Accelerating equitable cancer genomics and precision oncology in health care and research: a Lancet Oncology Commission.

IF 33.7 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Lancet Oncology Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-25 DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(26)00302-5
Raffaella Casolino, Joaquin Mateo, Elisabeth G E de Vries, Amber Johns, Melanie Courtot, Rita T Lawlor, Sandra Perdomo, Stacy W Gray, Raquel Perez-Lopez, Clare Turnbull, David Torrents, Kerstin Noelle Vokinger, Dilara Akhoundova, Jean-Marc Bourque, Andrés F Cardona, Yoon Jung Chang, Debyani Chakravarty, Ievgeniia Chicherova, Karen Ann Cranston, Melissa Davis, Amanda Drury, Oskar Frisell, Raquel Manzano Garcia, Robert L Grossman, Yosr Hamdi, Simon Hediger, Thomas Hofmarcher, Oliver Hofmann, Jakob Nikolas Kather, Hannah Kim, Kazuto Kato, Bartha Maria Knoppers, Kjong-Van Lehmann, Dilani Lokuhetty, Patricia M LoRusso, Deborah Mascalzoni, Nicola Mulder, Travis Osterman, Folakemi Odedina, Aparna R Parikh, Solomon Rotimi, Brian Rous, Shawn Sweeney, Bhawna Sirohi, Zbyslaw Sondka, Ciara Staunton, Kjetil Taskén, Alex Wagner, C Benedikt Westphalen, Jianmin Wu, Joly Yann, Ma'n H Zawati, Andrew V Biankin, Takayuki Yoshino, Lincoln Stein, Mark Lawler
{"title":"Accelerating equitable cancer genomics and precision oncology in health care and research: a Lancet Oncology Commission.","authors":"Raffaella Casolino, Joaquin Mateo, Elisabeth G E de Vries, Amber Johns, Melanie Courtot, Rita T Lawlor, Sandra Perdomo, Stacy W Gray, Raquel Perez-Lopez, Clare Turnbull, David Torrents, Kerstin Noelle Vokinger, Dilara Akhoundova, Jean-Marc Bourque, Andrés F Cardona, Yoon Jung Chang, Debyani Chakravarty, Ievgeniia Chicherova, Karen Ann Cranston, Melissa Davis, Amanda Drury, Oskar Frisell, Raquel Manzano Garcia, Robert L Grossman, Yosr Hamdi, Simon Hediger, Thomas Hofmarcher, Oliver Hofmann, Jakob Nikolas Kather, Hannah Kim, Kazuto Kato, Bartha Maria Knoppers, Kjong-Van Lehmann, Dilani Lokuhetty, Patricia M LoRusso, Deborah Mascalzoni, Nicola Mulder, Travis Osterman, Folakemi Odedina, Aparna R Parikh, Solomon Rotimi, Brian Rous, Shawn Sweeney, Bhawna Sirohi, Zbyslaw Sondka, Ciara Staunton, Kjetil Taskén, Alex Wagner, C Benedikt Westphalen, Jianmin Wu, Joly Yann, Ma'n H Zawati, Andrew V Biankin, Takayuki Yoshino, Lincoln Stein, Mark Lawler","doi":"10.1016/S1470-2045(26)00302-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cancer genomics and precision oncology are increasingly central to cancer care, but many health systems struggle to implement them equitably, effectively, and sustainably. This Commission defines the current global precision oncology landscape and analyses the scientific, structural, and health-system challenges shaping its delivery and impact. Findings indicate that access to cancer genomics and precision oncology remains profoundly unequal across and within countries, leaving millions of patients without guideline-indicated interventions each year. These disparities extend to research, with genomic studies and clinical trials concentrated in high-income settings and among populations of predominantly European ancestry. At the same time, fragmented and poorly integrated data ecosystems restrict evidence generation, knowledge sharing, and clinical impact. Beyond questions of access and implementation, the clinical benefit of precision oncology is highly heterogeneous. The greatest and most consistent gains are confined to a few well validated biomarker-treatment pairings, typically supported by companion diagnostics; broader approaches such as comprehensive genomic profiling and tumour-agnostic strategies, might expand options for selected patients, but only a few patients receiving matched therapy derive meaningful benefit. The Commission also identifies a paradox of success: rapid expansion of precision oncology has increased cognitive, organisational, data, workforce, and financial burdens, while evidence of broad population-level benefit has lagged behind. In response, the Commission offers a comprehensive and context-responsive approach for integrating cancer genomics and precision oncology into health systems effectively, equitably, and sustainably. The Commission developed a value-based resource-stratified implementation framework, a system-readiness assessment tool, a precision oncology workforce competency-based framework, a precision oncology monitoring and evaluation framework, and principles for responsible data sharing and health-system learning. Cancer genomics and precision oncology can improve outcomes and strengthen health systems if scaled equitably, sustainably, and according to evidence, public value, national context, and patient needs. This Commission offers a basis for global consensus on a more equitable, evidence-informed, and sustainable path forward.