Challenges of Effective Clinical Teaching Organization at Public Medical Universities in Poland: A Delphi Method Study.

IF 4.4 Q1 Medicine
Pawel Zawieja, Anna Lipert, Remigiusz Kozlowski
{"title":"Challenges of Effective Clinical Teaching Organization at Public Medical Universities in Poland: A Delphi Method Study.","authors":"Pawel Zawieja, Anna Lipert, Remigiusz Kozlowski","doi":"10.3390/medsci14050594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Clinical teaching as a form of interpersonal education organized in a real clinical setting is very dynamic and sensitive to many factors that may influence its effectiveness. To strengthen clinical education organization, responsible bodies should meet emerging challenges, which are best understood from the perspective of the direct recipients and providers of clinical teaching. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore and analyze the existing challenges of clinical teaching organization in public medical universities in Poland from students' and academics' perspectives. <b>Methods</b>: A modified two-round Delphi study was conducted in six Polish medical universities. Round 1 included 218 experts (131 students and 87 academics), while 124 experts completed Round 2 (attrition rate: 43.1%). Consensus was predefined as a median score ≥ 4.0 and IQR ≤ 1.0. <b>Results</b>: Items with the highest mean values (approximately 4.4 on a five-point Likert scale) indicated a clear perception of space shortages and demand for updated teaching methods. The exploratory correlation revealed two broad thematic patterns: (1) space and overcrowding; (2) teaching methods. <b>Conclusions</b>: The findings suggest that stakeholders perceive educational space, overcrowding and modernization of teaching methods as important areas for improvement in clinical teaching.</p>","PeriodicalId":74152,"journal":{"name":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"14 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13609455/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci14050594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Clinical teaching as a form of interpersonal education organized in a real clinical setting is very dynamic and sensitive to many factors that may influence its effectiveness. To strengthen clinical education organization, responsible bodies should meet emerging challenges, which are best understood from the perspective of the direct recipients and providers of clinical teaching. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore and analyze the existing challenges of clinical teaching organization in public medical universities in Poland from students' and academics' perspectives. Methods: A modified two-round Delphi study was conducted in six Polish medical universities. Round 1 included 218 experts (131 students and 87 academics), while 124 experts completed Round 2 (attrition rate: 43.1%). Consensus was predefined as a median score ≥ 4.0 and IQR ≤ 1.0. Results: Items with the highest mean values (approximately 4.4 on a five-point Likert scale) indicated a clear perception of space shortages and demand for updated teaching methods. The exploratory correlation revealed two broad thematic patterns: (1) space and overcrowding; (2) teaching methods. Conclusions: The findings suggest that stakeholders perceive educational space, overcrowding and modernization of teaching methods as important areas for improvement in clinical teaching.

波兰公立医科大学有效临床教学组织面临的挑战:德尔菲法研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书