Iatrogenic Brachial Plexus Injuries Evaluated in an Electrodiagnostic Lab.

IF 3.3 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Lisa B E Shields, Vasudeva G Iyer, Smita Ghare, Christopher B Shields
{"title":"Iatrogenic Brachial Plexus Injuries Evaluated in an Electrodiagnostic Lab.","authors":"Lisa B E Shields, Vasudeva G Iyer, Smita Ghare, Christopher B Shields","doi":"10.3390/neurolint18090166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Iatrogenic brachial plexus injuries (BPI) are known to occur following a host of surgeries, most often during procedures at the shoulder and cardiac procedures with a median sternotomy. The primary mechanisms include overstretching of the brachial plexus, direct trauma, or compression by hematoma or seroma. Our objective was to determine the pattern of iatrogenic BPI in patients referred to us for electrodiagnostic (EDX) evaluation. <b>Methods:</b> This is a review of 52 patients who were referred to our Neurodiagnostic Center for an iatrogenic BPI over a 16-year (9 July 2010-17 June 2026) period. All patients underwent a clinical examination and EDX studies. <b>Results:</b> The most frequent etiologies of the iatrogenic BPI were shoulder surgery in 28 [53.8%] patients and coronary artery bypass graft procedures with a median sternotomy in 13 [25.0%] patients. The topography of brachial plexus involvement was trunks in 22 (42.3%) and cords in 12 (23.1%). Ten (19.2%) patients had a pan-plexopathy, and the remaining eight (15.4%) patients had multiple sites involving the trunks, cords, and branches. The majority (48 [92.3%]) of patients sustained a stretch injury of the brachial plexus, and four (7.7%) sustained a direct injury. A total of 48 (92.3%) patients had reduced motor unit potential recruitment and/or increased polyphasic motor units on needle EMG, and a similar number had an absence of or low amplitude sensory nerve action potentials. <b>Conclusions:</b> Surgeons should take appropriate precautions to avoid BPI during many surgical procedures especially those of the shoulder and cardiac procedures with a median sternotomy. EDX studies are valuable in detecting and localizing an iatrogenic BPI as well as assessing reinnervation. Preoperative positioning limiting excessive shoulder abduction as well as intraoperative neuromonitoring are measures that may reduce the likelihood of an iatrogenic BPI.</p>","PeriodicalId":19130,"journal":{"name":"Neurology International","volume":"18 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13609988/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint18090166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Iatrogenic brachial plexus injuries (BPI) are known to occur following a host of surgeries, most often during procedures at the shoulder and cardiac procedures with a median sternotomy. The primary mechanisms include overstretching of the brachial plexus, direct trauma, or compression by hematoma or seroma. Our objective was to determine the pattern of iatrogenic BPI in patients referred to us for electrodiagnostic (EDX) evaluation. Methods: This is a review of 52 patients who were referred to our Neurodiagnostic Center for an iatrogenic BPI over a 16-year (9 July 2010-17 June 2026) period. All patients underwent a clinical examination and EDX studies. Results: The most frequent etiologies of the iatrogenic BPI were shoulder surgery in 28 [53.8%] patients and coronary artery bypass graft procedures with a median sternotomy in 13 [25.0%] patients. The topography of brachial plexus involvement was trunks in 22 (42.3%) and cords in 12 (23.1%). Ten (19.2%) patients had a pan-plexopathy, and the remaining eight (15.4%) patients had multiple sites involving the trunks, cords, and branches. The majority (48 [92.3%]) of patients sustained a stretch injury of the brachial plexus, and four (7.7%) sustained a direct injury. A total of 48 (92.3%) patients had reduced motor unit potential recruitment and/or increased polyphasic motor units on needle EMG, and a similar number had an absence of or low amplitude sensory nerve action potentials. Conclusions: Surgeons should take appropriate precautions to avoid BPI during many surgical procedures especially those of the shoulder and cardiac procedures with a median sternotomy. EDX studies are valuable in detecting and localizing an iatrogenic BPI as well as assessing reinnervation. Preoperative positioning limiting excessive shoulder abduction as well as intraoperative neuromonitoring are measures that may reduce the likelihood of an iatrogenic BPI.

电诊断实验室评估医源性臂丛神经损伤。
背景/目的:已知医源性臂丛神经损伤(BPI)发生在许多手术之后,最常发生在肩部手术和胸骨正中切口的心脏手术中。主要机制包括臂丛过度伸展、直接创伤或血肿或血肿压迫。我们的目的是确定医源性BPI的模式患者转介我们进行电诊断(EDX)评估。方法:本研究回顾了16年(2010年7月9日- 2026年6月17日)期间因医源性BPI而转介至我们神经诊断中心的52例患者。所有患者均进行了临床检查和EDX研究。结果:医源性BPI最常见的病因是肩部手术(28例[53.8%])和冠状动脉搭桥术合并胸骨正中切开(13例[25.0%])。臂丛受累的形态为干状22例(42.3%),索状12例(23.1%)。10例(19.2%)患者有泛神经丛病变,其余8例(15.4%)患者有累及干、索和分支的多部位病变。臂丛牵张损伤48例(92.3%),直接损伤4例(7.7%)。共有48例(92.3%)患者在针肌电图上表现为运动单元电位募集减少和/或多相运动单元增加,同样数量的患者表现为感觉神经动作电位缺失或低振幅。结论:外科医生在许多外科手术中应采取适当的预防措施以避免BPI,特别是肩关节和胸骨正中切口的心脏手术。EDX研究在检测和定位医源性BPI以及评估神经再生方面具有重要价值。术前定位限制肩部过度外展以及术中神经监测是可以降低医源性BPI可能性的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology International
Neurology International CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书