Comparative Efficacy of Embolic Agents for Single-Session Meningeal Artery Embolization and Surgical Evacuation: Evaluating Liquids, Particles, and Adjunct Coils.

IF 1.4
Immaculate Christie, Diego Pichardo-Rojas, Santiago Gomez-Paz, Kent R Richter, Margaret McGrath, Jeffrey M Breton, Samuel H Wakelin, Nicholas Kendall, Alana M McNulty, Alexandra R Paul, Ahmed Aljuboori, Philipp Hendrix, Gregory M Weiner, Edward A M Duckworth, Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Visish M Srinivasan, Brian T Jankowitz, Thomas Snyder, Michael R Levitt, Rocco Armonda, Daniel R Felbaum, Mohamed M Salem, Ramesh Grandhi
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy of Embolic Agents for Single-Session Meningeal Artery Embolization and Surgical Evacuation: Evaluating Liquids, Particles, and Adjunct Coils.","authors":"Immaculate Christie, Diego Pichardo-Rojas, Santiago Gomez-Paz, Kent R Richter, Margaret McGrath, Jeffrey M Breton, Samuel H Wakelin, Nicholas Kendall, Alana M McNulty, Alexandra R Paul, Ahmed Aljuboori, Philipp Hendrix, Gregory M Weiner, Edward A M Duckworth, Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Visish M Srinivasan, Brian T Jankowitz, Thomas Snyder, Michael R Levitt, Rocco Armonda, Daniel R Felbaum, Mohamed M Salem, Ramesh Grandhi","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000002201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Single-session middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) combined with surgical evacuation is an emerging strategy for management of patients with chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). However, comparative outcome data based on embolic material selection in this setting remain limited. We compared clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes of patients treated with cSDH using liquid or particle embolic agents and evaluated the effect of adjunctive coil use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of consecutive adults undergoing single-session MMAE with surgical evacuation for cSDH. Outcomes were compared by embolic material (liquid vs particle) using 1:1 propensity score matching. The impact of adjunctive coiling was assessed in the overall cohort. Associations were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and reported as odds ratios with 95% CIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 268 identified patients, 100 (50 liquid and 50 particle) were propensity-score matched for analysis. Rates of improved or stable functional status at last follow-up were similar between liquid (79.2%) and particle embolization (72.5%) groups (P = .701), as were ≥50% hematoma reduction (66.0% vs 72.0%, P = .464), postoperative complications (6.0% vs 8.0%, P = .672), and all-cause mortality (14.0% vs 14.0%, P = .951). Particle embolization was associated with a higher rate of needing any re-evacuation (20.0% vs 6.0%; adjusted odds ratio 5.13, 95% CI = 1.12-23.42, P = .035). Adjunct coiling lengthened procedure duration (203 [187-269] vs 198 [163-232] minutes, P = .019) without significant differences in clinical, radiographic, or adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients undergoing single-session MMAE with surgical evacuation for cSDH, liquid and particle embolic agents demonstrated comparable safety and functional and radiographic efficacy. However, liquid embolization was associated with significantly fewer reinterventions. Adjunctive coiling lengthened procedural time without differences in clinical or radiographic outcomes. Prospective comparative studies are needed to further define the role of embolic material and technical factors in patients undergoing evacuation and MMAE.</p>","PeriodicalId":520730,"journal":{"name":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000002201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Single-session middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) combined with surgical evacuation is an emerging strategy for management of patients with chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). However, comparative outcome data based on embolic material selection in this setting remain limited. We compared clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes of patients treated with cSDH using liquid or particle embolic agents and evaluated the effect of adjunctive coil use.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of consecutive adults undergoing single-session MMAE with surgical evacuation for cSDH. Outcomes were compared by embolic material (liquid vs particle) using 1:1 propensity score matching. The impact of adjunctive coiling was assessed in the overall cohort. Associations were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and reported as odds ratios with 95% CIs.

Results: Among 268 identified patients, 100 (50 liquid and 50 particle) were propensity-score matched for analysis. Rates of improved or stable functional status at last follow-up were similar between liquid (79.2%) and particle embolization (72.5%) groups (P = .701), as were ≥50% hematoma reduction (66.0% vs 72.0%, P = .464), postoperative complications (6.0% vs 8.0%, P = .672), and all-cause mortality (14.0% vs 14.0%, P = .951). Particle embolization was associated with a higher rate of needing any re-evacuation (20.0% vs 6.0%; adjusted odds ratio 5.13, 95% CI = 1.12-23.42, P = .035). Adjunct coiling lengthened procedure duration (203 [187-269] vs 198 [163-232] minutes, P = .019) without significant differences in clinical, radiographic, or adverse outcomes.

Conclusion: In patients undergoing single-session MMAE with surgical evacuation for cSDH, liquid and particle embolic agents demonstrated comparable safety and functional and radiographic efficacy. However, liquid embolization was associated with significantly fewer reinterventions. Adjunctive coiling lengthened procedural time without differences in clinical or radiographic outcomes. Prospective comparative studies are needed to further define the role of embolic material and technical factors in patients undergoing evacuation and MMAE.

栓塞剂在单次脑膜动脉栓塞和手术引流中的比较疗效:评估液体、颗粒和辅助线圈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书