Safety of Pulsed Field Ablation: Established Evidence, Emerging Risks, and Knowledge Gaps.

IF 1.3
Dakota de Cecco, Jeanne du Fay de Lavallaz, Boldizsar Kovacs, Jackson J Liang
{"title":"Safety of Pulsed Field Ablation: Established Evidence, Emerging Risks, and Knowledge Gaps.","authors":"Dakota de Cecco, Jeanne du Fay de Lavallaz, Boldizsar Kovacs, Jackson J Liang","doi":"10.1111/pace.70446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has rapidly emerged as an important ablation technology for atrial arrhythmias and is increasingly being explored for ventricular arrhythmias. As clinical experience expands, a precise understanding of its safety profile is essential. This review summarizes contemporary evidence on the safety of PFA, distinguishes procedure-related complications from those attributable to electroporation, and highlights areas in which evidence remains limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":520740,"journal":{"name":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has rapidly emerged as an important ablation technology for atrial arrhythmias and is increasingly being explored for ventricular arrhythmias. As clinical experience expands, a precise understanding of its safety profile is essential. This review summarizes contemporary evidence on the safety of PFA, distinguishes procedure-related complications from those attributable to electroporation, and highlights areas in which evidence remains limited.

脉冲场消融的安全性:已建立的证据、新出现的风险和知识空白。
脉冲场消融(PFA)已迅速成为房性心律失常的重要消融技术,并越来越多地被用于室性心律失常的治疗。随着临床经验的扩大,对其安全性的精确理解是至关重要的。本综述总结了关于PFA安全性的当代证据,区分了与手术相关的并发症与可归因于电穿孔的并发症,并强调了证据仍然有限的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书