Comprehensive evaluation of structural variation detection for germline and somatic analysis with long-read sequencing data.

IF 7.3 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Hua Shi, Yihang Lin, Dachen Liu, Hongfeng Wu, Ashidi Nor Mat Isa, Leyi Wei, Quan Zou, Xiang Chen
{"title":"Comprehensive evaluation of structural variation detection for germline and somatic analysis with long-read sequencing data.","authors":"Hua Shi, Yihang Lin, Dachen Liu, Hongfeng Wu, Ashidi Nor Mat Isa, Leyi Wei, Quan Zou, Xiang Chen","doi":"10.1093/bib/bbag530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Detecting structural variations (SVs) via long-read sequencing remains difficult due to algorithmic variations and genomic complexity, alongside a shortage of comprehensive benchmarks for somatic variants. We present a unified benchmarking framework covering both germline and somatic SV detection, which evaluates 14 long-read callers across 20 core datasets from Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) Continuous Long Reads (CLR), Circular Consensus Sequencing (CCS), and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) platforms. Performance was analyzed across 12 dimensions using metrics including baseline artefact rate, Mendelian discordance rate (MDR), and Mendelian inheritance error rate (MIER). For germline SVs, DeBreak, cuteSV2, and SVDF showed stable and accurate detection. cuteSV2 and SVHunter maintained consistent genotyping accuracy across sequencing depths, whereas Severus and cuteSV2 performed well in identifying complex SVs such as inversions, duplications, and translocations. In tumor datasets, tools designed specifically for somatic SVs outperformed germline callers. Severus and SAVANA showed strong overall somatic performance, and nanomonsv showed distinct advantages at low coverage. These results offer practical references for tool selection under various sequencing scenarios, supporting future algorithmic development. The code and resources are available at https://github.com/model-lab/LR-SV-Benchmark.</p>","PeriodicalId":9209,"journal":{"name":"Briefings in bioinformatics","volume":"27 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13617575/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Briefings in bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbag530","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Detecting structural variations (SVs) via long-read sequencing remains difficult due to algorithmic variations and genomic complexity, alongside a shortage of comprehensive benchmarks for somatic variants. We present a unified benchmarking framework covering both germline and somatic SV detection, which evaluates 14 long-read callers across 20 core datasets from Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) Continuous Long Reads (CLR), Circular Consensus Sequencing (CCS), and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) platforms. Performance was analyzed across 12 dimensions using metrics including baseline artefact rate, Mendelian discordance rate (MDR), and Mendelian inheritance error rate (MIER). For germline SVs, DeBreak, cuteSV2, and SVDF showed stable and accurate detection. cuteSV2 and SVHunter maintained consistent genotyping accuracy across sequencing depths, whereas Severus and cuteSV2 performed well in identifying complex SVs such as inversions, duplications, and translocations. In tumor datasets, tools designed specifically for somatic SVs outperformed germline callers. Severus and SAVANA showed strong overall somatic performance, and nanomonsv showed distinct advantages at low coverage. These results offer practical references for tool selection under various sequencing scenarios, supporting future algorithmic development. The code and resources are available at https://github.com/model-lab/LR-SV-Benchmark.

利用长读测序数据对种系和体细胞分析的结构变异检测进行综合评价。
由于算法差异和基因组复杂性,以及缺乏体细胞变异的综合基准,通过长读测序检测结构变异(SVs)仍然很困难。我们提出了一个涵盖生殖系和体细胞SV检测的统一基准框架,该框架评估了来自太平洋生物科学公司(PacBio)连续长读(CLR)、循环共识测序(CCS)和牛津纳米孔技术公司(ONT)平台的20个核心数据集中的14个长读调用者。使用基准伪象率、孟德尔不协调率(MDR)和孟德尔遗传错误率(MIER)等指标分析了12个维度的性能。对于种系SVs, DeBreak、cuteSV2和SVDF检测稳定、准确。cuteSV2和SVHunter在测序深度上保持一致的基因分型准确性,而Severus和cuteSV2在识别反转、重复和易位等复杂SVs方面表现良好。在肿瘤数据集中,专门为体细胞sv设计的工具优于种系呼叫者。在低盖度条件下,塞弗拉斯和萨凡纳表现出较强的整体体细胞性能,纳蒙纳表现出明显的优势。这些结果为各种测序场景下的工具选择提供了实用参考,为未来的算法开发提供了支持。代码和资源可在https://github.com/model-lab/LR-SV-Benchmark上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Briefings in bioinformatics
Briefings in bioinformatics 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
13.70%
发文量
549
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Briefings in Bioinformatics is an international journal serving as a platform for researchers and educators in the life sciences. It also appeals to mathematicians, statisticians, and computer scientists applying their expertise to biological challenges. The journal focuses on reviews tailored for users of databases and analytical tools in contemporary genetics, molecular and systems biology. It stands out by offering practical assistance and guidance to non-specialists in computerized methodologies. Covering a wide range from introductory concepts to specific protocols and analyses, the papers address bacterial, plant, fungal, animal, and human data. The journal's detailed subject areas include genetic studies of phenotypes and genotypes, mapping, DNA sequencing, expression profiling, gene expression studies, microarrays, alignment methods, protein profiles and HMMs, lipids, metabolic and signaling pathways, structure determination and function prediction, phylogenetic studies, and education and training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书