Can One Predict Persistence beyond Adolescence in Childhood Absence Epilepsy?

Acta neurologica Taiwanica Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-24 DOI:10.4103/ant.ANT-D-24-00032
Sirichai Chayasirisobhon, Suresh Gurbani, Noriko McCall, Pantea Zohrevand, Benjamin Spurgeon, Keira Chayasirisobhon, Jason Chau
{"title":"Can One Predict Persistence beyond Adolescence in Childhood Absence Epilepsy?","authors":"Sirichai Chayasirisobhon, Suresh Gurbani, Noriko McCall, Pantea Zohrevand, Benjamin Spurgeon, Keira Chayasirisobhon, Jason Chau","doi":"10.4103/ant.ANT-D-24-00032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although typical childhood absence epilepsy is common and drug-resistance is not uncommon, predictors of drug resistance and its persistence beyond adolescence have not been well studied.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To predict recalcitrant childhood absence epilepsy (CAE).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective data analysis of 153 CAE patients was done. Controlled CAE group (cCAE) had seizure control within 2 years of starting antiseizure medication regimen (ASM) and electroencephalographic (EEG) normalization at <16 years of age. The remaining cohort was classified as drug-resistant CAE group (rCAE). The factors which may affect outcome were analyzed. Seizure freedom was defined as 10 years of clinical seizure-free period with at least 5 years off ASM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 153 patients, 104 (67.97%) qualified for cCAE and 79 (75.96%) responded to the first ASM. All in cCAE also achieved seizure freedom. The comparison of initial EEG abnormalities to ASM efficacy proved divalproex sodium (VPA) superiority for patients with poly spike and wave discharges (PSW), Fisher's exact test, P = 0.021, but not ethosuximide (ESM), Fisher's exact test, P = 0.00058; both ASM were equally effective for single spike and wave discharges (SSW); and VPA equally effective for SSW and PSW. Of 49 patients in rCAE, 11 (22.45%) eventually achieved seizure freedom. None in cCAE but 17 (34.69%) in rCAE developed other seizure types which included 9 (18.37%) who developed juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of CAE patients attained seizure control over 2 years with EEG normalization before the age of 16 years, and all of them went on to achieve seizure freedom. Almost 3/4th of the patients who are likely to attain seizure control and achieve seizure freedom will do so with the first-line ASM. In addition, ESM should be the first ASM for patients with CAE with SSW, but VPA may be used as the first ASM for patients with CAE with PSW. Furthermore, seizure control and freedom are still possible in some patients with rCAE. Persistent PSW and later development of additional seizure type may predict refractory status and, in some patients, evolving JME.</p>","PeriodicalId":93852,"journal":{"name":"Acta neurologica Taiwanica","volume":"35 3","pages":"137-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta neurologica Taiwanica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ant.ANT-D-24-00032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although typical childhood absence epilepsy is common and drug-resistance is not uncommon, predictors of drug resistance and its persistence beyond adolescence have not been well studied.

Objectives: To predict recalcitrant childhood absence epilepsy (CAE).

Materials and methods: Retrospective data analysis of 153 CAE patients was done. Controlled CAE group (cCAE) had seizure control within 2 years of starting antiseizure medication regimen (ASM) and electroencephalographic (EEG) normalization at <16 years of age. The remaining cohort was classified as drug-resistant CAE group (rCAE). The factors which may affect outcome were analyzed. Seizure freedom was defined as 10 years of clinical seizure-free period with at least 5 years off ASM.

Results: Of 153 patients, 104 (67.97%) qualified for cCAE and 79 (75.96%) responded to the first ASM. All in cCAE also achieved seizure freedom. The comparison of initial EEG abnormalities to ASM efficacy proved divalproex sodium (VPA) superiority for patients with poly spike and wave discharges (PSW), Fisher's exact test, P = 0.021, but not ethosuximide (ESM), Fisher's exact test, P = 0.00058; both ASM were equally effective for single spike and wave discharges (SSW); and VPA equally effective for SSW and PSW. Of 49 patients in rCAE, 11 (22.45%) eventually achieved seizure freedom. None in cCAE but 17 (34.69%) in rCAE developed other seizure types which included 9 (18.37%) who developed juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME).

Conclusions: The majority of CAE patients attained seizure control over 2 years with EEG normalization before the age of 16 years, and all of them went on to achieve seizure freedom. Almost 3/4th of the patients who are likely to attain seizure control and achieve seizure freedom will do so with the first-line ASM. In addition, ESM should be the first ASM for patients with CAE with SSW, but VPA may be used as the first ASM for patients with CAE with PSW. Furthermore, seizure control and freedom are still possible in some patients with rCAE. Persistent PSW and later development of additional seizure type may predict refractory status and, in some patients, evolving JME.

能否预测儿童期癫痫缺失患者在青春期后的持续性?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书