Genomic Reanalysis of Neurodevelopmental Disorders With and Without Epilepsy: Diagnostic Yield and Mechanisms of Newly Established Diagnoses.

IF 3.1 3区 生物学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Genes Pub Date : 2026-09-07 DOI:10.3390/genes17091078
Da Hye Yoon, Chang Ahn Seol, Jung Woo Rhim, Ji Yoon Han
{"title":"Genomic Reanalysis of Neurodevelopmental Disorders With and Without Epilepsy: Diagnostic Yield and Mechanisms of Newly Established Diagnoses.","authors":"Da Hye Yoon, Chang Ahn Seol, Jung Woo Rhim, Ji Yoon Han","doi":"10.3390/genes17091078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Genomic reanalysis may provide additional molecular diagnoses in patients with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) whose initial genetic testing was nondiagnostic. We evaluated the diagnostic yield and mechanisms of newly established diagnoses in NDDs with and without epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 175 patients with previously unresolved NDDs who underwent whole-exome sequencing between 2015 and 2024. Archived WES variant call format (VCF) files were reannotated using updated databases and variant prioritization criteria, followed by phenotype- and inheritance-informed clinical interpretation. Patients were classified as NDD without epilepsy (<i>n</i> = 133) or NDD with epilepsy (NDD+E; <i>n</i> = 42).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five new molecular diagnoses were established, yielding an incremental diagnostic yield of 3% (5/175). The yield was numerically higher in the NDD+E group than in the NDD group (7% [3/42] vs. 2% [2/133]), although the difference was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.090). Newly established diagnoses involved <i>NPRL3</i>, <i>RYR1</i>, <i>SYNGAP1</i>, <i>CSNK2B</i>, and <i>SETD5</i> and arose through distinct mechanisms, including complementary CNV testing with retrospective sequencing review, phenotype- and inheritance-informed reinterpretation, recognition of insufficient initial sequencing coverage, and updated variant interpretation incorporating new evidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Genomic re-evaluation provided additional diagnoses in a modest but clinically relevant proportion of previously unresolved pediatric NDD cases. Periodic, phenotype-informed reassessment of existing genomic data, together with complementary testing when indicated, may resolve diagnoses missed or uninterpretable at the initial evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12688,"journal":{"name":"Genes","volume":"17 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13606157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genes","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17091078","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Genomic reanalysis may provide additional molecular diagnoses in patients with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) whose initial genetic testing was nondiagnostic. We evaluated the diagnostic yield and mechanisms of newly established diagnoses in NDDs with and without epilepsy.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 175 patients with previously unresolved NDDs who underwent whole-exome sequencing between 2015 and 2024. Archived WES variant call format (VCF) files were reannotated using updated databases and variant prioritization criteria, followed by phenotype- and inheritance-informed clinical interpretation. Patients were classified as NDD without epilepsy (n = 133) or NDD with epilepsy (NDD+E; n = 42).

Results: Five new molecular diagnoses were established, yielding an incremental diagnostic yield of 3% (5/175). The yield was numerically higher in the NDD+E group than in the NDD group (7% [3/42] vs. 2% [2/133]), although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.090). Newly established diagnoses involved NPRL3, RYR1, SYNGAP1, CSNK2B, and SETD5 and arose through distinct mechanisms, including complementary CNV testing with retrospective sequencing review, phenotype- and inheritance-informed reinterpretation, recognition of insufficient initial sequencing coverage, and updated variant interpretation incorporating new evidence.

Conclusions: Genomic re-evaluation provided additional diagnoses in a modest but clinically relevant proportion of previously unresolved pediatric NDD cases. Periodic, phenotype-informed reassessment of existing genomic data, together with complementary testing when indicated, may resolve diagnoses missed or uninterpretable at the initial evaluation.

伴和不伴癫痫的神经发育障碍的基因组再分析:新建立诊断的诊断率和机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genes
Genes GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1975
审稿时长
22.94 days
期刊介绍: Genes (ISSN 2073-4425) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to genes, genetics and genomics. It publishes reviews, research articles, communications and technical notes. There is no restriction on the length of the papers and we encourage scientists to publish their results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书