Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs), coercion, and mental health outcomes in psychiatric inpatient care: a national mixed-methods study comparing immigrant and majority populations.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Lina Harvold Ellingsen-Dalskau, Øyvind Bjertnæs, Marte Karoline Råberg Kjøllesdal, Hilde Hestad Iversen
{"title":"Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs), coercion, and mental health outcomes in psychiatric inpatient care: a national mixed-methods study comparing immigrant and majority populations.","authors":"Lina Harvold Ellingsen-Dalskau, Øyvind Bjertnæs, Marte Karoline Råberg Kjøllesdal, Hilde Hestad Iversen","doi":"10.1186/s12913-026-15511-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immigrants are at increased risk of mental health problems but underutilize specialist services and may face barriers to high-quality care. Evidence regarding their experiences in psychiatric inpatient settings remains limited. This study examined differences in patient experiences, coercion, and change in mental health between immigrant groups and the majority population and considered challenges in measuring and comparing patient-reported experiences across groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A national survey was conducted across Norwegian psychiatric inpatient institutions from January 2020 to June 2022. The Psychiatric Inpatient Patient Experience Questionnaire - Continuous Electronic Measurement (PIPEQ-CEM) was used with demographic, coercion, and mental health indicators. Linear regression examined associations between region-of-birth and key outcomes. Additionally, 390 comments from immigrant patients and 125 from Norwegian-born patients were thematically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 8,184 patients (89.5% Norwegian-born) revealed few group differences in overall patient experience scores. However, some immigrant groups rated aspects-including initial welcome, privacy, and treatment benefit-lower than the majority population, in addition to higher levels of coercion and less improvement in mental health. Thematic analysis revealed immigrant-specific experiences related to expectations and prior knowledge of psychiatric care, belonging and trust, communication, and access to information.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While overall patient experience scores were largely similar, some immigrant groups reported higher coercion and less favorable mental health trajectories. Qualitative findings highlighted contextual factors that may shape how patients experience and report care. These results underline the importance of culturally sensitive psychiatric care delivery and culturally appropriate measurement of patient experiences across diverse populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13615574/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-15511-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Immigrants are at increased risk of mental health problems but underutilize specialist services and may face barriers to high-quality care. Evidence regarding their experiences in psychiatric inpatient settings remains limited. This study examined differences in patient experiences, coercion, and change in mental health between immigrant groups and the majority population and considered challenges in measuring and comparing patient-reported experiences across groups.

Methods: A national survey was conducted across Norwegian psychiatric inpatient institutions from January 2020 to June 2022. The Psychiatric Inpatient Patient Experience Questionnaire - Continuous Electronic Measurement (PIPEQ-CEM) was used with demographic, coercion, and mental health indicators. Linear regression examined associations between region-of-birth and key outcomes. Additionally, 390 comments from immigrant patients and 125 from Norwegian-born patients were thematically analyzed.

Results: Data from 8,184 patients (89.5% Norwegian-born) revealed few group differences in overall patient experience scores. However, some immigrant groups rated aspects-including initial welcome, privacy, and treatment benefit-lower than the majority population, in addition to higher levels of coercion and less improvement in mental health. Thematic analysis revealed immigrant-specific experiences related to expectations and prior knowledge of psychiatric care, belonging and trust, communication, and access to information.

Conclusions: While overall patient experience scores were largely similar, some immigrant groups reported higher coercion and less favorable mental health trajectories. Qualitative findings highlighted contextual factors that may shape how patients experience and report care. These results underline the importance of culturally sensitive psychiatric care delivery and culturally appropriate measurement of patient experiences across diverse populations.

患者报告经验措施(PREMs)、胁迫和精神科住院患者的心理健康结果:一项比较移民和多数人口的国家混合方法研究。
背景:移民患精神健康问题的风险增加,但专科服务利用不足,在获得高质量护理方面可能面临障碍。关于他们在精神病住院环境中的经历的证据仍然有限。本研究考察了移民群体和大多数人群在患者经历、胁迫和心理健康变化方面的差异,并考虑了在测量和比较不同群体患者报告的经历方面的挑战。方法:从2020年1月到2022年6月,在挪威精神病住院机构进行了一项全国性调查。精神科住院病人体验问卷-连续电子测量(PIPEQ-CEM)与人口学、强迫和心理健康指标一起使用。线性回归检验了出生地区与关键结果之间的关系。此外,对来自移民患者的390条评论和来自挪威出生患者的125条评论进行了主题分析。结果:来自8184名患者(89.5%挪威出生)的数据显示,总体患者体验评分几乎没有组间差异。然而,一些移民群体的评价——包括最初的欢迎、隐私和治疗福利——低于大多数人,此外还有更高程度的胁迫和更少的心理健康改善。专题分析揭示了移民对精神科护理的期望和先验知识、归属感和信任、沟通和信息获取的具体经历。结论:虽然总体患者体验得分大体相似,但一些移民群体报告了更高的胁迫和更不利的心理健康轨迹。定性研究结果强调了可能影响患者如何体验和报告护理的环境因素。这些结果强调了文化上敏感的精神病学护理交付和文化上适当的不同人群患者体验测量的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书