Speech Perception Profiles in Korean-Speaking Children With Speech Sound Disorders

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Hajeong Bang, Seunghee Ha
{"title":"Speech Perception Profiles in Korean-Speaking Children With Speech Sound Disorders","authors":"Hajeong Bang,&nbsp;Seunghee Ha","doi":"10.1111/1460-6984.70340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Children with speech sound disorders (SSD) constitute a heterogeneous population, with speech difficulties arising from different loci within the speech processing system. Speech perception has long been implicated in SSD; however, previous findings remain mixed, partly due to differences in task demands and limited consideration of SSD subtypes. In particular, few studies have systematically examined speech perception across multiple contrast types that are explicitly structured around common developmental error patterns and across clinically defined SSD subgroups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to: (a) compare speech perception performance between children with SSD and typically developing (TD) peers across different phonological contrast types, and (b) examine whether children with articulation disorder, phonological delay, and phonological disorder exhibit distinct perceptual profiles that reflect subtype-specific characteristics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Fifty-two Korean-speaking children aged 5–6 years participated (26 SSD; 26 TD). Speech perception was assessed using a minimal-pair identification task incorporating four substitution patterns frequently observed in Korean-speaking children: velar fronting, fricative stopping, affricate stopping, and affrication. Children with SSD were further classified into articulation disorder, phonological delay, and phonological disorder subgroups based on their surface error patterns. Group differences were analyzed in terms of overall accuracy and contrast-specific performance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Children with SSD performed significantly below TD peers on the speech perception task. Across both groups, velar fronting contrasts were the most challenging, whereas contrasts involving manner differences were identified more accurately. Within the SSD group, subgroup comparisons did not reach significance for overall accuracy or for most contrast types; however, a descriptive trend was observed whereby children with articulation disorder showed numerically higher accuracy than children with phonological delay and phonological disorder. A significant subgroup difference emerged specifically for the affricate stopping contrast, with children in the phonological disorder subgroup showing significantly lower accuracy than those in the articulation disorder subgroup.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The findings indicate that speech perception difficulties in SSD are contrast-dependent and preliminary evidence suggests that perceptual vulnerability for certain contrasts (specifically affricate stopping) may differ across SSD subtypes. Rather than reflecting a uniform perceptual deficit, perceptual vulnerability in SSD appears to be most pronounced for contrasts associated with common substitution patterns, with subtype-related differences observed for this specific contrast rather than uniformly across all contrasts tested.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS</h3>\n \n <div><i>What is already known on this subject</i>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li>Children with speech sound disorders (SSD) often demonstrate poorer speech perception than their typically developing peers, although findings across studies have been inconsistent. Prior research suggests that perceptual weaknesses in SSD may depend on task characteristics and the phonemic contrasts examined, with some evidence pointing to sound-specific difficulties aligned with children's production errors. In addition, SSD is a heterogeneous condition comprising distinct subtypes, such as articulation disorder, phonological delay, and phonological disorder, which differ in surface error patterns and underlying speech processing profiles. However, few studies have examined speech perception across SSD subtypes using contrasts that directly reflect common developmental substitution patterns, particularly in Korean-speaking children.</li>\n </ul><i>What this study adds to the existing knowledge</i>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li>This study demonstrates that speech perception difficulties in SSD are contrast-dependent rather than uniform and vary meaningfully across SSD subtypes. Using a minimal-pair identification task grounded in developmentally relevant Korean phonological contrasts, the findings show that children with articulation disorder exhibit relatively preserved perceptual sensitivity, whereas children with phonological delay and phonological disorder show reduced performance, with the weakest perception observed in phonological disorder. Importantly, subtype-related differences were evident even at the level of speech perception, extending previous Korean research that has focused primarily on downstream phonological processing measures. These results provide evidence that perceptual vulnerability contributes to the heterogeneity of SSD and aligns with subtype-specific loci of processing difficulty.</li>\n </ul><i>What are the clinical implications of this study?</i>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li>The findings highlight the value of incorporating speech perception assessment into the evaluation of children with SSD, particularly when differential diagnosis among SSD subtypes is considered. Perceptual assessment may be less critical for children with articulation disorder, whose difficulties appear largely output-based, but should be considered an essential component for children with phonological delay or phonological disorder. In particular, these findings underscore the relevance of speech perception for understanding heterogeneity in SSD, without implying uniform vulnerability across contrast types or children. A subtype-sensitive approach to speech perception assessment and intervention may support more precise clinical decision-making and more effective, individualized treatment planning.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49182,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","volume":"61 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1460-6984.70340","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Children with speech sound disorders (SSD) constitute a heterogeneous population, with speech difficulties arising from different loci within the speech processing system. Speech perception has long been implicated in SSD; however, previous findings remain mixed, partly due to differences in task demands and limited consideration of SSD subtypes. In particular, few studies have systematically examined speech perception across multiple contrast types that are explicitly structured around common developmental error patterns and across clinically defined SSD subgroups.

