Prospective Intraindividual Comparison of Ga-68 PSMA and F-18 FDG Dual-Tracer PET/CT Imaging in Evaluation of High-Grade Prostate Cancer.

IF 1 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
World Journal of Nuclear Medicine Pub Date : 2026-07-15 eCollection Date: 2026-09-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0046-1825755
Harini Koorma, Mohan Roop Jayanthi, Suneetha Batchu, Anuradha Sekaran, Rajesh Kumar Reddy, Mallikarjuna Chiruvella
{"title":"Prospective Intraindividual Comparison of Ga-68 PSMA and F-18 FDG Dual-Tracer PET/CT Imaging in Evaluation of High-Grade Prostate Cancer.","authors":"Harini Koorma, Mohan Roop Jayanthi, Suneetha Batchu, Anuradha Sekaran, Rajesh Kumar Reddy, Mallikarjuna Chiruvella","doi":"10.1055/s-0046-1825755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>High-grade prostate cancer (International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] grade groups 4 and 5) is often aggressive and associated with early metastatic spread. Gallium-68 (Ga-68) prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is widely adopted for prostate cancer imaging due to its high sensitivity, while F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT may provide complementary metabolic information. This study investigates and compares the diagnostic performance of these two modalities and evaluates the incremental value of dual-tracer PET/CT imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study included 51 patients with biopsy-proven, high-grade prostate adenocarcinoma (ISUP grade groups 4 and 5) undergoing both Ga-68 PSMA and F-18 FDG PET/CT within 1 week. Detection rates for primary tumors, nodal, and distant metastases were analyzed. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax), lesion-to-aorta and lesion-to-muscle ratios, and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were correlated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT demonstrated superior detection rate for primary tumor detection (90.2%) compared to F-18 FDG PET/CT (66.7%, <i>p</i>  = 0.004). For pelvic lymph nodes, detection rates were numerically higher with PSMA PET/CT (76.2% vs. 59.5% for FDG PET/CT), although this difference did not reach statistical significance; for extrapelvic lymph nodes, 95.2% (PSMA) versus 52.4% (FDG, <i>p</i>  = 0.02); and for bone lesions, 100% (PSMA) versus 77.8% (FDG, <i>p</i>  = 0.009). In ISUP grade 4, primary detection was 94.4% (PSMA) versus 50% (FDG, <i>p</i>  = 0.003); in grade 5, 87.9% (PSMA) versus 75.8% (FDG). Dual-tracer imaging improved overall detection of primary tumors and pelvic lymph nodes to 100 and 90.4%, respectively. A mild correlation was observed between PSA levels and PSMA SUVmax ( <i>r</i>  = 0.297, <i>p</i>  = 0.034). Strong positive correlations were found between SUVmax and both lesion-to-aorta and lesion-to-muscle ratios for both tracers. Interreader agreement was excellent for PSMA ( <i>κ</i>  = 1.00) and high for FDG ( <i>κ</i>  = 0.95).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT demonstrated high detection rates for detecting primary and metastatic lesions in high-grade prostate cancer. F-18 FDG PET/CT offers complementary metabolic information, particularly valuable in ISUP grade 5 and dedifferentiated tumors. Dual-tracer PET/CT enhances diagnostic accuracy and may facilitate personalized treatment strategies in aggressive prostate cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":23742,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"25 3","pages":"232-241"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13612111/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0046-1825755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: High-grade prostate cancer (International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] grade groups 4 and 5) is often aggressive and associated with early metastatic spread. Gallium-68 (Ga-68) prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is widely adopted for prostate cancer imaging due to its high sensitivity, while F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT may provide complementary metabolic information. This study investigates and compares the diagnostic performance of these two modalities and evaluates the incremental value of dual-tracer PET/CT imaging.

Methods: This prospective observational study included 51 patients with biopsy-proven, high-grade prostate adenocarcinoma (ISUP grade groups 4 and 5) undergoing both Ga-68 PSMA and F-18 FDG PET/CT within 1 week. Detection rates for primary tumors, nodal, and distant metastases were analyzed. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax), lesion-to-aorta and lesion-to-muscle ratios, and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were correlated.