</p>","PeriodicalId":17942,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"e454-e507"},"PeriodicalIF":33.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(26)00302-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cancer genomics and precision oncology are increasingly central to cancer care, but many health systems struggle to implement them equitably, effectively, and sustainably. This Commission defines the current global precision oncology landscape and analyses the scientific, structural, and health-system challenges shaping its delivery and impact. Findings indicate that access to cancer genomics and precision oncology remains profoundly unequal across and within countries, leaving millions of patients without guideline-indicated interventions each year. These disparities extend to research, with genomic studies and clinical trials concentrated in high-income settings and among populations of predominantly European ancestry. At the same time, fragmented and poorly integrated data ecosystems restrict evidence generation, knowledge sharing, and clinical impact. Beyond questions of access and implementation, the clinical benefit of precision oncology is highly heterogeneous. The greatest and most consistent gains are confined to a few well validated biomarker-treatment pairings, typically supported by companion diagnostics; broader approaches such as comprehensive genomic profiling and tumour-agnostic strategies, might expand options for selected patients, but only a few patients receiving matched therapy derive meaningful benefit. The Commission also identifies a paradox of success: rapid expansion of precision oncology has increased cognitive, organisational, data, workforce, and financial burdens, while evidence of broad population-level benefit has lagged behind. In response, the Commission offers a comprehensive and context-responsive approach for integrating cancer genomics and precision oncology into health systems effectively, equitably, and sustainably. The Commission developed a value-based resource-stratified implementation framework, a system-readiness assessment tool, a precision oncology workforce competency-based framework, a precision oncology monitoring and evaluation framework, and principles for responsible data sharing and health-system learning. Cancer genomics and precision oncology can improve outcomes and strengthen health systems if scaled equitably, sustainably, and according to evidence, public value, national context, and patient needs. This Commission offers a basis for global consensus on a more equitable, evidence-informed, and sustainable path forward.

在卫生保健和研究中加速公平的癌症基因组学和精确肿瘤学:柳叶刀肿瘤学委员会。
癌症基因组学和精确肿瘤学日益成为癌症治疗的核心,但许多卫生系统难以公平、有效和可持续地实施它们。该委员会定义了当前全球精确肿瘤学的前景,并分析了影响其提供和影响的科学、结构和卫生系统挑战。研究结果表明,各国之间和各国内部获得癌症基因组学和精确肿瘤学的机会仍然极不平等,每年有数百万患者无法获得指南所指示的干预措施。这些差异延伸到研究领域,基因组研究和临床试验集中在高收入环境和以欧洲血统为主的人群中。与此同时,支离破碎且整合不良的数据生态系统限制了证据生成、知识共享和临床影响。除了获取和实施的问题之外,精准肿瘤学的临床效益是高度异质性的。最大和最一致的收益仅限于少数经过充分验证的生物标志物-治疗配对,通常由伴随诊断支持;更广泛的方法,如全面的基因组分析和肿瘤不确定策略,可能会扩大选定患者的选择,但只有少数接受匹配治疗的患者获得有意义的益处。委员会还发现了一个成功的悖论:精准肿瘤学的快速扩张增加了认知、组织、数据、劳动力和财政负担,而广泛人群水平的益处的证据却滞后。作为回应,委员会提供了一种全面和根据具体情况作出反应的方法,以便将癌症基因组学和精确肿瘤学有效、公平和可持续地纳入卫生系统。委员会制定了一个基于价值的资源分层实施框架、一个系统准备评估工具、一个基于精确肿瘤学工作人员能力的框架、一个精确肿瘤学监测和评估框架,以及负责任的数据共享和卫生系统学习原则。如果按照证据、公共价值、国家国情和患者需求公平、可持续地扩大规模,癌症基因组学和精准肿瘤学可以改善结果并加强卫生系统。该委员会为全球就更公平、循证和可持续的前进道路达成共识奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lancet Oncology
Lancet Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
62.10
自引率
1.00%
发文量
913
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Oncology is a trusted international journal that addresses various topics in clinical practice, health policy, and global oncology. It covers a wide range of cancer types, including breast, endocrine system, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, gynaecological, haematological, head and neck, neurooncology, paediatric, thoracic, sarcoma, and skin cancers. Additionally, it includes articles on epidemiology, cancer prevention and control, supportive care, imaging, and health-care systems. The journal has an Impact Factor of 51.1, making it the leading clinical oncology research journal worldwide. It publishes different types of articles, such as Articles, Reviews, Policy Reviews, Personal Views, Clinical Pictures, Comments, Correspondence, News, and Perspectives. The Lancet Oncology also collaborates with societies, governments, NGOs, and academic centers to publish Series and Commissions that aim to drive positive changes in clinical practice and health policy in areas of global oncology that require attention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书