Nasal Cavity Dimensions and Pharyngeal Airway Space in Simple Snoring: A Cross-Sectional CT-Based Study.

IF 2.4
Jeong-Whun Kim, Sung-Woo Cho, Hyun Jung Kim
{"title":"Nasal Cavity Dimensions and Pharyngeal Airway Space in Simple Snoring: A Cross-Sectional CT-Based Study.","authors":"Jeong-Whun Kim, Sung-Woo Cho, Hyun Jung Kim","doi":"10.3390/medicina62091798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background and Objectives:</i> The anatomical relationship between nasal cavity dimensions and the pharyngeal airway space (PAS) in simple snoring remains poorly defined. We investigated the association between nasal cavity dimensions and the PAS in adults with simple snoring using computed tomography (CT), focusing on anatomical correlations. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: This cross-sectional study included 83 adults with simple snoring and nasal obstruction and a confirmed apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) < 2, enrolled between 2007 and 2022. Polysomnography and CT were performed to measure nasal and pharyngeal airway dimensions. The minimum cross-sectional areas (mCSAs) of three nasal cavity segments and pharyngeal airway dimensions were measured on awake CT images. Multivariable linear regression, adjusted for age, sex, and BMI, was used to evaluate the association between the nasal and pharyngeal airway dimensions. <i>Results:</i> A larger bilateral narrowest nasal cross-sectional area was significantly associated with a larger PAS mCSA in the full cohort (standardized β = 0.26, <i>p</i> = 0.012), after adjustment for age, sex, and BMI. A 10-mm<sup>2</sup> larger nasal area corresponded to a 3.6% larger PAS mCSA (95% CI, 0.8-6.5%), and the model explained a modest share of the variance (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.17). The association did not differ by sex (interaction <i>p</i> = 0.25), indicating no evidence of effect modification. <i>Conclusions:</i> In individuals with simple snoring, smaller nasal cavity dimensions were associated with a narrower PAS on static CT imaging, although this association was modest and explained only a small fraction of the variation in pharyngeal calibre. These findings reflect anatomical associations and should not be interpreted as evidence of functional airway collapse or disease progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":520709,"journal":{"name":"Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)","volume":"62 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13609348/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62091798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The anatomical relationship between nasal cavity dimensions and the pharyngeal airway space (PAS) in simple snoring remains poorly defined. We investigated the association between nasal cavity dimensions and the PAS in adults with simple snoring using computed tomography (CT), focusing on anatomical correlations. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study included 83 adults with simple snoring and nasal obstruction and a confirmed apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) < 2, enrolled between 2007 and 2022. Polysomnography and CT were performed to measure nasal and pharyngeal airway dimensions. The minimum cross-sectional areas (mCSAs) of three nasal cavity segments and pharyngeal airway dimensions were measured on awake CT images. Multivariable linear regression, adjusted for age, sex, and BMI, was used to evaluate the association between the nasal and pharyngeal airway dimensions. Results: A larger bilateral narrowest nasal cross-sectional area was significantly associated with a larger PAS mCSA in the full cohort (standardized β = 0.26, p = 0.012), after adjustment for age, sex, and BMI. A 10-mm2 larger nasal area corresponded to a 3.6% larger PAS mCSA (95% CI, 0.8-6.5%), and the model explained a modest share of the variance (adjusted R2 = 0.17). The association did not differ by sex (interaction p = 0.25), indicating no evidence of effect modification. Conclusions: In individuals with simple snoring, smaller nasal cavity dimensions were associated with a narrower PAS on static CT imaging, although this association was modest and explained only a small fraction of the variation in pharyngeal calibre. These findings reflect anatomical associations and should not be interpreted as evidence of functional airway collapse or disease progression.

单纯性打鼾的鼻腔尺寸和咽气道空间:一项基于横断面ct的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书