted with 35 emergency physicians (18 male, 17 female) with a range of specialist experience (1-31 years). Urine culture was the diagnostic test of choice. Culture, complexity, and efficiency were identified as the major drivers of low-value urine cultures. Education, nudge, clinical champions, and audit/feedback were selected as intervention components. Credibility of change and workflow inefficiency were perceived as intervention challenges.

Conclusion: Stakeholder engagement has enhanced perceived acceptability of this co-designed intervention for urine culture diagnostic stewardship. Behavioural change theories strengthen co-designed interventions by addressing context-specific drivers of low-value tests. Co-design and behavioural change theories can inform bespoke interventions to nurture a culture of diagnostic stewardship in emergency medicine practice.

共同设计一个理论知情,多成分,干预诊断管理的主要转诊急诊科:定性描述性研究。
目的:探讨低价值诊断检测对患者的危害。对测试进行管理可以提高患者的安全。共同设计和行为改变理论可以提高诊断管理干预措施的有效性。本研究的目的是在澳大利亚昆士兰州的一个主要转诊急诊科共同设计一个理论知情的诊断管理干预。方法:在汤斯维尔大学医院急诊科进行定性研究。理论领域框架是干预设计的基础。要求进行病理检查的急诊临床医生符合入选条件。一个有目的的同意参与者样本被招募。数据是通过由第一作者主持的研讨会收集的。对话被录音并数字化转录。数据用NVivo处理。通过归纳和演绎方法对数据进行分析,生成代码、类别和主题。主题饱和度和最佳利益相关者参与影响最终样本量。通过自反性、审计跟踪、厚描述和参与者验证来确保可信度。结果:共有35名急诊医生(男18名,女17名)参加了7次讲习班,他们的专科经验范围(1-31岁)。尿培养是首选的诊断试验。培养、复杂性和效率被确定为低价值尿液培养的主要驱动因素。选择教育、推动、临床冠军和审计/反馈作为干预成分。变革的可信度和工作流程的低效率被认为是干预的挑战。结论:利益相关者的参与提高了这种共同设计的尿培养诊断管理干预措施的可接受性。行为改变理论通过解决低价值测试的具体背景驱动因素,加强了共同设计的干预措施。共同设计和行为改变理论可以为定制的干预措施提供信息,以培养急诊医学实践中的诊断管理文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Emergency Medicine Australasia 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine. Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书