Early Economic Model of Extracorporeal Photopheresis and Other Treatments of Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation.

IF 2.5 Q2 ECONOMICS
Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2026-09-22 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.36469/001c.163450
Stephen Rice, Diarmuid Coughlan, Luke Vale, Carole Cohen, Christian Benden, David Bennett, Mark Greer, Jasvir Parmar, Adrien Tissot, Robin Vos, Myriam A Perez, Martin Carby, Richard Thompson, Karthik Santhanakrishnan, Andrew J Fisher
{"title":"Early Economic Model of Extracorporeal Photopheresis and Other Treatments of Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation.","authors":"Stephen Rice, Diarmuid Coughlan, Luke Vale, Carole Cohen, Christian Benden, David Bennett, Mark Greer, Jasvir Parmar, Adrien Tissot, Robin Vos, Myriam A Perez, Martin Carby, Richard Thompson, Karthik Santhanakrishnan, Andrew J Fisher","doi":"10.36469/001c.163450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a technology to treat chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) following lung transplantation. CLAD leads to significantly higher mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to develop an early economic model that can evaluate the potential cost-effectiveness of treatments for patients with a confirmed diagnosis of CLAD and to evaluate a plausible cost-effectiveness range for ECP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The literature was reviewed and clinical experts were consulted to develop a Markov model with change in percent forced expiratory volume in 1 second (%FEV1) states, defining rates of lung function decline. The literature and clinical experts were also consulted to determine plausible transition probabilities between %FEV1 states and resource use. Probabilities of dying were estimated by calibrating the model to published survival curves. Treatment response was obtained from cohort studies. EQ-5D values and unit costs were obtained from published sources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the base case analysis, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) estimates for ECP ranged from £33 343/QALY to £88 278/QALY. This does not account for risk of bias in the implicit relative risk estimate in the model or for scenario combinations. The ICER was lower in the bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome population than in the restrictive allograft syndrome population and in earlier CLAD stages. The ICER was lower if ECP was provided for a course of treatment and there was a persistent protective effect from lung function decline after cessation of treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was very little quality evidence to inform the decision model. The results included a wide range of ICERs. Key determinants include the therapeutic benefit of ECP after treatment cessation, response rates with standard care, and CLAD stage mortality rates.The economic model can be updated as new evidence emerges from ongoing clinical trials. For the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence in England, ECP may qualify as a highly specialized technology, for which the cost-effectiveness threshold may be £100 000/QALY or higher.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"13 2","pages":"104-111"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13613274/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.163450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a technology to treat chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) following lung transplantation. CLAD leads to significantly higher mortality rates.

Objective: The objective of this study was to develop an early economic model that can evaluate the potential cost-effectiveness of treatments for patients with a confirmed diagnosis of CLAD and to evaluate a plausible cost-effectiveness range for ECP.

Methods: The literature was reviewed and clinical experts were consulted to develop a Markov model with change in percent forced expiratory volume in 1 second (%FEV1) states, defining rates of lung function decline. The literature and clinical experts were also consulted to determine plausible transition probabilities between %FEV1 states and resource use. Probabilities of dying were estimated by calibrating the model to published survival curves. Treatment response was obtained from cohort studies. EQ-5D values and unit costs were obtained from published sources.

Results: In the base case analysis, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) estimates for ECP ranged from £33 343/QALY to £88 278/QALY. This does not account for risk of bias in the implicit relative risk estimate in the model or for scenario combinations. The ICER was lower in the bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome population than in the restrictive allograft syndrome population and in earlier CLAD stages. The ICER was lower if ECP was provided for a course of treatment and there was a persistent protective effect from lung function decline after cessation of treatment.

Conclusion: There was very little quality evidence to inform the decision model. The results included a wide range of ICERs. Key determinants include the therapeutic benefit of ECP after treatment cessation, response rates with standard care, and CLAD stage mortality rates.The economic model can be updated as new evidence emerges from ongoing clinical trials. For the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence in England, ECP may qualify as a highly specialized technology, for which the cost-effectiveness threshold may be £100 000/QALY or higher.

肺移植后慢性同种异体肺移植功能障碍的早期经济模型及其他治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书