Association of Cardiac Conduction System Radiation Doses with Incident Atrial Fibrillation in Lung Cancer.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Hakan Yalman, Ilayda Yalman, Mehmet Semih Belpinar, Murat Cimci, Halil Cumhur Yildirim, Fazilet Oner Dincbas, Kivanc Yalin
{"title":"Association of Cardiac Conduction System Radiation Doses with Incident Atrial Fibrillation in Lung Cancer.","authors":"Hakan Yalman, Ilayda Yalman, Mehmet Semih Belpinar, Murat Cimci, Halil Cumhur Yildirim, Fazilet Oner Dincbas, Kivanc Yalin","doi":"10.1007/s12012-026-10198-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thoracic radiotherapy (RT) is linked to cardiovascular toxicity, but its impact on the cardiac conduction system, particularly the sinoatrial (SA) node, is poorly defined. We examined whether SA node radiation dose is associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF), accounting for the competing risk of death. We retrospectively studied 84 lung cancer patients undergoing thoracic RT, stratified by maximum SA node dose (D<sub>max</sub>) using an exploratory, data-derived threshold of 17.23 Gy. Cumulative incidence functions and Fine-Gray regression, treating death as a competing event, assessed AF risk. Median age was 68.5 years; median follow-up was 12.0 months. AF occurred in 9 patients (10.7%). The high-dose SA node group (>17.23 Gy) was significantly younger (65.5 vs. 70.0 years; P=0.010) with similar Mayo AF Risk Scores (P=0.821), yet had a higher 24-month cumulative incidence of AF (18.8% vs. 4.1%; Gray's test P=0.038). AV node D<sub>max</sub> was not associated with AF but correlated with post-radiotherapy PR-interval prolongation (+14.1 ms; Spearman ρ=0.47, P=0.006). In an exploratory multivariable model adjusting for age, SA node D<sub>max</sub> remained associated with AF (adjusted sHR 1.04 per 1-Gy; 95% CI 1.01-1.06; P=0.008), warranting cautious interpretation given the limited event number. In this hypothesis-generating, single-center cohort, higher SA node dose was associated with increased AF incidence independent of age, while AV node dose was linked to PR prolongation rather than AF. These preliminary findings require validation in larger, prospective, multicenter cohorts before the SA node can be considered a formal organ at risk in RT planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":9570,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Toxicology","volume":"26 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12012-026-10198-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thoracic radiotherapy (RT) is linked to cardiovascular toxicity, but its impact on the cardiac conduction system, particularly the sinoatrial (SA) node, is poorly defined. We examined whether SA node radiation dose is associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF), accounting for the competing risk of death. We retrospectively studied 84 lung cancer patients undergoing thoracic RT, stratified by maximum SA node dose (Dmax) using an exploratory, data-derived threshold of 17.23 Gy. Cumulative incidence functions and Fine-Gray regression, treating death as a competing event, assessed AF risk. Median age was 68.5 years; median follow-up was 12.0 months. AF occurred in 9 patients (10.7%). The high-dose SA node group (>17.23 Gy) was significantly younger (65.5 vs. 70.0 years; P=0.010) with similar Mayo AF Risk Scores (P=0.821), yet had a higher 24-month cumulative incidence of AF (18.8% vs. 4.1%; Gray's test P=0.038). AV node Dmax was not associated with AF but correlated with post-radiotherapy PR-interval prolongation (+14.1 ms; Spearman ρ=0.47, P=0.006). In an exploratory multivariable model adjusting for age, SA node Dmax remained associated with AF (adjusted sHR 1.04 per 1-Gy; 95% CI 1.01-1.06; P=0.008), warranting cautious interpretation given the limited event number. In this hypothesis-generating, single-center cohort, higher SA node dose was associated with increased AF incidence independent of age, while AV node dose was linked to PR prolongation rather than AF. These preliminary findings require validation in larger, prospective, multicenter cohorts before the SA node can be considered a formal organ at risk in RT planning.

心脏传导系统辐射剂量与肺癌患者心房颤动的关系。
胸部放射治疗(RT)与心血管毒性有关,但其对心脏传导系统,特别是窦房结(SA)的影响尚未明确。我们研究了窦房结辐射剂量是否与新发心房颤动(AF)相关,并考虑了死亡的竞争风险。我们回顾性研究了84例接受胸部放射治疗的肺癌患者,采用探索性的、数据衍生的阈值17.23 Gy,按最大SA结剂量(Dmax)分层。累积发生率函数和Fine-Gray回归,将死亡视为竞争事件,评估房颤风险。中位年龄68.5岁;中位随访时间为12.0个月。9例(10.7%)发生房颤。高剂量SA结组(>17.23 Gy)明显更年轻(65.5 vs. 70.0岁,P=0.010), Mayo房颤风险评分相似(P=0.821),但24个月累积房颤发病率更高(18.8% vs. 4.1%, Gray检验P=0.038)。房室结Dmax与房颤无关,但与放疗后pr间期延长相关(+14.1 ms; Spearman ρ=0.47, P=0.006)。在调整年龄的探索性多变量模型中,SA结Dmax仍与AF相关(调整后sHR为1.04 / 1-Gy; 95% CI为1.01-1.06;P=0.008),鉴于事件数量有限,需要谨慎解释。在这一假设产生的单中心队列中,较高的房室结剂量与房颤发病率增加相关,与年龄无关,而房室结剂量与PR延长有关,而与房颤无关。这些初步发现需要在更大、前瞻性、多中心队列中进行验证,才能在RT计划中将房室结视为正式的危险器官。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Toxicology
Cardiovascular Toxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
61
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Toxicology is the only journal dedicated to publishing contemporary issues, timely reviews, and experimental and clinical data on toxicological aspects of cardiovascular disease. CT publishes papers that will elucidate the effects, molecular mechanisms, and signaling pathways of environmental toxicants on the cardiovascular system. Also covered are the detrimental effects of new cardiovascular drugs, and cardiovascular effects of non-cardiovascular drugs, anti-cancer chemotherapy, and gene therapy. In addition, Cardiovascular Toxicology reports safety and toxicological data on new cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular drugs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书