Role of General Practitioners in European Health Technology Assessment, EU-HTA Innovation in Oncology as an Example.

Q2 Medicine
Daniel Widmer, Hermenegildo Marcos Carrera, Jörg Ruof, Gunasekara Vidanamestrige Chamath Fernando, Patrick Ouvrard, Marie-Christine Bonnamour, Mary McCarthy, Shrikant Atreya
{"title":"Role of General Practitioners in European Health Technology Assessment, EU-HTA Innovation in Oncology as an Example.","authors":"Daniel Widmer, Hermenegildo Marcos Carrera, Jörg Ruof, Gunasekara Vidanamestrige Chamath Fernando, Patrick Ouvrard, Marie-Christine Bonnamour, Mary McCarthy, Shrikant Atreya","doi":"10.3390/jmahp14030057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Different from established clinical guideline workstreams, the participation of general practitioners (GPs) in the health technology assessment (HTA) process at the European level is new. There is a research gap in this domain. The European Union of General Practitioners (UEMO) is the political association of GPs in Europe and has been collaborating as a stakeholder in the creation of the European Regulation on HTA since 2017. The aim of our research is to provide a framework for GPs'role in EU HTA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mixed methods: questionnaire and focus groups.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Representatives of national medical/GP associations of 17 Member States of the EU and five EU non-member countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most respondents supported GP involvement in the development of clinical recommendations relevant to general practice. Respondents emphasized that UEMO must turn to WONCA-Europe, the academic society of GPs, when scientific input is required. Among the ten priority topics for HTA in oncology, four emerged as most relevant for the GPs: 1. Conscientious prescription of interventions considering over- and under-medicalization, 2. establishing a system for continuity of care integrating palliative care, 3. ensuring evidence-based medicine, and 4. promoting collaborative care and considering workload.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>The GP can contribute to the debate by defending these four priorities. Presenting the difficulties in this debate can contribute to a better understanding of the implementation of new technology in the real world.</p>","PeriodicalId":73811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of market access & health policy","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13608814/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of market access & health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jmahp14030057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Different from established clinical guideline workstreams, the participation of general practitioners (GPs) in the health technology assessment (HTA) process at the European level is new. There is a research gap in this domain. The European Union of General Practitioners (UEMO) is the political association of GPs in Europe and has been collaborating as a stakeholder in the creation of the European Regulation on HTA since 2017. The aim of our research is to provide a framework for GPs'role in EU HTA.

Methods: Mixed methods: questionnaire and focus groups.

Participants: Representatives of national medical/GP associations of 17 Member States of the EU and five EU non-member countries.

Results: Most respondents supported GP involvement in the development of clinical recommendations relevant to general practice. Respondents emphasized that UEMO must turn to WONCA-Europe, the academic society of GPs, when scientific input is required. Among the ten priority topics for HTA in oncology, four emerged as most relevant for the GPs: 1. Conscientious prescription of interventions considering over- and under-medicalization, 2. establishing a system for continuity of care integrating palliative care, 3. ensuring evidence-based medicine, and 4. promoting collaborative care and considering workload.

Discussion and conclusions: The GP can contribute to the debate by defending these four priorities. Presenting the difficulties in this debate can contribute to a better understanding of the implementation of new technology in the real world.

全科医生在欧洲卫生技术评估中的作用,以欧盟- hta在肿瘤学中的创新为例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书