{"title":"Multimodal transformers predict cancer therapy response from tumor mechanics.","authors":"Styliana Georgiou, Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos, Chrysovalantis Voutouri","doi":"10.1016/j.array.2026.101168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Precise prediction of cancer therapy response remains challenging because conventional biomarkers capture molecular features but overlook the physical state of tumors. We developed a multimodal deep-learning framework integrating ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) images with quantitative stiffness measurements (elastic modulus, kPa) to predict treatment outcomes in preclinical murine tumors. Each image-stiffness pair is tokenized within a transformer that learns interactions between local elastographic texture and global rigidity. A lightweight convolutional encoder extracts image features, the modulus is embedded as a numeric token, and self-attention fuses both modalities for classification. Trained on 1578 baseline SWE images from five syngeneic tumor models, the model classified tumors as responders, stable, or non-responders. Across five random seeds, it achieved 92.4% ± 1.3% accuracy, macro-F1 0.92, and ROC-AUC 0.99 on a held-out test set, with well-calibrated probabilities. Matched-split ablations-image-only, stiffness-token-removed, stiffness-shuffled, late-fusion, and stiffness-only-showed that performance reflected genuine cross-modal learning rather than scalar stiffness alone; shuffling image-stiffness pairings significantly reduced accuracy (all corrected p < 0.01). Leave-one-tumor-model-out analysis demonstrated generalization to unseen tumor types, with 95.5% ± 1.5% accuracy (range 93.9-97.9%) across five held-out models. Lower baseline stiffness correlated with better response, supporting the hypothesis that mechanically normalized tumors respond more effectively. These preclinical proof-of-concept findings establish tumor mechanics as candidate predictive biomarkers and transformer-based multimodal learning as a scalable approach to biomechanically informed response prediction, while requiring validation in human cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":8417,"journal":{"name":"Array","volume":"31 ","pages":"None"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13614918/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Array","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.array.2026.101168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Precise prediction of cancer therapy response remains challenging because conventional biomarkers capture molecular features but overlook the physical state of tumors. We developed a multimodal deep-learning framework integrating ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) images with quantitative stiffness measurements (elastic modulus, kPa) to predict treatment outcomes in preclinical murine tumors. Each image-stiffness pair is tokenized within a transformer that learns interactions between local elastographic texture and global rigidity. A lightweight convolutional encoder extracts image features, the modulus is embedded as a numeric token, and self-attention fuses both modalities for classification. Trained on 1578 baseline SWE images from five syngeneic tumor models, the model classified tumors as responders, stable, or non-responders. Across five random seeds, it achieved 92.4% ± 1.3% accuracy, macro-F1 0.92, and ROC-AUC 0.99 on a held-out test set, with well-calibrated probabilities. Matched-split ablations-image-only, stiffness-token-removed, stiffness-shuffled, late-fusion, and stiffness-only-showed that performance reflected genuine cross-modal learning rather than scalar stiffness alone; shuffling image-stiffness pairings significantly reduced accuracy (all corrected p < 0.01). Leave-one-tumor-model-out analysis demonstrated generalization to unseen tumor types, with 95.5% ± 1.5% accuracy (range 93.9-97.9%) across five held-out models. Lower baseline stiffness correlated with better response, supporting the hypothesis that mechanically normalized tumors respond more effectively. These preclinical proof-of-concept findings establish tumor mechanics as candidate predictive biomarkers and transformer-based multimodal learning as a scalable approach to biomechanically informed response prediction, while requiring validation in human cohorts.