Hua Shi, Yihang Lin, Dachen Liu, Hongfeng Wu, Ashidi Nor Mat Isa, Leyi Wei, Quan Zou, Xiang Chen
{"title":"Comprehensive evaluation of structural variation detection for germline and somatic analysis with long-read sequencing data.","authors":"Hua Shi, Yihang Lin, Dachen Liu, Hongfeng Wu, Ashidi Nor Mat Isa, Leyi Wei, Quan Zou, Xiang Chen","doi":"10.1093/bib/bbag530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Detecting structural variations (SVs) via long-read sequencing remains difficult due to algorithmic variations and genomic complexity, alongside a shortage of comprehensive benchmarks for somatic variants. We present a unified benchmarking framework covering both germline and somatic SV detection, which evaluates 14 long-read callers across 20 core datasets from Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) Continuous Long Reads (CLR), Circular Consensus Sequencing (CCS), and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) platforms. Performance was analyzed across 12 dimensions using metrics including baseline artefact rate, Mendelian discordance rate (MDR), and Mendelian inheritance error rate (MIER). For germline SVs, DeBreak, cuteSV2, and SVDF showed stable and accurate detection. cuteSV2 and SVHunter maintained consistent genotyping accuracy across sequencing depths, whereas Severus and cuteSV2 performed well in identifying complex SVs such as inversions, duplications, and translocations. In tumor datasets, tools designed specifically for somatic SVs outperformed germline callers. Severus and SAVANA showed strong overall somatic performance, and nanomonsv showed distinct advantages at low coverage. These results offer practical references for tool selection under various sequencing scenarios, supporting future algorithmic development. The code and resources are available at https://github.com/model-lab/LR-SV-Benchmark.</p>","PeriodicalId":9209,"journal":{"name":"Briefings in bioinformatics","volume":"27 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13617575/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Briefings in bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbag530","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Detecting structural variations (SVs) via long-read sequencing remains difficult due to algorithmic variations and genomic complexity, alongside a shortage of comprehensive benchmarks for somatic variants. We present a unified benchmarking framework covering both germline and somatic SV detection, which evaluates 14 long-read callers across 20 core datasets from Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) Continuous Long Reads (CLR), Circular Consensus Sequencing (CCS), and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) platforms. Performance was analyzed across 12 dimensions using metrics including baseline artefact rate, Mendelian discordance rate (MDR), and Mendelian inheritance error rate (MIER). For germline SVs, DeBreak, cuteSV2, and SVDF showed stable and accurate detection. cuteSV2 and SVHunter maintained consistent genotyping accuracy across sequencing depths, whereas Severus and cuteSV2 performed well in identifying complex SVs such as inversions, duplications, and translocations. In tumor datasets, tools designed specifically for somatic SVs outperformed germline callers. Severus and SAVANA showed strong overall somatic performance, and nanomonsv showed distinct advantages at low coverage. These results offer practical references for tool selection under various sequencing scenarios, supporting future algorithmic development. The code and resources are available at https://github.com/model-lab/LR-SV-Benchmark.
期刊介绍:
Briefings in Bioinformatics is an international journal serving as a platform for researchers and educators in the life sciences. It also appeals to mathematicians, statisticians, and computer scientists applying their expertise to biological challenges. The journal focuses on reviews tailored for users of databases and analytical tools in contemporary genetics, molecular and systems biology. It stands out by offering practical assistance and guidance to non-specialists in computerized methodologies. Covering a wide range from introductory concepts to specific protocols and analyses, the papers address bacterial, plant, fungal, animal, and human data.
The journal's detailed subject areas include genetic studies of phenotypes and genotypes, mapping, DNA sequencing, expression profiling, gene expression studies, microarrays, alignment methods, protein profiles and HMMs, lipids, metabolic and signaling pathways, structure determination and function prediction, phylogenetic studies, and education and training.