SDOH Data as Health Care Data: The Multifaceted, Evolving, and Consequential Role of Law and Policy.

Advances in health information science and practice Pub Date : 2026-09-01 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.63116/AH.000000006
Rachel Landauer, Erika Hanson, Kathryn Garfield, Sara Raza, Carmel Shachar
{"title":"SDOH Data as Health Care Data: The Multifaceted, Evolving, and Consequential Role of Law and Policy.","authors":"Rachel Landauer, Erika Hanson, Kathryn Garfield, Sara Raza, Carmel Shachar","doi":"10.63116/AH.000000006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social determinants of health (SDOH) are increasingly recognized as vital factors shaping health outcomes in the United States. With escalating integration of SDOH data into health information platforms, questions arise about appropriate regulation to both enable data-driven care and protect against potential harms. This article reviews the current regulatory landscape governing SDOH data within the US health care system, with an emphasis on identifying critical tensions, policy strategies, and gaps salient for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scan to identify federal and state regulatory activity pertaining to SDOH data within the health care contexts. We synthesized these sources to map the current landscape and tease out emerging themes.</p><p><strong>Results/discussion: </strong>We identified 3 core areas of relevant regulation: (1) data standardization, interoperability, and exchange; (2) information privacy and security; and (3) oversight of advanced analytics, including artificial intelligence applications. Authorities actively wrestle with several key regulatory design questions, including: (1) whether to treat SDOH data created, collected, maintained, and used in or by health care settings in the same way as any other type of health information; (2) effective levers to promote desired policy outcomes; and (3) the rightsized jurisdictional balance between federal and state enforcement. Variations in decisions at these crossroads are entrenching the health care system in a scenario in which SDOH data exchange is more clearly part of the new standard of care in some states than others, and in which SDOH data is more protected in some states than others.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings speak to the importance of cultivating a regulatory environment for SDOH data within the health care sector that is not only responsive to the current realities of the field but also responsive to rapid evolution and resilient to future challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":521055,"journal":{"name":"Advances in health information science and practice","volume":"2 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13598768/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in health information science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.63116/AH.000000006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social determinants of health (SDOH) are increasingly recognized as vital factors shaping health outcomes in the United States. With escalating integration of SDOH data into health information platforms, questions arise about appropriate regulation to both enable data-driven care and protect against potential harms. This article reviews the current regulatory landscape governing SDOH data within the US health care system, with an emphasis on identifying critical tensions, policy strategies, and gaps salient for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers.

Methods: We conducted a scan to identify federal and state regulatory activity pertaining to SDOH data within the health care contexts. We synthesized these sources to map the current landscape and tease out emerging themes.

Results/discussion: We identified 3 core areas of relevant regulation: (1) data standardization, interoperability, and exchange; (2) information privacy and security; and (3) oversight of advanced analytics, including artificial intelligence applications. Authorities actively wrestle with several key regulatory design questions, including: (1) whether to treat SDOH data created, collected, maintained, and used in or by health care settings in the same way as any other type of health information; (2) effective levers to promote desired policy outcomes; and (3) the rightsized jurisdictional balance between federal and state enforcement. Variations in decisions at these crossroads are entrenching the health care system in a scenario in which SDOH data exchange is more clearly part of the new standard of care in some states than others, and in which SDOH data is more protected in some states than others.

Conclusion: Findings speak to the importance of cultivating a regulatory environment for SDOH data within the health care sector that is not only responsive to the current realities of the field but also responsive to rapid evolution and resilient to future challenges.

SDOH数据作为卫生保健数据:法律和政策的多面性、演变和后续作用。
背景:在美国,健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)越来越被认为是影响健康结果的重要因素。随着SDOH数据逐步整合到卫生信息平台中,出现了有关适当监管的问题,既要实现数据驱动的护理,又要防止潜在危害。本文回顾了美国卫生保健系统中管理SDOH数据的当前监管格局,重点是确定政策制定者、从业者和研究人员面临的关键紧张局势、政策策略和差距。方法:我们进行了一次扫描,以确定与卫生保健背景下SDOH数据相关的联邦和州监管活动。我们综合了这些资源来绘制当前的景观并梳理出新兴的主题。结果/讨论:我们确定了相关法规的3个核心领域:(1)数据标准化、互操作性和交换;(2)信息隐私和安全;(3)监督高级分析,包括人工智能应用。当局正在积极解决几个关键的监管设计问题,包括:(1)是否以与任何其他类型的健康信息相同的方式对待卫生保健机构或由卫生保健机构创建、收集、维护和使用的SDOH数据;(2)促进预期政策结果的有效杠杆;(3)联邦和州执法之间适当的司法平衡。在这些十字路口的决策变化正在巩固卫生保健系统,在这种情况下,SDOH数据交换在某些州比其他州更明显地成为新的护理标准的一部分,并且SDOH数据在某些州比其他州更受保护。结论:研究结果表明,在医疗保健部门为SDOH数据培养一个监管环境的重要性,该环境不仅要响应该领域的当前现实,而且要响应快速发展并适应未来的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书