Implementing a National Lifestyle Medicine Residency Curriculum: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Learning, Behavior Change, and Clinical Integration.

IF 1.9 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Shanna L Mello
{"title":"Implementing a National Lifestyle Medicine Residency Curriculum: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Learning, Behavior Change, and Clinical Integration.","authors":"Shanna L Mello","doi":"10.1177/15598276261491654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To evaluate the impact of a national lifestyle medicine residency curriculum (LMRC) on resident knowledge, confidence, and clinical behaviors, and to examine factors influencing implementation in real-world training environments. <b>Methods:</b> A convergent mixed-methods design was used. Quantitative analyses included pre- and post-curriculum survey data from 148 residents across multiple specialties, analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 15 residents and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Findings were integrated using a side-by-side comparison approach guided by Kirkpatrick's evaluation model. <b>Results:</b> Residents demonstrated significant improvements in lifestyle medicine knowledge, confidence, and frequency of counseling behaviors across all domains (<i>P</i> < .001), with moderate to large effect sizes. Qualitative findings revealed that residents integrated lifestyle medicine into clinical practice through brief counseling strategies, goal-setting techniques, and the use of practical tools such as electronic health record prompts and patient education resources. Reported facilitators included faculty support and workflow integration, while barriers included time constraints, documentation burden, and variability in local resources. Residents also described early patient-level improvements, including enhanced engagement and clinical indicators. <b>Conclusions:</b> A structured lifestyle medicine curriculum was associated with meaningful improvements in resident competencies and clinical practice behaviors. Successful implementation depended on integration into clinical workflows and supportive training environments. These findings provide actionable insights for scaling lifestyle medicine education across graduate medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":47480,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"15598276261491654"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13612761/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15598276261491654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of a national lifestyle medicine residency curriculum (LMRC) on resident knowledge, confidence, and clinical behaviors, and to examine factors influencing implementation in real-world training environments. Methods: A convergent mixed-methods design was used. Quantitative analyses included pre- and post-curriculum survey data from 148 residents across multiple specialties, analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 15 residents and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Findings were integrated using a side-by-side comparison approach guided by Kirkpatrick's evaluation model. Results: Residents demonstrated significant improvements in lifestyle medicine knowledge, confidence, and frequency of counseling behaviors across all domains (P < .001), with moderate to large effect sizes. Qualitative findings revealed that residents integrated lifestyle medicine into clinical practice through brief counseling strategies, goal-setting techniques, and the use of practical tools such as electronic health record prompts and patient education resources. Reported facilitators included faculty support and workflow integration, while barriers included time constraints, documentation burden, and variability in local resources. Residents also described early patient-level improvements, including enhanced engagement and clinical indicators. Conclusions: A structured lifestyle medicine curriculum was associated with meaningful improvements in resident competencies and clinical practice behaviors. Successful implementation depended on integration into clinical workflows and supportive training environments. These findings provide actionable insights for scaling lifestyle medicine education across graduate medical education.

实施国家生活方式医学住院医师课程:学习、行为改变和临床整合的混合方法评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.80%
发文量
119
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书