Insights into X-linked Dystonia-Parkinsonism and Spinocerebellar Ataxia type 36 Through the Lens of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/Frontotemporal Dementia.

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Mansee Patel, Soumalya Das, Aditi Pramod Kumari, Amit Kumar
{"title":"Insights into X-linked Dystonia-Parkinsonism and Spinocerebellar Ataxia type 36 Through the Lens of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/Frontotemporal Dementia.","authors":"Mansee Patel, Soumalya Das, Aditi Pramod Kumari, Amit Kumar","doi":"10.1007/s12035-026-06209-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The abnormal expansion of repetitive DNA sequences falls within the spectrum of neurological conditions driven by dual pathogenic pathways of RNA toxicity and protein toxicity. Within this spectrum, hexanucleotide repeat disorders (HRDs) represent a rare but important subgroup: C9orf72-amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/frontotemporal dementia (C9orf72-ALS/FTD), X-linked dystonia-parkinsonism (XDP) and spinocerebellar ataxia type 36 (SCA36), unified by the presence of expanded intronic repeats capable of forming non-canonical nucleic acid structures. Despite this shared repeat architecture, they differ in critical molecular and genetic respects: C9orf72-ALS/FTD is hallmarked by TDP-43 aggregation and prominent proteinopathy; SCA36 lacks TDP-43 pathology entirely; and XDP uniquely harbors a SINE-VNTR-Alu (SVA) retrotransposon insertion within the expanded locus and follows an X-linked recessive inheritance pattern. Among these, C9orf72-ALS/FTD is relatively well characterized, with established pathogenic mechanisms including G-quadruplex (G4) formation, dipeptide repeat (DPR) protein toxicity, RNA foci formation, and downstream cellular disruptions. The molecular mechanism underlying SCA36 and XDP remains comparatively less characterized. Given the mechanistic overlap with ALS/FTD, downstream disruptions such as RNA toxicity, mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired DNA repair and proteasomal dysfunction could similarly result from these core molecular processes. However, direct experimental evidence supporting these mechanisms in SCA36 and XDP remains limited. This review compares established, emerging and hypothetical mechanisms across HRDs to distinguish shared pathogenic pathways from disease-specific molecular features. Through horizontal comparison, this review identifies opportunities and limitations for translating ALS/FTD therapeutics to XDP and SCA36, establishing a unified analytical framework for mechanistic research and clinical intervention in rare repeat expansion disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":18762,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Neurobiology","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-026-06209-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The abnormal expansion of repetitive DNA sequences falls within the spectrum of neurological conditions driven by dual pathogenic pathways of RNA toxicity and protein toxicity. Within this spectrum, hexanucleotide repeat disorders (HRDs) represent a rare but important subgroup: C9orf72-amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/frontotemporal dementia (C9orf72-ALS/FTD), X-linked dystonia-parkinsonism (XDP) and spinocerebellar ataxia type 36 (SCA36), unified by the presence of expanded intronic repeats capable of forming non-canonical nucleic acid structures. Despite this shared repeat architecture, they differ in critical molecular and genetic respects: C9orf72-ALS/FTD is hallmarked by TDP-43 aggregation and prominent proteinopathy; SCA36 lacks TDP-43 pathology entirely; and XDP uniquely harbors a SINE-VNTR-Alu (SVA) retrotransposon insertion within the expanded locus and follows an X-linked recessive inheritance pattern. Among these, C9orf72-ALS/FTD is relatively well characterized, with established pathogenic mechanisms including G-quadruplex (G4) formation, dipeptide repeat (DPR) protein toxicity, RNA foci formation, and downstream cellular disruptions. The molecular mechanism underlying SCA36 and XDP remains comparatively less characterized. Given the mechanistic overlap with ALS/FTD, downstream disruptions such as RNA toxicity, mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired DNA repair and proteasomal dysfunction could similarly result from these core molecular processes. However, direct experimental evidence supporting these mechanisms in SCA36 and XDP remains limited. This review compares established, emerging and hypothetical mechanisms across HRDs to distinguish shared pathogenic pathways from disease-specific molecular features. Through horizontal comparison, this review identifies opportunities and limitations for translating ALS/FTD therapeutics to XDP and SCA36, establishing a unified analytical framework for mechanistic research and clinical intervention in rare repeat expansion disorders.

从肌萎缩侧索硬化/额颞叶痴呆的角度观察x连锁性肌张力障碍-帕金森病和脊髓小脑性共济失调36型
重复DNA序列的异常扩增属于由RNA毒性和蛋白质毒性双重致病途径驱动的神经系统疾病。在这个谱系中,六核苷酸重复紊乱(HRDs)代表了一个罕见但重要的亚群:c9orf72 -肌萎缩性侧索硬化症/额颞叶痴呆(C9orf72-ALS/FTD), x -连锁肌紧张性帕金森病(XDP)和脊髓小脑性共济失调36型(SCA36),由能够形成非典型核酸结构的扩展内含子重复序列的存在统一。尽管具有相同的重复结构,但它们在关键的分子和遗传方面存在差异:C9orf72-ALS/FTD以TDP-43聚集和突出的蛋白质病变为特征;SCA36完全缺乏TDP-43病理;XDP在扩展位点内独特地携带一个sin - vntr - alu (SVA)反转录转座子插入,并遵循x连锁隐性遗传模式。其中,C9orf72-ALS/FTD的特征相对较好,已确定的致病机制包括g -四重体(G4)形成、二肽重复(DPR)蛋白毒性、RNA病灶形成和下游细胞破坏。相对而言,SCA36和XDP的分子机制还不太清楚。考虑到与ALS/FTD的机制重叠,下游的破坏,如RNA毒性、线粒体功能障碍、DNA修复受损和蛋白酶体功能障碍,也可能由这些核心分子过程引起。然而,在SCA36和XDP中支持这些机制的直接实验证据仍然有限。这篇综述比较了HRDs中已建立的、新出现的和假设的机制,以区分共同的致病途径和疾病特异性分子特征。通过横向比较,本综述确定了将ALS/FTD治疗方法转化为XDP和SCA36的机会和局限性,为罕见重复扩张性疾病的机制研究和临床干预建立了统一的分析框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Neurobiology
Molecular Neurobiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
480
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Neurobiology is an exciting journal for neuroscientists needing to stay in close touch with progress at the forefront of molecular brain research today. It is an especially important periodical for graduate students and "postdocs," specifically designed to synthesize and critically assess research trends for all neuroscientists hoping to stay active at the cutting edge of this dramatically developing area. This journal has proven to be crucial in departmental libraries, serving as essential reading for every committed neuroscientist who is striving to keep abreast of all rapid developments in a forefront field. Most recent significant advances in experimental and clinical neuroscience have been occurring at the molecular level. Until now, there has been no journal devoted to looking closely at this fragmented literature in a critical, coherent fashion. Each submission is thoroughly analyzed by scientists and clinicians internationally renowned for their special competence in the areas treated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书