Dose accuracy evaluation of multi-leaf collimator modeling in single-isocenter multi-target stereotactic radiosurgery

IF 3.2 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Farnaz Rahim Li, Rex A. Cardan, Joel A. Pogue, Natalie N. Viscariello, Rodney J. Sullivan, John B. Fiveash, Carlos E. Cardenas, Richard A. Popple
{"title":"Dose accuracy evaluation of multi-leaf collimator modeling in single-isocenter multi-target stereotactic radiosurgery","authors":"Farnaz Rahim Li,&nbsp;Rex A. Cardan,&nbsp;Joel A. Pogue,&nbsp;Natalie N. Viscariello,&nbsp;Rodney J. Sullivan,&nbsp;John B. Fiveash,&nbsp;Carlos E. Cardenas,&nbsp;Richard A. Popple","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2026.101076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Accurate modeling of multi-leaf collimators is critical for dose calculation in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), where steep dose gradients and small target volumes amplify modeling uncertainties. This study compared enhanced leaf modeling and dosimetric leaf gap approaches using two clinically implemented dose calculation algorithms in single-isocenter SRS plans.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Sixty clinical volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) single-isocenter SRS plans (30 single-target, SIST; 30 multi-target, SIMT) were selected and measured with a two-dimensional diode array, normalized to a point measurement. Dose was calculated using both enhanced leaf model (ELM) and dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) models and the anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) and Acuros XB (AXB) algorithms across several spot-size configurations. Plan quality assurance was assessed using gamma analysis for several dose-distance criteria. Dose differences were further analyzed as functions of target size and distance from isocenter.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Under 2%/1 mm gamma criteria, AXB-DLG having spot size 0.5 × 0.5 mm<sup>2</sup> showed the highest median and mean gamma pass rate (fraction of points having gamma &gt;1), 98.7% and 97.4% respectively, while AXB-ELM having spot-size 0.5 × 0.7 mm<sup>2</sup> had the lowest, 98% and 96.3%, respectively. SIST and SIMT plans showed no clinically significant differences. AAA-ELM (spot size: 0 × 0 mm<sup>2</sup>) achieved the highest median and mean gamma values, while AXB-DLG remained robust across plan types. Dose calculations were accurate for both configurations, with minimal mean differences (0.0%, range − 2.7% to +1.8%) reported.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>DLG showed slightly better VMAT SRS agreement than ELM, but differences were clinically negligible. ELM's model-based MLC configuration removes user-specific DLG variability, potentially improving dose-calculation precision and consistency across institutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 101076"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631626001764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

Accurate modeling of multi-leaf collimators is critical for dose calculation in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), where steep dose gradients and small target volumes amplify modeling uncertainties. This study compared enhanced leaf modeling and dosimetric leaf gap approaches using two clinically implemented dose calculation algorithms in single-isocenter SRS plans.

Materials and methods

Sixty clinical volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) single-isocenter SRS plans (30 single-target, SIST; 30 multi-target, SIMT) were selected and measured with a two-dimensional diode array, normalized to a point measurement. Dose was calculated using both enhanced leaf model (ELM) and dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) models and the anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) and Acuros XB (AXB) algorithms across several spot-size configurations. Plan quality assurance was assessed using gamma analysis for several dose-distance criteria. Dose differences were further analyzed as functions of target size and distance from isocenter.

Results

Under 2%/1 mm gamma criteria, AXB-DLG having spot size 0.5 × 0.5 mm2 showed the highest median and mean gamma pass rate (fraction of points having gamma >1), 98.7% and 97.4% respectively, while AXB-ELM having spot-size 0.5 × 0.7 mm2 had the lowest, 98% and 96.3%, respectively. SIST and SIMT plans showed no clinically significant differences. AAA-ELM (spot size: 0 × 0 mm2) achieved the highest median and mean gamma values, while AXB-DLG remained robust across plan types. Dose calculations were accurate for both configurations, with minimal mean differences (0.0%, range − 2.7% to +1.8%) reported.

Conclusions

DLG showed slightly better VMAT SRS agreement than ELM, but differences were clinically negligible. ELM's model-based MLC configuration removes user-specific DLG variability, potentially improving dose-calculation precision and consistency across institutions.
多叶准直器模型在单等中心多靶点立体定向放射手术中的剂量精度评价
背景与目的多叶准直器的精确建模对于立体定向放射外科(SRS)的剂量计算至关重要,其中陡峭的剂量梯度和小靶体积放大了建模的不确定性。本研究比较了在单等中心SRS计划中使用两种临床实施的剂量计算算法的增强叶片建模和剂量学叶片间隙方法。材料和方法选择60个临床体积调制电弧治疗(VMAT)单等中心SRS计划(30个单靶点,SIST; 30个多靶点,SIMT),用二维二极管阵列进行测量,归一化为点测量。剂量计算采用增强叶模型(ELM)和剂量学叶间隙(DLG)模型以及各向异性分析算法(AAA)和acros XB (AXB)算法。使用伽马分析对若干剂量-距离标准评估计划质量保证。剂量差异进一步分析为靶大小和距等中心距离的函数。结果在2%/1 mm伽马标准下,斑点大小为0.5 × 0.5 mm2的AXB-DLG的中位通过率和平均通过率最高,分别为98.7%和97.4%,斑点大小为0.5 × 0.7 mm2的AXB-ELM的中位通过率和平均通过率最低,分别为98%和96.3%。SIST与SIMT方案无显著差异。AAA-ELM(斑点大小:0 × 0 mm2)获得了最高的中位数和平均伽马值,而AXB-DLG在计划类型中保持稳健。两种配置的剂量计算都是准确的,报告的平均差异最小(0.0%,范围为- 2.7%至+1.8%)。结论sdlg的VMAT SRS一致性略好于ELM,但临床差异可忽略不计。ELM基于模型的MLC配置消除了用户特定的DLG可变性,潜在地提高了剂量计算的精度和跨机构的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书