Results: Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT demonstrated superior detection rate for primary tumor detection (90.2%) compared to F-18 FDG PET/CT (66.7%, p  = 0.004). For pelvic lymph nodes, detection rates were numerically higher with PSMA PET/CT (76.2% vs. 59.5% for FDG PET/CT), although this difference did not reach statistical significance; for extrapelvic lymph nodes, 95.2% (PSMA) versus 52.4% (FDG, p  = 0.02); and for bone lesions, 100% (PSMA) versus 77.8% (FDG, p  = 0.009). In ISUP grade 4, primary detection was 94.4% (PSMA) versus 50% (FDG, p  = 0.003); in grade 5, 87.9% (PSMA) versus 75.8% (FDG). Dual-tracer imaging improved overall detection of primary tumors and pelvic lymph nodes to 100 and 90.4%, respectively. A mild correlation was observed between PSA levels and PSMA SUVmax ( r  = 0.297, p  = 0.034). Strong positive correlations were found between SUVmax and both lesion-to-aorta and lesion-to-muscle ratios for both tracers. Interreader agreement was excellent for PSMA ( κ  = 1.00) and high for FDG ( κ  = 0.95).

Conclusion: Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT demonstrated high detection rates for detecting primary and metastatic lesions in high-grade prostate cancer. F-18 FDG PET/CT offers complementary metabolic information, particularly valuable in ISUP grade 5 and dedifferentiated tumors. Dual-tracer PET/CT enhances diagnostic accuracy and may facilitate personalized treatment strategies in aggressive prostate cancer.

Ga-68 PSMA和F-18 FDG双示踪PET/CT评价高级别前列腺癌的前瞻性个体比较
导读:高级别前列腺癌(国际泌尿病理学会[ISUP]分级4组和5组)通常具有侵袭性,并伴有早期转移性扩散。镓-68 (Ga-68)前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)因其高灵敏度被广泛用于前列腺癌成像,而F-18氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG) PET/CT可能提供互补的代谢信息。本研究调查并比较了这两种方式的诊断性能,并评估了双示踪PET/CT成像的增量价值。方法:这项前瞻性观察研究纳入了51例活检证实的高级别前列腺癌(ISUP分级4组和5组)患者,在1周内接受了Ga-68 PSMA和F-18 FDG PET/CT检查。分析原发肿瘤、淋巴结和远处转移的检出率。最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)、病变与主动脉和病变与肌肉的比值以及血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平相关。结果:Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT对原发肿瘤的检出率(90.2%)优于F-18 FDG PET/CT (66.7%, p = 0.004)。对于盆腔淋巴结,PSMA PET/CT的检出率更高(76.2% vs. FDG PET/CT的59.5%),尽管这种差异没有达到统计学意义;盆腔外淋巴结,95.2% (PSMA) vs 52.4% (FDG, p = 0.02);对于骨骼病变,100% (PSMA)对77.8% (FDG, p = 0.009)。在ISUP 4级患者中,原发性检出率为94.4% (PSMA)对50% (FDG, p = 0.003);5级为87.9% (PSMA)和75.8% (FDG)。双示踪成像将原发性肿瘤和盆腔淋巴结的总体检出率分别提高到100%和90.4%。PSA水平与PSMA SUVmax之间存在轻度相关性(r = 0.297, p = 0.034)。两种示踪剂的SUVmax与病变与主动脉和病变与肌肉的比值呈正相关。PSMA的解读器一致性很好(κ = 1.00), FDG的解读器一致性很高(κ = 0.95)。结论:Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT对高级别前列腺癌的原发和转移病变具有较高的检出率。F-18 FDG PET/CT提供了补充的代谢信息,在ISUP 5级和去分化肿瘤中尤其有价值。双示踪PET/CT提高了诊断准确性,并可能促进侵袭性前列腺癌的个性化治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Nuclear Medicine
World Journal of Nuclear Medicine RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
自引率
16.70%
发文量
118
审稿时长
48 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书