Development and validation of a prior-to-admission medication list risk scoring tool.

IF 2.3
Scott D Nelson, Mollie Hobensack, L Montana Fleenor, Lauren McCluggage, Halden Z VanCleave, Allison B McCoy, Wing Liu, Adam Wright
{"title":"Development and validation of a prior-to-admission medication list risk scoring tool.","authors":"Scott D Nelson, Mollie Hobensack, L Montana Fleenor, Lauren McCluggage, Halden Z VanCleave, Allison B McCoy, Wing Liu, Adam Wright","doi":"10.1093/ajhp/zxag311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop, validate, and implement an admission predictive model that estimates the likelihood and expected number of changes to the prior-to-admission (PTA) medication list, to help triage pharmacy-led medication histories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective study of adult admissions at a large academic medical center (2019-2025). Using electronic health record (EHR) data available at admission, we built a 2-stage (\"hurdle\") gradient-boosted tree model: Stage 1 predicts whether any PTA list changes will occur; stage 2 predicts the number of changes among encounters with 1 or more changes. The primary outcome was a weighted count of PTA list changes (additions, deletions, and modifications), with triple weight for prespecified high-risk medication classes. We evaluated discrimination, calibration, count error, and capacity-aware ranking (eg, precision at 25%, capture at 25%). Fairness analyses examined performance across age, sex at birth, and race.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 402,023 encounters, 33.1% had no PTA medication list discrepancies. Stage 1 achieved an area under the curve of 0.816 and an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.886; probability calibration was acceptable (log loss, 0.479; Brier score, 0.15). For stage 2, the mean absolute error was 3.6 and the root mean square error (RMSE) was 5.2; log1p-RMSE was 0.63. Under a 25% review capacity, precision was 90.6% and capture was 57.4% (normalized discounted cumulative gain was 0.762).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A 2-stage, calibration-aware model using admission-available EHR data can effectively prioritize patients who are most likely to need pharmacist-obtained medication histories, supporting more efficient use of scarce pharmacy resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":520552,"journal":{"name":"American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxag311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To develop, validate, and implement an admission predictive model that estimates the likelihood and expected number of changes to the prior-to-admission (PTA) medication list, to help triage pharmacy-led medication histories.

Methods: We performed a retrospective study of adult admissions at a large academic medical center (2019-2025). Using electronic health record (EHR) data available at admission, we built a 2-stage ("hurdle") gradient-boosted tree model: Stage 1 predicts whether any PTA list changes will occur; stage 2 predicts the number of changes among encounters with 1 or more changes. The primary outcome was a weighted count of PTA list changes (additions, deletions, and modifications), with triple weight for prespecified high-risk medication classes. We evaluated discrimination, calibration, count error, and capacity-aware ranking (eg, precision at 25%, capture at 25%). Fairness analyses examined performance across age, sex at birth, and race.

Results: Among 402,023 encounters, 33.1% had no PTA medication list discrepancies. Stage 1 achieved an area under the curve of 0.816 and an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.886; probability calibration was acceptable (log loss, 0.479; Brier score, 0.15). For stage 2, the mean absolute error was 3.6 and the root mean square error (RMSE) was 5.2; log1p-RMSE was 0.63. Under a 25% review capacity, precision was 90.6% and capture was 57.4% (normalized discounted cumulative gain was 0.762).

Conclusion: A 2-stage, calibration-aware model using admission-available EHR data can effectively prioritize patients who are most likely to need pharmacist-obtained medication histories, supporting more efficient use of scarce pharmacy resources.

开发和验证入院前用药清单风险评分工具。
目的:开发、验证和实施一个入院预测模型,该模型可以估计入院前(PTA)药物清单变化的可能性和预期数量,以帮助对药房主导的用药史进行分类。方法:我们对一家大型学术医疗中心(2019-2025)的成人入院情况进行了回顾性研究。利用入院时可用的电子健康记录(EHR)数据,我们建立了一个两阶段(“障碍”)梯度增强树模型:第一阶段预测PTA列表是否会发生变化;阶段2预测在遇到一个或多个变化时的变化数量。主要结果是PTA列表变化(增加、删除和修改)的加权计数,预先指定的高危药物类别的权重为三倍。我们评估了鉴别、校准、计数误差和能力感知排序(例如,精确度为25%,捕获率为25%)。公平分析考察了不同年龄、出生性别和种族的表现。结果:在402,023例就诊中,33.1%的患者没有PTA用药清单差异。阶段1的曲线下面积为0.816,精密度-召回率曲线下面积为0.886;概率校正可接受(对数损失0.479;Brier评分0.15)。第2阶段,平均绝对误差为3.6,均方根误差(RMSE)为5.2;log1 - rmse为0.63。在25%的审查能力下,精确度为90.6%,捕获率为57.4%(标准化贴现累积增益为0.762)。结论:利用入院时可获得的电子病历数据建立的两阶段、校准感知模型可以有效地优先考虑最有可能需要药剂师获得的用药史的患者,从而支持更有效地利用稀缺的药房资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书