BIOMECHANICAL STUDY OF PULLOUT RESISTANCE OF CORTICAL SCREWS IN SWINE LUMBAR VERTEBRAE.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Acta Ortopedica Brasileira Pub Date : 2026-09-25 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1413-785220263402e297893
Rogério Lúcio Chaves de Resende, Jefferson Soares Leal, Jefferson J Vilela, Renato de Mello Guimarães, Ângelo Ribeiro Vaz de Faria, Marco Antônio Percope de Andrade
{"title":"BIOMECHANICAL STUDY OF PULLOUT RESISTANCE OF CORTICAL SCREWS IN SWINE LUMBAR VERTEBRAE.","authors":"Rogério Lúcio Chaves de Resende, Jefferson Soares Leal, Jefferson J Vilela, Renato de Mello Guimarães, Ângelo Ribeiro Vaz de Faria, Marco Antônio Percope de Andrade","doi":"10.1590/1413-785220263402e297893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the mechanical resistance to pullout of the lumbar cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw with and without transfixation of the second cortical in a biomechanical assay in swine vertebrae.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pullout test was performed in 16 swine vertebrae (L5 and L6) fixed with 32 CBT screws using the same protocol. Of these, 16 were inserted in a monocortical manner according to the original technique and 16 through a modified technique which included the transfixation of the second cortical bone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average maximum load value for pulling out the inserted screws with the modified technique including the transfixation of the second cortical bone was 140.50 Kgf (± 56.56), while in the original technique it was 95.69 Kgf (± 42.19) (p = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The biomechanical tests applied to the studied sample showed that the pullout resistance of the CBT screws inserted with the bicortical technique was, on average, 46% higher than the screws inserted according to the original monocortical technique. <b>Level of Evidence II; Experimental study.</b></p>","PeriodicalId":55563,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","volume":"34 spe2","pages":"e297893"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13614723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220263402e297893","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the mechanical resistance to pullout of the lumbar cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw with and without transfixation of the second cortical in a biomechanical assay in swine vertebrae.

Methods: A pullout test was performed in 16 swine vertebrae (L5 and L6) fixed with 32 CBT screws using the same protocol. Of these, 16 were inserted in a monocortical manner according to the original technique and 16 through a modified technique which included the transfixation of the second cortical bone.

Results: The average maximum load value for pulling out the inserted screws with the modified technique including the transfixation of the second cortical bone was 140.50 Kgf (± 56.56), while in the original technique it was 95.69 Kgf (± 42.19) (p = 0.004).

Conclusion: The biomechanical tests applied to the studied sample showed that the pullout resistance of the CBT screws inserted with the bicortical technique was, on average, 46% higher than the screws inserted according to the original monocortical technique. Level of Evidence II; Experimental study.

猪腰椎皮质螺钉抗拔的生物力学研究。
简介:本研究旨在通过猪椎骨的生物力学试验,评估有和没有穿固定第二皮质的腰椎皮质骨轨迹(CBT)螺钉拔出的机械阻力。方法:采用相同的方案,用32枚CBT螺钉固定16根猪椎体(L5和L6),进行拉出试验。其中,16例按照原始技术以单皮质方式插入,16例通过一种改进的技术,包括穿透第二皮质骨。结果:改良技术包括第二皮质骨内穿固定的内钉拔出的平均最大载荷值为140.50 Kgf(±56.56),而原始技术为95.69 Kgf(±42.19)(p = 0.004)。结论:应用于研究样本的生物力学试验表明,采用双皮质技术置入CBT螺钉的拔出阻力平均比采用原始单皮质技术置入的螺钉高46%。证据水平II;实验研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
67
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: A Revista Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, órgão oficial do Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (DOT/FMUSP), é publicada bimestralmente em seis edições ao ano (jan/fev, mar/abr, maio/jun, jul/ago, set/out e nov/dez) com versão em inglês disponível nos principais indexadores nacionais e internacionais e instituições de ensino do Brasil. Sendo hoje reconhecidamente uma importante contribuição para os especialistas da área com sua seriedade e árduo trabalho para as indexações já conquistadas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书