Aims

This study aimed to: (a) compare speech perception performance between children with SSD and typically developing (TD) peers across different phonological contrast types, and (b) examine whether children with articulation disorder, phonological delay, and phonological disorder exhibit distinct perceptual profiles that reflect subtype-specific characteristics.

Methods

Fifty-two Korean-speaking children aged 5–6 years participated (26 SSD; 26 TD). Speech perception was assessed using a minimal-pair identification task incorporating four substitution patterns frequently observed in Korean-speaking children: velar fronting, fricative stopping, affricate stopping, and affrication. Children with SSD were further classified into articulation disorder, phonological delay, and phonological disorder subgroups based on their surface error patterns. Group differences were analyzed in terms of overall accuracy and contrast-specific performance.

Results

Children with SSD performed significantly below TD peers on the speech perception task. Across both groups, velar fronting contrasts were the most challenging, whereas contrasts involving manner differences were identified more accurately. Within the SSD group, subgroup comparisons did not reach significance for overall accuracy or for most contrast types; however, a descriptive trend was observed whereby children with articulation disorder showed numerically higher accuracy than children with phonological delay and phonological disorder. A significant subgroup difference emerged specifically for the affricate stopping contrast, with children in the phonological disorder subgroup showing significantly lower accuracy than those in the articulation disorder subgroup.

