Long-Read sequencing in psychiatric omics: a systematic review of current evidence

IF 10.4 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Bruno Takao Real Karia,Vanessa Ota,Renato Polimanti,Marcos Leite Santoro,Sintia Belangero,Carolina Muniz Carvalho
{"title":"Long-Read sequencing in psychiatric omics: a systematic review of current evidence","authors":"Bruno Takao Real Karia,Vanessa Ota,Renato Polimanti,Marcos Leite Santoro,Sintia Belangero,Carolina Muniz Carvalho","doi":"10.1038/s41380-026-03909-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background The comprehensive elucidation of genomic relevance for mental disorder was, until recently, constrained by the limitations of microarrays or short-read sequencing (SRS). Long-read sequencing (LRS) provides access to complex classes of genetic variation and genomic architecture that are largely obscured in SRS approaches, making it a powerful tool for uncovering missing heritability and mechanistic insights in mental disorders. Objective We synthesize current evidence on the application of LRS technologies across genomic, transcriptomic, and methylomic studies of mental disorders. The systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Results and discussion The literature search yielded 2,166 articles, and 14 were included in the review after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. From a genomic perspective, LRS consistently outperformed SRS, increasing structural variant (SV) and de novo mutation (DNM) detection, particularly resolving medium-sized SVs and large inversions in repetitive regions. Transcriptomic studies established LRS as essential for achieving full-length transcript resolution, uncovering substantial novel isoform diversity and widespread alternative splicing events in the human neocortex. Crucially, LRS demonstrated that psychiatric risk is often conferred by dysregulated alternative splicing leading to isoform-specific imbalances, rather than altered total gene expression. At the epigenomic level, LRS enabled the haplotype-specific mapping of Allele-Specific Methylation within genome-wide significant loci, linking genetic risk to epigenetic dysregulation. Overall, LRS represents a significant technological advancement, providing the high-resolution molecular detail necessary to begin characterizing the complex relationships between genetic variation, splicing dynamics, and epigenetic modifications, thereby helping to contextualize psychiatric risk associations for future translational research.","PeriodicalId":19008,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Psychiatry","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-026-03909-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background The comprehensive elucidation of genomic relevance for mental disorder was, until recently, constrained by the limitations of microarrays or short-read sequencing (SRS). Long-read sequencing (LRS) provides access to complex classes of genetic variation and genomic architecture that are largely obscured in SRS approaches, making it a powerful tool for uncovering missing heritability and mechanistic insights in mental disorders. Objective We synthesize current evidence on the application of LRS technologies across genomic, transcriptomic, and methylomic studies of mental disorders. The systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Results and discussion The literature search yielded 2,166 articles, and 14 were included in the review after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. From a genomic perspective, LRS consistently outperformed SRS, increasing structural variant (SV) and de novo mutation (DNM) detection, particularly resolving medium-sized SVs and large inversions in repetitive regions. Transcriptomic studies established LRS as essential for achieving full-length transcript resolution, uncovering substantial novel isoform diversity and widespread alternative splicing events in the human neocortex. Crucially, LRS demonstrated that psychiatric risk is often conferred by dysregulated alternative splicing leading to isoform-specific imbalances, rather than altered total gene expression. At the epigenomic level, LRS enabled the haplotype-specific mapping of Allele-Specific Methylation within genome-wide significant loci, linking genetic risk to epigenetic dysregulation. Overall, LRS represents a significant technological advancement, providing the high-resolution molecular detail necessary to begin characterizing the complex relationships between genetic variation, splicing dynamics, and epigenetic modifications, thereby helping to contextualize psychiatric risk associations for future translational research.
精神病组学中的长读测序:对当前证据的系统回顾
直到最近,对精神障碍基因组相关性的全面阐明还受到微阵列或短读测序(SRS)的限制。长读测序(LRS)提供了在SRS方法中很大程度上模糊的遗传变异和基因组结构的复杂类别,使其成为揭示精神障碍中缺失的遗传性和机制见解的有力工具。目的:综合目前LRS技术在精神障碍基因组学、转录组学和甲基组学研究中的应用证据。系统评价是按照PRISMA指南进行的。结果与讨论文献检索共获得2166篇文献,应用纳入和排除标准纳入14篇文献。从基因组的角度来看,LRS一直优于SRS,增加了结构变异(SV)和新生突变(DNM)的检测,特别是解决了重复区域的中型变异和大型反转。转录组学研究表明,LRS对于实现全长转录物分辨率、揭示人类新皮层中大量新的异构体多样性和广泛的可选剪接事件至关重要。至关重要的是,LRS表明,精神病风险通常是由导致异构体特异性失衡的选择性剪接失调引起的,而不是总基因表达的改变。在表观基因组水平上,LRS实现了全基因组显著位点内等位基因特异性甲基化的单倍型特异性定位,将遗传风险与表观遗传失调联系起来。总的来说,LRS代表了一项重大的技术进步,提供了开始描述遗传变异、剪接动力学和表观遗传修饰之间复杂关系所需的高分辨率分子细节,从而有助于为未来的转化研究提供精神疾病风险关联的背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Psychiatry
Molecular Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
20.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
459
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Psychiatry focuses on publishing research that aims to uncover the biological mechanisms behind psychiatric disorders and their treatment. The journal emphasizes studies that bridge pre-clinical and clinical research, covering cellular, molecular, integrative, clinical, imaging, and psychopharmacology levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书