The Association Between Pre-injury Occupation Type and Post-burn Employment Outcomes.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
K L Chacon, C A Westerman, L J Shepler, K A McMullen, N Mistry, G J Carrougher, N S Gibran, B T Stewart, K Kowalske, C M Ryan, J C Schneider
{"title":"The Association Between Pre-injury Occupation Type and Post-burn Employment Outcomes.","authors":"K L Chacon, C A Westerman, L J Shepler, K A McMullen, N Mistry, G J Carrougher, N S Gibran, B T Stewart, K Kowalske, C M Ryan, J C Schneider","doi":"10.1007/s10926-026-10455-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the relationship between burn survivors' pre-injury occupation and the likelihood of successful return to employment in the post-rehab setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants in the Burn Model Systems database were designated as Labor or Non-labor employees based on their self-reported occupation pre-injury. The groups were compared across a variety of demographic and clinical variables using descriptive statistics. Logistic regression models were used to examine employment status at 12 months, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to examine time to return to work. Sankey diagrams examined patterns in career change between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Burn survivors working in Labor occupations prior to injury differed from Non-labor counterparts across several sociodemographic and injury-related characteristics, including lower education levels, higher rates of employment-related injuries, and different insurance coverage patterns. In the a priori logistic regression model, Labor Group status was associated with lower odds of employment at 12 months (OR=0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.90, p=0.024). However, this association was no longer statistically significant in a post hoc sensitivity analysis additionally adjusting for education and insurance status (OR=0.47, 95% CI 0.20-1.08, p=0.076). In the Cox proportional hazards model, participants in Labor occupations experienced a significantly slower return to work than those in Non-labor occupations (HR=0.51, 95% CI 0.31-0.82, p=0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings underscore the importance of providing tailored support to burn survivors seeking to resume employment and demonstrate that the relationship between pre-injury occupation and workforce reintegration may differ depending on the employment outcome examined. While the association between Labor Group status and employment at 12 months was attenuated after accounting for education and insurance, Labor Group status remained significantly associated with a slower return to work. Pre-injury occupation, together with socioeconomic and structural factors, may therefore be important to consider when developing initiatives to support workforce reintegration following burn injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":48035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-026-10455-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the relationship between burn survivors' pre-injury occupation and the likelihood of successful return to employment in the post-rehab setting.

Methods: Participants in the Burn Model Systems database were designated as Labor or Non-labor employees based on their self-reported occupation pre-injury. The groups were compared across a variety of demographic and clinical variables using descriptive statistics. Logistic regression models were used to examine employment status at 12 months, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to examine time to return to work. Sankey diagrams examined patterns in career change between the two groups.

Results: Burn survivors working in Labor occupations prior to injury differed from Non-labor counterparts across several sociodemographic and injury-related characteristics, including lower education levels, higher rates of employment-related injuries, and different insurance coverage patterns. In the a priori logistic regression model, Labor Group status was associated with lower odds of employment at 12 months (OR=0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.90, p=0.024). However, this association was no longer statistically significant in a post hoc sensitivity analysis additionally adjusting for education and insurance status (OR=0.47, 95% CI 0.20-1.08, p=0.076). In the Cox proportional hazards model, participants in Labor occupations experienced a significantly slower return to work than those in Non-labor occupations (HR=0.51, 95% CI 0.31-0.82, p=0.005).

Conclusion: These findings underscore the importance of providing tailored support to burn survivors seeking to resume employment and demonstrate that the relationship between pre-injury occupation and workforce reintegration may differ depending on the employment outcome examined. While the association between Labor Group status and employment at 12 months was attenuated after accounting for education and insurance, Labor Group status remained significantly associated with a slower return to work. Pre-injury occupation, together with socioeconomic and structural factors, may therefore be important to consider when developing initiatives to support workforce reintegration following burn injury.

损伤前职业类型与烧伤后就业结果的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on the rehabilitation, reintegration, and prevention of disability in workers. The journal offers investigations involving original data collection and research synthesis (i.e., scoping reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses). Papers derive from a broad array of fields including rehabilitation medicine, physical and occupational therapy, health psychology and psychiatry, orthopedics, oncology, occupational and insurance medicine, neurology, social work, ergonomics, biomedical engineering, health economics, rehabilitation engineering, business administration and management, and law.  A single interdisciplinary source for information on work disability rehabilitation, the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation helps to advance the scientific understanding, management, and prevention of work disability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书