CDELDA: A Content-Based Dual-Encoder for Cold-Start lncRNA-Disease Association Prediction.

IF 4.5 3区 工程技术 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Sanguk Kim, Taehyeon Yun, Jihwan Ha
{"title":"CDELDA: A Content-Based Dual-Encoder for Cold-Start lncRNA-Disease Association Prediction.","authors":"Sanguk Kim, Taehyeon Yun, Jihwan Ha","doi":"10.3390/biomedicines14092121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> An important challenge in long non-coding RNA (lncRNA)-disease association prediction is prioritizing candidates when neither target node has association records in the training data, even though content features are available. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a content-based model for this both-cold setting. <b>Methods:</b> We developed CDELDA, a dual-encoder model combining lncRNA sequence, structure, and expression features with disease text, semantic similarity, and ontology-structure features. CDELDA was compared with five baseline methods on a normalized benchmark comprising 1662 lncRNAs, 220 diseases, and 9920 positive associations. Evaluation covered warm, lncRNA-cold, disease-cold, and both-cold settings, with association-derived inputs constructed from training labels. Disease-macro area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was the main comparison metric, complemented by average precision and top-ranked retrieval metrics. Feature ablation, disease-feature perturbation, sensitivity analyses, and literature-based case studies further characterized model performance. <b>Results:</b> Under both-cold evaluation, CDELDA achieved a mean disease-macro AUROC of 0.6617, compared with 0.6123 for SIMCLDA, the highest-scoring literature baseline on this metric. Relative performance varied across evaluation settings and metrics. Removing expression features produced the largest decrease in disease-macro AUROC among individual lncRNA feature removals. Reassigning disease features reduced performance, although ranking performance was partly retained. Literature review identified functional or observational support for 14 of 20 reviewed candidate pairs. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings suggest that CDELDA can support content-based candidate prioritization under both-cold evaluation. The predictions provide candidates for biological follow-up, with disease-specific relevance requiring independent validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8937,"journal":{"name":"Biomedicines","volume":"14 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13604804/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedicines","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14092121","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: An important challenge in long non-coding RNA (lncRNA)-disease association prediction is prioritizing candidates when neither target node has association records in the training data, even though content features are available. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a content-based model for this both-cold setting. Methods: We developed CDELDA, a dual-encoder model combining lncRNA sequence, structure, and expression features with disease text, semantic similarity, and ontology-structure features. CDELDA was compared with five baseline methods on a normalized benchmark comprising 1662 lncRNAs, 220 diseases, and 9920 positive associations. Evaluation covered warm, lncRNA-cold, disease-cold, and both-cold settings, with association-derived inputs constructed from training labels. Disease-macro area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was the main comparison metric, complemented by average precision and top-ranked retrieval metrics. Feature ablation, disease-feature perturbation, sensitivity analyses, and literature-based case studies further characterized model performance. Results: Under both-cold evaluation, CDELDA achieved a mean disease-macro AUROC of 0.6617, compared with 0.6123 for SIMCLDA, the highest-scoring literature baseline on this metric. Relative performance varied across evaluation settings and metrics. Removing expression features produced the largest decrease in disease-macro AUROC among individual lncRNA feature removals. Reassigning disease features reduced performance, although ranking performance was partly retained. Literature review identified functional or observational support for 14 of 20 reviewed candidate pairs. Conclusions: These findings suggest that CDELDA can support content-based candidate prioritization under both-cold evaluation. The predictions provide candidates for biological follow-up, with disease-specific relevance requiring independent validation.

CDELDA:用于冷启动lncrna -疾病关联预测的基于内容的双编码器。
背景/目的:长链非编码RNA (lncRNA)-疾病关联预测的一个重要挑战是,当训练数据中两个目标节点都没有关联记录时,即使内容特征可用,也要优先考虑候选节点。本研究旨在开发和评估一种基于内容的模型,用于这两种冷环境。方法:我们开发了CDELDA,这是一种将lncRNA序列、结构和表达特征与疾病文本、语义相似性和本体结构特征相结合的双编码器模型。CDELDA在包括1662种lncrna、220种疾病和9920种阳性关联的标准化基准上比较了五种基线方法。评估包括温暖、lncrna -冷、疾病-冷和两种冷设置,并使用由训练标签构建的关联衍生输入。受试者工作特征曲线下的疾病宏观面积(AUROC)是主要的比较指标,其次是平均精度和排名靠前的检索指标。特征消融、疾病特征扰动、敏感性分析和基于文献的案例研究进一步表征了模型的性能。结果:在双冷评价下,CDELDA的平均疾病宏观AUROC为0.6617,而SIMCLDA的平均疾病宏观AUROC为0.6123,SIMCLDA是该指标中得分最高的文献基线。相对性能因评估设置和度量而异。在单个lncRNA特征去除中,去除表达特征导致疾病宏观AUROC下降幅度最大。重新分配疾病特征降低了性能,尽管部分保留了排名性能。文献综述发现20对候选配对中有14对具有功能性或观察性支持。结论:这些发现表明CDELDA可以支持基于内容的候选优先级。这些预测为生物随访提供了候选者,疾病特异性相关性需要独立验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedicines
Biomedicines Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.50%
发文量
2823
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Biomedicines (ISSN 2227-9059; CODEN: BIOMID) is an international, scientific, open access journal on biomedicines published quarterly online by MDPI.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书