Access and Attrition Across Audiology and Cochlear Implant Care Among Older Adults with Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

IF 1.3
Otology & neurotology open Pub Date : 2026-08-11 eCollection Date: 2026-09-01 DOI:10.1097/ONO.0000000000000096
Payal V Patel, Varun Gopal, Divya Patel, Ryan G Porter
{"title":"Access and Attrition Across Audiology and Cochlear Implant Care Among Older Adults with Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss.","authors":"Payal V Patel, Varun Gopal, Divya Patel, Ryan G Porter","doi":"10.1097/ONO.0000000000000096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify progression through the hearing care pathway among US adults aged ≥65 years with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and describe variation across geographic and community contexts.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Epic Cosmos Database, January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2024.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults aged ≥65 years with bilateral SNHL identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Stage-specific unadjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for progression across audiology evaluation, cochlear implant evaluation, and cochlear implantation. Statistical significance was defined as <i>P</i> < 0.05, with <i>P</i> < 0.001 considered a strong signal given the large sample size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1,461,489 older adults with bilateral SNHL, 746,118 (51.1%) underwent audiology evaluation; fewer than 2% received cochlear implant candidacy evaluation, while approximately 64% of those evaluated for cochlear implantation proceeded to surgery. Marked stage-specific attrition was observed. Adults aged 85 years or older had lower odds of audiology access, higher odds of candidacy evaluation, and lower odds of cochlear implantation. Black and Asian patients had lower odds of candidacy evaluation. Women were less likely to undergo candidacy evaluation but more likely to receive implantation once evaluated for candidacy. Patients living farther from a cochlear implant center and those in rural areas had higher odds of both candidacy evaluation and cochlear implantation, a counterintuitive finding that likely reflects a selection effect among patients who overcome distance barriers rather than improved geographic access.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this national cohort, disparities along the cochlear implant care pathway were associated less with audiologic access due to distance and more with attrition at cochlear implant candidacy assessment. Candidacy referral and evaluation represent a critical, potentially modifiable bottleneck for improving equity in hearing care among older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":74382,"journal":{"name":"Otology & neurotology open","volume":"6 3","pages":"e096"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13610227/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & neurotology open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ONO.0000000000000096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To quantify progression through the hearing care pathway among US adults aged ≥65 years with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and describe variation across geographic and community contexts.

Study design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Epic Cosmos Database, January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2024.

Patients: Adults aged ≥65 years with bilateral SNHL identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes.

Main outcomes and measures: Stage-specific unadjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for progression across audiology evaluation, cochlear implant evaluation, and cochlear implantation. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05, with P < 0.001 considered a strong signal given the large sample size.

Results: Among 1,461,489 older adults with bilateral SNHL, 746,118 (51.1%) underwent audiology evaluation; fewer than 2% received cochlear implant candidacy evaluation, while approximately 64% of those evaluated for cochlear implantation proceeded to surgery. Marked stage-specific attrition was observed. Adults aged 85 years or older had lower odds of audiology access, higher odds of candidacy evaluation, and lower odds of cochlear implantation. Black and Asian patients had lower odds of candidacy evaluation. Women were less likely to undergo candidacy evaluation but more likely to receive implantation once evaluated for candidacy. Patients living farther from a cochlear implant center and those in rural areas had higher odds of both candidacy evaluation and cochlear implantation, a counterintuitive finding that likely reflects a selection effect among patients who overcome distance barriers rather than improved geographic access.

Conclusions: In this national cohort, disparities along the cochlear implant care pathway were associated less with audiologic access due to distance and more with attrition at cochlear implant candidacy assessment. Candidacy referral and evaluation represent a critical, potentially modifiable bottleneck for improving equity in hearing care among older adults.

老年双侧感音神经性听力损失患者听力学和人工耳蜗护理的获取和损耗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书