Bridging historical antigenic profiling and whole-genome taxonomy in Rickettsia.

Scientific reviews Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-14 DOI:10.1038/s44573-026-00004-2
Aticha Lhokaew, Elizabeth M Batty, Stuart D Blacksell
{"title":"Bridging historical antigenic profiling and whole-genome taxonomy in <i>Rickettsia</i>.","authors":"Aticha Lhokaew, Elizabeth M Batty, Stuart D Blacksell","doi":"10.1038/s44573-026-00004-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Historically, rickettsial diseases were classified primarily through antigenic profiling and serotyping, an approach that was later superseded by molecular taxonomy and phylogenetics. Recent advances in whole-genome sequencing (WGS) have revealed substantial taxonomic ambiguity within the genus <i>Rickettsia</i>, including nomenclatural redundancy and inconsistent species delineation, raising questions about the adequacy of current classification criteria for obligate intracellular bacteria. In parallel, long-standing serological data demonstrate extensive, structured antigenic relationships that have not been fully explored within modern genomic frameworks. In this review, we re-examine historical antigenic profiling in the context of contemporary WGS-based taxonomy and concordance between serological cross-reactivity and genetic relatedness across <i>Rickettsia</i> groups, particularly within and between the spotted fever, transitional, and typhus groups. Integrating antigenic and genomic data provides a polyphasic perspective that may aid in resolving current taxonomic uncertainty and has direct implications for serological diagnosis, antigen selection, and future taxonomic proposals. We argue that revisiting antigenic data alongside genomic metrics is essential to developing a coherent, biologically meaningful framework for <i>Rickettsia</i> classification.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s44573-026-00004-2.</p>","PeriodicalId":524225,"journal":{"name":"Scientific reviews","volume":"1 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13602854/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44573-026-00004-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Historically, rickettsial diseases were classified primarily through antigenic profiling and serotyping, an approach that was later superseded by molecular taxonomy and phylogenetics. Recent advances in whole-genome sequencing (WGS) have revealed substantial taxonomic ambiguity within the genus Rickettsia, including nomenclatural redundancy and inconsistent species delineation, raising questions about the adequacy of current classification criteria for obligate intracellular bacteria. In parallel, long-standing serological data demonstrate extensive, structured antigenic relationships that have not been fully explored within modern genomic frameworks. In this review, we re-examine historical antigenic profiling in the context of contemporary WGS-based taxonomy and concordance between serological cross-reactivity and genetic relatedness across Rickettsia groups, particularly within and between the spotted fever, transitional, and typhus groups. Integrating antigenic and genomic data provides a polyphasic perspective that may aid in resolving current taxonomic uncertainty and has direct implications for serological diagnosis, antigen selection, and future taxonomic proposals. We argue that revisiting antigenic data alongside genomic metrics is essential to developing a coherent, biologically meaningful framework for Rickettsia classification.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s44573-026-00004-2.

架起立克次体历史抗原分析和全基因组分类的桥梁。
历史上,立克次体疾病主要通过抗原谱分析和血清分型进行分类,这种方法后来被分子分类学和系统发育学所取代。全基因组测序(WGS)的最新进展揭示了立克次体属的大量分类歧义,包括命名冗余和不一致的物种描述,这对目前专性细胞内细菌分类标准的充分性提出了质疑。同时,长期存在的血清学数据表明,在现代基因组框架内尚未充分探索的广泛的、结构化的抗原关系。在这篇综述中,我们在当代基于wgs的分类和立克次体群之间血清学交叉反应性和遗传亲缘关系的背景下重新研究历史抗原谱,特别是在斑疹热、过渡性和斑疹伤寒群内部和之间。整合抗原和基因组数据提供了多相视角,可能有助于解决当前分类学的不确定性,并对血清学诊断、抗原选择和未来分类学建议具有直接意义。我们认为,重新审视抗原数据与基因组指标是必不可少的发展一个连贯的,有生物学意义的框架立克次体分类。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,可在https://doi.org/10.1038/s44573-026-00004-2上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书