Leonardo Pasquetti, Petar Zlatanovic, Edoardo Pasqui, Ognjen Kostic, Giuseppe Galzerano, Igor Koncar, Marko Dragas, Gianmarco de Donato
{"title":"The Role of Carotid Graft Interposition During Elective and Emergent Interventions: Protocol for a Scoping Review.","authors":"Leonardo Pasquetti, Petar Zlatanovic, Edoardo Pasqui, Ognjen Kostic, Giuseppe Galzerano, Igor Koncar, Marko Dragas, Gianmarco de Donato","doi":"10.2196/91594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In a significant proportion of carotid interventions, carotid graft replacement is required to achieve a successful outcome either as a primary method or as a bailout solution. Whether carotid grafting should be performed, the indications for its use, and other technical aspects remain insufficiently addressed in the literature. An exhaustive mapping of the sparse and heterogeneous evidence available in the literature may provide a more comprehensive understanding of this topic.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aims to examine and summarize the scientific evidence on the indications, graft types, and outcomes of graft interposition during elective and emergency carotid interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines for reporting. Peer-reviewed papers written in English will be identified through searches of the following databases: PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. The web-based systematic review platform Rayyan will be used for deduplication and study screening. The review will encompass the following clinical scenarios: elective carotid endarterectomy, emergent carotid endarterectomy, carotid artery restenosis, carotid artery trauma, carotid artery aneurysm, carotid artery dissection, carotid patch infection, radiation-induced carotid fibrosis, and carotid body tumors. All study designs (randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and case series) will be considered. Non-English studies, animal studies, cadaveric or anatomical-only reports, and purely technical notes without clinical data will be excluded. Data regarding extracranial-to-intracranial bypass will be excluded. Study selection based on title and abstract screening (first stage), full-text review (second stage), and data extraction (third stage) will be performed by a group of researchers, whereby each paper will be reviewed by at least 2 researchers. Any conflict regarding the inclusion or exclusion of a study and the data extraction will be resolved by discussion between the researchers who evaluated the papers; a third researcher will be involved if consensus is not reached. Data synthesis will be performed with the aim of clearly presenting the indications, graft types, and outcomes of graft interposition during carotid interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search strategy was finalized in July 2026. Preliminary searches of PubMed (MEDLINE), PROSPERO, and JBI Evidence Synthesis databases identified no published or registered systematic or scoping reviews specifically addressing carotid interposition grafting across elective and emergent carotid interventions. As of September 2026, formal database searches and study selection had not yet begun and were scheduled to start in October 2026. Data extraction and evidence synthesis are expected to be completed by spring 2027, and submission of the final scoping review is planned for summer 2027.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our scoping review will seek to provide an overview of the available evidence and identify research gaps regarding the role of graft interposition during elective and emergent carotid interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14755,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Research Protocols","volume":"15 ","pages":"e91594"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13614217/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Research Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/91594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: In a significant proportion of carotid interventions, carotid graft replacement is required to achieve a successful outcome either as a primary method or as a bailout solution. Whether carotid grafting should be performed, the indications for its use, and other technical aspects remain insufficiently addressed in the literature. An exhaustive mapping of the sparse and heterogeneous evidence available in the literature may provide a more comprehensive understanding of this topic.
Objective: This scoping review aims to examine and summarize the scientific evidence on the indications, graft types, and outcomes of graft interposition during elective and emergency carotid interventions.
Methods: This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines for reporting. Peer-reviewed papers written in English will be identified through searches of the following databases: PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. The web-based systematic review platform Rayyan will be used for deduplication and study screening. The review will encompass the following clinical scenarios: elective carotid endarterectomy, emergent carotid endarterectomy, carotid artery restenosis, carotid artery trauma, carotid artery aneurysm, carotid artery dissection, carotid patch infection, radiation-induced carotid fibrosis, and carotid body tumors. All study designs (randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and case series) will be considered. Non-English studies, animal studies, cadaveric or anatomical-only reports, and purely technical notes without clinical data will be excluded. Data regarding extracranial-to-intracranial bypass will be excluded. Study selection based on title and abstract screening (first stage), full-text review (second stage), and data extraction (third stage) will be performed by a group of researchers, whereby each paper will be reviewed by at least 2 researchers. Any conflict regarding the inclusion or exclusion of a study and the data extraction will be resolved by discussion between the researchers who evaluated the papers; a third researcher will be involved if consensus is not reached. Data synthesis will be performed with the aim of clearly presenting the indications, graft types, and outcomes of graft interposition during carotid interventions.
Results: The search strategy was finalized in July 2026. Preliminary searches of PubMed (MEDLINE), PROSPERO, and JBI Evidence Synthesis databases identified no published or registered systematic or scoping reviews specifically addressing carotid interposition grafting across elective and emergent carotid interventions. As of September 2026, formal database searches and study selection had not yet begun and were scheduled to start in October 2026. Data extraction and evidence synthesis are expected to be completed by spring 2027, and submission of the final scoping review is planned for summer 2027.
Conclusions: Our scoping review will seek to provide an overview of the available evidence and identify research gaps regarding the role of graft interposition during elective and emergent carotid interventions.
背景:在相当大比例的颈动脉干预中,颈动脉移植物置换术作为主要方法或紧急解决方案都需要获得成功的结果。是否应该进行颈动脉移植,其使用适应症和其他技术方面在文献中仍然没有得到充分的解决。对文献中可用的稀疏和异构证据进行详尽的映射可以提供对该主题的更全面的理解。目的:本综述旨在检查和总结有关择期和急诊颈动脉介入手术的适应症、移植物类型和移植物介入治疗结果的科学证据。方法:本范围评价将按照PRISMA-ScR(范围评价的系统评价和元分析扩展首选报告项目)指南进行报告。同行评议的英文论文将通过以下数据库进行检索:PubMed (MEDLINE)、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science。基于网络的系统评价平台Rayyan将用于重复数据删除和研究筛选。本综述将包括以下临床情况:选择性颈动脉内膜切除术、紧急颈动脉内膜切除术、颈动脉再狭窄、颈动脉外伤、颈动脉动脉瘤、颈动脉夹层、颈动脉贴片感染、辐射诱导的颈动脉纤维化和颈动脉体肿瘤。所有的研究设计(随机对照试验、观察性研究和病例系列)都将被考虑。非英语研究,动物研究,仅尸体或解剖报告,以及没有临床数据的纯技术笔记将被排除在外。关于颅外-颅内旁路的数据将被排除在外。研究选择基于标题和摘要筛选(第一阶段),全文审查(第二阶段)和数据提取(第三阶段)将由一组研究人员进行,其中每篇论文将由至少2名研究人员进行审查。关于纳入或排除研究和数据提取的任何冲突将通过评估论文的研究人员之间的讨论来解决;如果不能达成一致意见,将会有第三位研究者参与。数据综合的目的是清晰地呈现颈动脉介入手术中的适应症、移植物类型和移植物介入的结果。结果:搜索策略于2026年7月确定。对PubMed (MEDLINE)、PROSPERO和JBI证据合成数据库的初步检索发现,没有发表或注册的系统性或范围评价专门针对选择性和紧急颈动脉介入的颈动脉介入移植。截至2026年9月,正式的数据库搜索和研究选择尚未开始,计划于2026年10月开始。数据提取和证据综合预计将于2027年春季完成,最终范围审查计划于2027年夏季提交。结论:我们的范围审查将寻求提供现有证据的概述,并确定在选择性和紧急颈动脉介入手术中移植物介入作用的研究空白。