PVA Highlights Different Management Actions Required to Prevent Extinction in Fenced and Unfenced Populations of Reintroduced Western Quolls

IF 1.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Austral Ecology Pub Date : 2026-09-21 DOI:10.1111/aec.70289
Rebecca Schaefer, Katherine Tuft, Isabelle Onley, Kym Ottewell, Genevieve L. T. Hayes, Rob Brandle, Catherine Lynch, Katherine E. Moseby
{"title":"PVA Highlights Different Management Actions Required to Prevent Extinction in Fenced and Unfenced Populations of Reintroduced Western Quolls","authors":"Rebecca Schaefer,&nbsp;Katherine Tuft,&nbsp;Isabelle Onley,&nbsp;Kym Ottewell,&nbsp;Genevieve L. T. Hayes,&nbsp;Rob Brandle,&nbsp;Catherine Lynch,&nbsp;Katherine E. Moseby","doi":"10.1111/aec.70289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Population Viability Analysis (PVA) is a broad tool which can be used to estimate the likelihood of population persistence in translocated populations. We used PVA to evaluate the viability of two reintroduced populations of western quolls, a threatened marsupial carnivore, using population-specific parameters. Quolls were reintroduced to two sites in South Australia: Arid Recovery (AR), an arid cat- and fox-exclusion site comprised of a 12 300-ha fenced safe haven, and Ikara Flinders Ranges National Park (IFRNP), a 93 800-ha semi-arid unfenced conservation reserve where introduced predators were controlled through aerial baiting. We predicted that factors influencing population viability would vary significantly between the two sites due to the differences in release size area and predation risk. Site-specific genetic, mortality, and population size data of quolls were gathered and incorporated into the PVA. At the unfenced site, scenarios with higher carrying capacity and the lower rates of mortality recorded after aerial cat and fox baiting significantly reduced the probability of extinction (PE). Increases in juvenile mortality rate increased PE to a greater extent than the adult mortality rate. Increasing the size of the area under intensive cat and fox control was the management action most likely to result in a viable population through increasing carrying capacity. In comparison, at the fenced AR site, extinction risk was related to the small population size, and, despite higher survival, supplementation of extra individuals was deemed necessary to avoid extinction and inbreeding. Low mortality rates allowed for less frequent supplementation. Population harvesting from IFRNP of 21 individuals for up to 3 years did not significantly increase the risk to this population of inbreeding depression if carrying capacity was increased. These results demonstrate the need for different management strategies for different populations of the same species to avoid extinction within 100 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":8663,"journal":{"name":"Austral Ecology","volume":"51 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aec.70289","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.70289","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Population Viability Analysis (PVA) is a broad tool which can be used to estimate the likelihood of population persistence in translocated populations. We used PVA to evaluate the viability of two reintroduced populations of western quolls, a threatened marsupial carnivore, using population-specific parameters. Quolls were reintroduced to two sites in South Australia: Arid Recovery (AR), an arid cat- and fox-exclusion site comprised of a 12 300-ha fenced safe haven, and Ikara Flinders Ranges National Park (IFRNP), a 93 800-ha semi-arid unfenced conservation reserve where introduced predators were controlled through aerial baiting. We predicted that factors influencing population viability would vary significantly between the two sites due to the differences in release size area and predation risk. Site-specific genetic, mortality, and population size data of quolls were gathered and incorporated into the PVA. At the unfenced site, scenarios with higher carrying capacity and the lower rates of mortality recorded after aerial cat and fox baiting significantly reduced the probability of extinction (PE). Increases in juvenile mortality rate increased PE to a greater extent than the adult mortality rate. Increasing the size of the area under intensive cat and fox control was the management action most likely to result in a viable population through increasing carrying capacity. In comparison, at the fenced AR site, extinction risk was related to the small population size, and, despite higher survival, supplementation of extra individuals was deemed necessary to avoid extinction and inbreeding. Low mortality rates allowed for less frequent supplementation. Population harvesting from IFRNP of 21 individuals for up to 3 years did not significantly increase the risk to this population of inbreeding depression if carrying capacity was increased. These results demonstrate the need for different management strategies for different populations of the same species to avoid extinction within 100 years.

PVA强调了在重新引入的围栏和非围栏种群中防止灭绝所需的不同管理行动
种群生存力分析(PVA)是一种广泛的工具,可用于估计迁移种群中种群持续存在的可能性。采用PVA方法,利用种群特异性参数对西部袋鼬(一种受威胁的有袋类食肉动物)两个重新引入种群的生存能力进行了评估。在南澳大利亚的两个地点重新引入了袋鼬:干旱恢复(AR),一个干旱的猫和狐狸被禁止的地点,由一个12 300公顷的围栏安全避难所组成,以及伊卡拉弗林德斯山脉国家公园(IFRNP),一个93 800公顷的半干旱围栏保护保护区,通过空中诱饵控制引入的捕食者。我们预测,由于放生面积和捕食风险的差异,影响种群生存能力的因素在两个地点之间存在显著差异。收集了特定地点的遗传、死亡率和种群大小数据,并将其纳入PVA。在未设置围栏的地点,空中猫和狐狸诱捕后所记录的较高承载能力和较低死亡率显著降低了灭绝概率(PE)。与成人死亡率相比,青少年死亡率的增加对PE的影响更大。在加强猫和狐的控制下,扩大面积是最可能通过增加承载能力而获得存活种群的管理措施。相比之下,在围栏AR地点,灭绝风险与种群规模小有关,尽管存活率较高,但补充额外的个体被认为是避免灭绝和近亲繁殖的必要条件。低死亡率允许较少的补充频率。如果携带能力增加,从IFRNP中收获21个个体长达3年的种群不会显著增加该种群近交衰退的风险。这些结果表明,需要对同一物种的不同种群采取不同的管理策略,以避免在100年内灭绝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Austral Ecology
Austral Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Austral Ecology is the premier journal for basic and applied ecology in the Southern Hemisphere. As the official Journal of The Ecological Society of Australia (ESA), Austral Ecology addresses the commonality between ecosystems in Australia and many parts of southern Africa, South America, New Zealand and Oceania. For example many species in the unique biotas of these regions share common Gondwana ancestors. ESA''s aim is to publish innovative research to encourage the sharing of information and experiences that enrich the understanding of the ecology of the Southern Hemisphere. Austral Ecology involves an editorial board with representatives from Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, Brazil and Argentina. These representatives provide expert opinions, access to qualified reviewers and act as a focus for attracting a wide range of contributions from countries across the region. Austral Ecology publishes original papers describing experimental, observational or theoretical studies on terrestrial, marine or freshwater systems, which are considered without taxonomic bias. Special thematic issues are published regularly, including symposia on the ecology of estuaries and soft sediment habitats, freshwater systems and coral reef fish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书