Steven Lillis, Lara Oertly, Belinda Wheaton, Byron Rangiwai, Nicholas Bowden, Stephanie D'Souza
{"title":"Beyond prescribing rights: designing equitable and sustainable attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder care pathways in Aotearoa New Zealand.","authors":"Steven Lillis, Lara Oertly, Belinda Wheaton, Byron Rangiwai, Nicholas Bowden, Stephanie D'Souza","doi":"10.26635/6965.7381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>From February 2026, vocationally trained general practitioners and nurse practitioners in Aotearoa New Zealand are authorised to initiate stimulant medication for adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), marking a shift from a predominantly secondary care model. This viewpoint article examines the clinical, ethical and service-level implications of this regulatory change, with particular attention to equity, diagnostic quality, cost and sustainability in primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This viewpoint draws on Aotearoa New Zealand policy documents, international clinical guidance and selected peer-reviewed literature to inform a policy and equity-focussed analysis of expanded stimulant prescribing authority.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The policy change has the potential to improve access to ADHD treatment; however, the absence of mandated training, competency standards or operational guidance raises concerns about diagnostic quality, management of comorbidity and prescribing safety. The time-intensive nature of adult ADHD assessment presents workload and resourcing challenges for primary care, and multiple service delivery models are likely to emerge with variable equity implications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Expanded prescribing authority may improve access, but without appropriate training, resourcing and implementation frameworks, benefits may be unevenly realised. Clear standards and equity-centred service design are essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":48086,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"139 1642","pages":"156-161"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.7381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: From February 2026, vocationally trained general practitioners and nurse practitioners in Aotearoa New Zealand are authorised to initiate stimulant medication for adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), marking a shift from a predominantly secondary care model. This viewpoint article examines the clinical, ethical and service-level implications of this regulatory change, with particular attention to equity, diagnostic quality, cost and sustainability in primary care.
Methods: This viewpoint draws on Aotearoa New Zealand policy documents, international clinical guidance and selected peer-reviewed literature to inform a policy and equity-focussed analysis of expanded stimulant prescribing authority.
Results: The policy change has the potential to improve access to ADHD treatment; however, the absence of mandated training, competency standards or operational guidance raises concerns about diagnostic quality, management of comorbidity and prescribing safety. The time-intensive nature of adult ADHD assessment presents workload and resourcing challenges for primary care, and multiple service delivery models are likely to emerge with variable equity implications.
Conclusion: Expanded prescribing authority may improve access, but without appropriate training, resourcing and implementation frameworks, benefits may be unevenly realised. Clear standards and equity-centred service design are essential.