Exploring the Use and Evaluation of Glyphs in Visual Analytics Applications.

IF 6.5
Shiyi Liu, Jiayi Hong, Ross Maciejewski
{"title":"Exploring the Use and Evaluation of Glyphs in Visual Analytics Applications.","authors":"Shiyi Liu, Jiayi Hong, Ross Maciejewski","doi":"10.1109/TVCG.2026.3734118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glyph-based visualizations are widely used in visual analytics (VA) systems, where data glyphs act as data-driven visual entities that use multiple visual channels to encode multivariate data attributes. In modern VA systems, many glyphs are no longer based on a single design form, such as a single circular or radial design. We refer to those designs as composite glyphs, where a glyph is divided into multiple parts and each part uses a different visual design to encode a subset of the data. While prior work has studied glyph design principles and visual encodings, less is known about how glyphs are designed and evaluated in application-driven VA systems. In this paper, we present a systematic review of glyph-based visualizations in VA systems over the past decade. We analyze 69 papers published between 2015 and 2024 in major visualization and HCI venues, including IEEE VIS, IEEE TVCG, EuroVis, and CHI, covering 86 distinct glyph designs across diverse application domains. We analyze these glyphs along two aspects. The first is the design space, including glyph design types, combination patterns, chart contexts, supported tasks, and application scenarios. The second is verification and evaluation, including the use of design alternatives, case studies, and expert interviews or user studies. Our analysis reveals recurring patterns in how glyphs are constructed, combined, and evaluated in practice. Based on these observations, we identify five gaps in current practice and outline corresponding directions for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":94035,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2026.3734118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Glyph-based visualizations are widely used in visual analytics (VA) systems, where data glyphs act as data-driven visual entities that use multiple visual channels to encode multivariate data attributes. In modern VA systems, many glyphs are no longer based on a single design form, such as a single circular or radial design. We refer to those designs as composite glyphs, where a glyph is divided into multiple parts and each part uses a different visual design to encode a subset of the data. While prior work has studied glyph design principles and visual encodings, less is known about how glyphs are designed and evaluated in application-driven VA systems. In this paper, we present a systematic review of glyph-based visualizations in VA systems over the past decade. We analyze 69 papers published between 2015 and 2024 in major visualization and HCI venues, including IEEE VIS, IEEE TVCG, EuroVis, and CHI, covering 86 distinct glyph designs across diverse application domains. We analyze these glyphs along two aspects. The first is the design space, including glyph design types, combination patterns, chart contexts, supported tasks, and application scenarios. The second is verification and evaluation, including the use of design alternatives, case studies, and expert interviews or user studies. Our analysis reveals recurring patterns in how glyphs are constructed, combined, and evaluated in practice. Based on these observations, we identify five gaps in current practice and outline corresponding directions for future research.

探索字形在视觉分析应用程序中的使用和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书