Simulation training in Canadian College of Family Physicians Emergency Medicine (CCFP-EM) programs.

IF 2
CJEM Pub Date : 2026-09-25 DOI:10.1007/s43678-026-01268-2
Aajab Abdulhussein, Susan Humphrey-Murto, Avik Nath, Warren J Cheung, Andrew K Hall
{"title":"Simulation training in Canadian College of Family Physicians Emergency Medicine (CCFP-EM) programs.","authors":"Aajab Abdulhussein, Susan Humphrey-Murto, Avik Nath, Warren J Cheung, Andrew K Hall","doi":"10.1007/s43678-026-01268-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Canadian College of Family Physicians Emergency Medicine (CCFP-EM) program offers 1 year of enhanced emergency training following a 2-year family medicine residency. Due to limited training time and unpredictable exposure to high-acuity scenarios, simulation-based education plays a critical role in developing procedural and crisis resource management competencies. This study aimed to characterize simulation use across Canadian CCFP-EM programs, with objectives to 1) describe the volume and delivery of simulation programs, 2) outline curricular content, and 3) explore how simulation is used for assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From June 2023 to January 2024, we interviewed 16 out of 17 program representatives from Canadian CCFP-EM programs. Data were collected via both a pre-interview survey and a semi-structured interview. Program representatives included program directors, assistant program directors, or simulation directors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All programs reported access to a simulation center, with 25% offering remote or virtual simulation. The median simulation hours provided across programs was 42 h annually, with individual residents participating 40 h on average. Most programs covered core national emergency medicine simulation topics, obtaining cases from their own case bank, or using open-access simulation resources. Most program representatives supported developing a standardized national simulation curriculum, emphasizing the need for flexibility for local adaptation. Only 31% of programs used simulation for assessment, citing concerns over psychological safety, feasibility and standardization. Faculty time and cost were the most cited barriers to simulation in general. Notable innovations included disaster simulations, resident-led peer teaching, and specialist-assisted procedural curriculum.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results provide a starting point for discussion and collaboration across programs, creating opportunities to optimize curricular development and the use of simulation for assessment, while considering resource availability and learner psychological safety. Simulation-based education has been a key educational tool, and educators and program leaders must understand how we are using simulation to teach our residents.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-026-01268-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The Canadian College of Family Physicians Emergency Medicine (CCFP-EM) program offers 1 year of enhanced emergency training following a 2-year family medicine residency. Due to limited training time and unpredictable exposure to high-acuity scenarios, simulation-based education plays a critical role in developing procedural and crisis resource management competencies. This study aimed to characterize simulation use across Canadian CCFP-EM programs, with objectives to 1) describe the volume and delivery of simulation programs, 2) outline curricular content, and 3) explore how simulation is used for assessment.

Methods: From June 2023 to January 2024, we interviewed 16 out of 17 program representatives from Canadian CCFP-EM programs. Data were collected via both a pre-interview survey and a semi-structured interview. Program representatives included program directors, assistant program directors, or simulation directors.

Results: All programs reported access to a simulation center, with 25% offering remote or virtual simulation. The median simulation hours provided across programs was 42 h annually, with individual residents participating 40 h on average. Most programs covered core national emergency medicine simulation topics, obtaining cases from their own case bank, or using open-access simulation resources. Most program representatives supported developing a standardized national simulation curriculum, emphasizing the need for flexibility for local adaptation. Only 31% of programs used simulation for assessment, citing concerns over psychological safety, feasibility and standardization. Faculty time and cost were the most cited barriers to simulation in general. Notable innovations included disaster simulations, resident-led peer teaching, and specialist-assisted procedural curriculum.

Conclusion: Our results provide a starting point for discussion and collaboration across programs, creating opportunities to optimize curricular development and the use of simulation for assessment, while considering resource availability and learner psychological safety. Simulation-based education has been a key educational tool, and educators and program leaders must understand how we are using simulation to teach our residents.

加拿大家庭医生学院急诊医学(CCFP-EM)项目的模拟训练。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书