Vitamin D and Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 4.4 Q1 Medicine
Roxana Pântea, Lorena Elena Meliț
{"title":"Vitamin D and Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Roxana Pântea, Lorena Elena Meliț","doi":"10.3390/medsci14050562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Gastric cancer is a major global health challenge with multifactorial aetiology. Vitamin D has been investigated for a potential role in gastric carcinogenesis, but evidence remains heterogeneous. This systematic review aimed to synthesise evidence on serum 25(OH)D, dietary vitamin D intake and VDR polymorphisms in relation to gastric cancer in adults and children. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic search following PRISMA 2020 standards was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Lens.org for studies published from January 2007 to January 2026. Observational studies evaluating vitamin D exposure or VDR polymorphisms in relation to gastric cancer were eligible. Risk of bias was assessed using established instruments. Where comparable data were available, random-effects meta-analyses were performed, with REML estimation and Knapp-Hartung adjustment. <b>Results:</b> Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria, and no eligible paediatric studies were identified. Four studies evaluating serum 25(OH)D showed a non-significant tendency towards lower concentrations in gastric cancer patients (MD = -8.82 ng/mL, 95% CI -18.15 to 0.51). Five studies evaluating dietary vitamin D showed no significant association with gastric cancer risk (OR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.47-1.60). Five studies evaluating the VDR FokI polymorphism under the dominant model demonstrated increased gastric cancer susceptibility among variant carriers (OR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.03-2.01). <b>Conclusions:</b> Associations between vitamin D and gastric cancer varied by exposure type. Serum 25(OH)D and dietary intake showed no significant pooled associations, whereas VDR FokI was associated with increased gastric cancer susceptibility. The absence of paediatric evidence highlights an important knowledge gap.</p>","PeriodicalId":74152,"journal":{"name":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"14 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13608993/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci14050562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Gastric cancer is a major global health challenge with multifactorial aetiology. Vitamin D has been investigated for a potential role in gastric carcinogenesis, but evidence remains heterogeneous. This systematic review aimed to synthesise evidence on serum 25(OH)D, dietary vitamin D intake and VDR polymorphisms in relation to gastric cancer in adults and children. Methods: A systematic search following PRISMA 2020 standards was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Lens.org for studies published from January 2007 to January 2026. Observational studies evaluating vitamin D exposure or VDR polymorphisms in relation to gastric cancer were eligible. Risk of bias was assessed using established instruments. Where comparable data were available, random-effects meta-analyses were performed, with REML estimation and Knapp-Hartung adjustment. Results: Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria, and no eligible paediatric studies were identified. Four studies evaluating serum 25(OH)D showed a non-significant tendency towards lower concentrations in gastric cancer patients (MD = -8.82 ng/mL, 95% CI -18.15 to 0.51). Five studies evaluating dietary vitamin D showed no significant association with gastric cancer risk (OR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.47-1.60). Five studies evaluating the VDR FokI polymorphism under the dominant model demonstrated increased gastric cancer susceptibility among variant carriers (OR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.03-2.01). Conclusions: Associations between vitamin D and gastric cancer varied by exposure type. Serum 25(OH)D and dietary intake showed no significant pooled associations, whereas VDR FokI was associated with increased gastric cancer susceptibility. The absence of paediatric evidence highlights an important knowledge gap.

维生素D与胃癌:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书