Conclusions

The findings indicate that speech perception difficulties in SSD are contrast-dependent and preliminary evidence suggests that perceptual vulnerability for certain contrasts (specifically affricate stopping) may differ across SSD subtypes. Rather than reflecting a uniform perceptual deficit, perceptual vulnerability in SSD appears to be most pronounced for contrasts associated with common substitution patterns, with subtype-related differences observed for this specific contrast rather than uniformly across all contrasts tested.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on this subject
  • Children with speech sound disorders (SSD) often demonstrate poorer speech perception than their typically developing peers, although findings across studies have been inconsistent. Prior research suggests that perceptual weaknesses in SSD may depend on task characteristics and the phonemic contrasts examined, with some evidence pointing to sound-specific difficulties aligned with children's production errors. In addition, SSD is a heterogeneous condition comprising distinct subtypes, such as articulation disorder, phonological delay, and phonological disorder, which differ in surface error patterns and underlying speech processing profiles. However, few studies have examined speech perception across SSD subtypes using contrasts that directly reflect common developmental substitution patterns, particularly in Korean-speaking children.
What this study adds to the existing knowledge
  • This study demonstrates that speech perception difficulties in SSD are contrast-dependent rather than uniform and vary meaningfully across SSD subtypes. Using a minimal-pair identification task grounded in developmentally relevant Korean phonological contrasts, the findings show that children with articulation disorder exhibit relatively preserved perceptual sensitivity, whereas children with phonological delay and phonological disorder show reduced performance, with the weakest perception observed in phonological disorder. Importantly, subtype-related differences were evident even at the level of speech perception, extending previous Korean research that has focused primarily on downstream phonological processing measures. These results provide evidence that perceptual vulnerability contributes to the heterogeneity of SSD and aligns with subtype-specific loci of processing difficulty.
What are the clinical implications of this study?
  • The findings highlight the value of incorporating speech perception assessment into the evaluation of children with SSD, particularly when differential diagnosis among SSD subtypes is considered. Perceptual assessment may be less critical for children with articulation disorder, whose difficulties appear largely output-based, but should be considered an essential component for children with phonological delay or phonological disorder. In particular, these findings underscore the relevance of speech perception for understanding heterogeneity in SSD, without implying uniform vulnerability across contrast types or children. A subtype-sensitive approach to speech perception assessment and intervention may support more precise clinical decision-making and more effective, individualized treatment planning.
韩语语音障碍儿童的语言感知特征
语音障碍儿童是一个异质性的群体,其语音处理系统中不同的位点引起了语音障碍。语音感知长期以来与SSD有关;然而,先前的研究结果仍然是混合的,部分原因是任务需求的差异和对SSD亚型的考虑有限。特别是,很少有研究系统地检查了围绕常见发育错误模式和临床定义的SSD亚组明确构建的多种对比类型的语音感知。本研究旨在:(a)比较不同语音对比类型的SSD儿童和正常发育(TD)儿童的语音感知表现;(b)研究发音障碍、语音延迟和语音障碍儿童是否表现出不同的反映亚型特异性特征的感知特征。方法对52例5 ~ 6岁朝鲜语儿童进行调查,其中幼儿组26例,幼儿组26例。使用最小对识别任务来评估语音感知,该任务结合了在讲韩语的儿童中经常观察到的四种替代模式:舌状前置、摩擦停顿、打岔停顿和打岔。根据表面错误模式,将SSD儿童进一步分为发音障碍、语音延迟和语音障碍亚组。在总体准确性和对比特异性表现方面分析组间差异。结果SSD患儿在语音感知任务上的表现明显低于TD患儿。在两组中,正面的对比是最具挑战性的,而举止差异的对比则更准确。在SSD组中,亚组比较在总体准确性或大多数对比类型上没有达到显著性;然而,我们观察到一个描述性的趋势,即有发音障碍的儿童比有语音延迟和语音障碍的儿童表现出更高的数字准确性。一个显著的亚组差异特别出现在元音停止对比上,语音障碍亚组的孩子比发音障碍亚组的孩子表现出明显更低的准确性。研究结果表明,SSD患者的语音感知困难依赖于对比度,初步证据表明,不同类型的SSD患者对某些对比度(特别是打音停顿)的感知脆弱性可能不同。而不是反映统一的感知缺陷,SSD的感知脆弱性似乎在与常见替代模式相关的对比中最为明显,在这种特定对比中观察到与亚型相关的差异,而不是在所有测试的对比中一致。这篇论文补充了关于这一主题的已知内容:患有言语障碍(SSD)的儿童通常表现出比正常发育的同龄人更差的语言感知能力,尽管研究结果并不一致。先前的研究表明,SSD的感知弱点可能取决于任务特征和所检查的音位对比,一些证据表明,特定的声音困难与儿童的发音错误有关。此外,SSD是一种异质性疾病,包括不同的亚型,如发音障碍、语音延迟和语音障碍,它们在表面错误模式和潜在的语音处理特征上有所不同。然而,很少有研究使用直接反映常见发育替代模式的对比来检查SSD亚型的语言感知,特别是在讲韩语的儿童中。本研究表明,SSD的语音感知困难是对比依赖的,而不是统一的,并且在SSD亚型之间存在有意义的差异。通过基于与发展相关的韩语语音对比的最小对识别任务,研究结果表明,发音障碍儿童表现出相对保留的感知敏感性,而语音延迟和语音障碍儿童表现出较低的表现,语音障碍儿童的感知最弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (IJLCD) is the official journal of the Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists. The Journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of speech, language, communication disorders and speech and language therapy. It provides a forum for the exchange of information and discussion of issues of clinical or theoretical relevance in the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书