{"title":"Point-of-Care Assessment of Kidney Function in Chronic Kidney Disease: Current Technologies and Future Perspectives.","authors":"Atthaphong Phongphithakchai, Kraiyasak Wongna, Ratana Netphakdee, Wiyada Kwanhian Klangbud, Jongkonnee Thanasai, Fumitaka Kawakami, Moragot Chatatikun","doi":"10.3390/medsci14050521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic kidney disease (CKD) requires assessment of both glomerular filtration and kidney damage, particularly albuminuria, for diagnosis, risk stratification, and longitudinal care. Point-of-care testing (POCT) can shorten turnaround time and improve access when conventional laboratory testing is unavailable or would delay a clinical pathway. This narrative review summarizes established and emerging POCT approaches for kidney assessment in CKD, with emphasis on creatinine/eGFR and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), and distinguishes analytical validity from workflow utility and patient-level clinical utility. Evidence is strongest for rapid creatinine measurement in selected workflows, especially pre-imaging assessment and decentralized screening, while quantitative/semiquantitative UACR POCT can support CKD detection when abnormal results are appropriately confirmed. Cystatin C microfluidic systems remain investigational, and kidney injury/stress or molecular biomarkers such as NGAL, KIM-1, L-FABP, [TIMP-2]·[IGFBP7], extracellular vesicles, and microRNAs should be regarded primarily as a research horizon rather than direct measures of GFR. Important implementation requirements include assay-specific validation, calibration traceability, quality assurance, recognition of biological and analytical interference, and confirmation of results near major clinical decision thresholds. Evidence that POCT improves long-term CKD outcomes, safety, adherence, or cost-effectiveness remains limited. Future studies should prioritize prospective clinical utility, implementation, cost-effectiveness, home-use validation, and patient-centered outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":74152,"journal":{"name":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"14 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13608918/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci14050521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) requires assessment of both glomerular filtration and kidney damage, particularly albuminuria, for diagnosis, risk stratification, and longitudinal care. Point-of-care testing (POCT) can shorten turnaround time and improve access when conventional laboratory testing is unavailable or would delay a clinical pathway. This narrative review summarizes established and emerging POCT approaches for kidney assessment in CKD, with emphasis on creatinine/eGFR and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), and distinguishes analytical validity from workflow utility and patient-level clinical utility. Evidence is strongest for rapid creatinine measurement in selected workflows, especially pre-imaging assessment and decentralized screening, while quantitative/semiquantitative UACR POCT can support CKD detection when abnormal results are appropriately confirmed. Cystatin C microfluidic systems remain investigational, and kidney injury/stress or molecular biomarkers such as NGAL, KIM-1, L-FABP, [TIMP-2]·[IGFBP7], extracellular vesicles, and microRNAs should be regarded primarily as a research horizon rather than direct measures of GFR. Important implementation requirements include assay-specific validation, calibration traceability, quality assurance, recognition of biological and analytical interference, and confirmation of results near major clinical decision thresholds. Evidence that POCT improves long-term CKD outcomes, safety, adherence, or cost-effectiveness remains limited. Future studies should prioritize prospective clinical utility, implementation, cost-effectiveness, home-use validation, and patient-centered outcomes.