Implementing a digital audit-and-feedback surveillance system for diabetic ketoacidosis: study protocol for the DEKODE programme.

IF 2.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2026-09-09 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2026.1836949
Amanda Ling Jie Yee, Kalyaani Persad, Aspasia Manta, Amy Grove, Punith Kempegowda
{"title":"Implementing a digital audit-and-feedback surveillance system for diabetic ketoacidosis: study protocol for the DEKODE programme.","authors":"Amanda Ling Jie Yee, Kalyaani Persad, Aspasia Manta, Amy Grove, Punith Kempegowda","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2026.1836949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diabetic ketoacidosis is one of the leading causes of unplanned hospital admission among people with diabetes, yet adherence to treatment guidelines remains inconsistent, contributing to variation in care and suboptimal outcomes. Conventional audit approaches are limited by non-standardised data collection, restricting benchmarking and shared learning. The Digital Evaluation of Ketosis and Other Diabetic Emergencies (DEKODE) platform was developed as a cloud-based audit-and-feedback system to support near real-time performance monitoring and continuous quality improvement, but its implementation requires theory-informed evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multi-site, mixed-methods study involves six National Health Service hospitals, including early adopters and sites new to DEKODE. Guided by an implementation research logic model, the study links contextual determinants to tailored strategies. Quantitative outcomes, including episode duration, guideline adherence, complications, and clinical outcomes, will be analysed using interrupted time series methods. Qualitative stakeholder interviews will be analysed thematically, and findings integrated using triangulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study will assess the impact of DEKODE on clinical and process outcomes and identify determinants influencing adoption, fidelity, and sustainability.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings will inform scalable implementation of digital audit-and-feedback systems to reduce variation in acute diabetes care and improve patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN17096714, identifier ISRCTN17096714.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"6 ","pages":"1836949"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13597787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2026.1836949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetic ketoacidosis is one of the leading causes of unplanned hospital admission among people with diabetes, yet adherence to treatment guidelines remains inconsistent, contributing to variation in care and suboptimal outcomes. Conventional audit approaches are limited by non-standardised data collection, restricting benchmarking and shared learning. The Digital Evaluation of Ketosis and Other Diabetic Emergencies (DEKODE) platform was developed as a cloud-based audit-and-feedback system to support near real-time performance monitoring and continuous quality improvement, but its implementation requires theory-informed evaluation.

Methods: This multi-site, mixed-methods study involves six National Health Service hospitals, including early adopters and sites new to DEKODE. Guided by an implementation research logic model, the study links contextual determinants to tailored strategies. Quantitative outcomes, including episode duration, guideline adherence, complications, and clinical outcomes, will be analysed using interrupted time series methods. Qualitative stakeholder interviews will be analysed thematically, and findings integrated using triangulation.

Results: The study will assess the impact of DEKODE on clinical and process outcomes and identify determinants influencing adoption, fidelity, and sustainability.

Discussion: Findings will inform scalable implementation of digital audit-and-feedback systems to reduce variation in acute diabetes care and improve patient outcomes.

Clinical trial registration: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN17096714, identifier ISRCTN17096714.

实施糖尿病酮症酸中毒的数字审计和反馈监测系统:DEKODE项目的研究方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书