Neurocognitive and Neuropsychiatric Trajectories in a Post-COVID Cohort: A Descriptive Longitudinal Study.

IF 3.3 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Giulia Del Duca, Marta Camici, Isabella Sperduti, Anna Clelia Brita, Martina Maresca, Carmela Pinnetti, Ilaria Mastrorosa, Valentina Mazzotta, Andrea Antinori
{"title":"Neurocognitive and Neuropsychiatric Trajectories in a Post-COVID Cohort: A Descriptive Longitudinal Study.","authors":"Giulia Del Duca, Marta Camici, Isabella Sperduti, Anna Clelia Brita, Martina Maresca, Carmela Pinnetti, Ilaria Mastrorosa, Valentina Mazzotta, Andrea Antinori","doi":"10.3390/neurolint18090163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cognitive dysfunction (\"brain fog\") is a common manifestation of post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS) and may persist long after the acute infection. While cross-sectional studies have described cognitive deficits, longitudinal evidence on recovery trajectories remains limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a longitudinal observational study of neurocognitive performance and neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with PACS. Participants underwent assessment with 20 standardized tests covering five cognitive domains (memory, attention, language, executive functions, psychomotor processing speed); anxiety, depression, and sleep quality were assessed at three time points. Changes were analysed using the Friedman test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two patients were included (median age 57 years; 35.7% female) from a predominantly hospitalized cohort (81% hospitalised; 66.7% requiring respiratory support). Patients who completed all three assessments (completers, n = 42) were compared with those who attended the first evaluation but did not complete follow-up (non-completers, n = 544); completers were more severely ill during the acute phase rather than healthier or more motivated. At the group level, statistically significant improvements over time were observed across the whole sample in verbal short-term learning, visuospatial memory, working memory, constructional praxis, phonological verbal fluency, and psychomotor processing speed (all <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05); after Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment across the twenty cognitive outcomes, visuospatial span forward and backward and psychomotor processing speed remained significant (all FDR-adjusted <i>p</i> ≤ 0.013), with the change confined to the first six months. Sleep quality also improved (<i>p</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this cohort, group-level performance improved in six of the twenty tests administered, of which three remained significant after correction for multiple comparisons, while 28 of 42 patients (66.7%) still scored in the impaired range on at least one test at 12 months, and 17 (40.5%) on two or more. These findings highlight the importance of long-term neuropsychological monitoring and integrated cognitive-psychiatric evaluation in post-COVID care. Given the small, predominantly hospitalized sample, improvements should be interpreted cautiously and confirmed in larger controlled studies, although the use of alternate forms for part of the battery makes task-specific learning an incomplete explanation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19130,"journal":{"name":"Neurology International","volume":"18 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13610980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint18090163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cognitive dysfunction ("brain fog") is a common manifestation of post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS) and may persist long after the acute infection. While cross-sectional studies have described cognitive deficits, longitudinal evidence on recovery trajectories remains limited.

Methods: We conducted a longitudinal observational study of neurocognitive performance and neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with PACS. Participants underwent assessment with 20 standardized tests covering five cognitive domains (memory, attention, language, executive functions, psychomotor processing speed); anxiety, depression, and sleep quality were assessed at three time points. Changes were analysed using the Friedman test.

Results: Forty-two patients were included (median age 57 years; 35.7% female) from a predominantly hospitalized cohort (81% hospitalised; 66.7% requiring respiratory support). Patients who completed all three assessments (completers, n = 42) were compared with those who attended the first evaluation but did not complete follow-up (non-completers, n = 544); completers were more severely ill during the acute phase rather than healthier or more motivated. At the group level, statistically significant improvements over time were observed across the whole sample in verbal short-term learning, visuospatial memory, working memory, constructional praxis, phonological verbal fluency, and psychomotor processing speed (all p ≤ 0.05); after Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment across the twenty cognitive outcomes, visuospatial span forward and backward and psychomotor processing speed remained significant (all FDR-adjusted p ≤ 0.013), with the change confined to the first six months. Sleep quality also improved (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: In this cohort, group-level performance improved in six of the twenty tests administered, of which three remained significant after correction for multiple comparisons, while 28 of 42 patients (66.7%) still scored in the impaired range on at least one test at 12 months, and 17 (40.5%) on two or more. These findings highlight the importance of long-term neuropsychological monitoring and integrated cognitive-psychiatric evaluation in post-COVID care. Given the small, predominantly hospitalized sample, improvements should be interpreted cautiously and confirmed in larger controlled studies, although the use of alternate forms for part of the battery makes task-specific learning an incomplete explanation.

covid后队列中的神经认知和神经精神轨迹:一项描述性纵向研究
认知功能障碍(“脑雾”)是急性后COVID-19综合征(PACS)的常见表现,并可能在急性感染后持续很长时间。虽然横断面研究描述了认知缺陷,但关于恢复轨迹的纵向证据仍然有限。方法:我们对PACS患者的神经认知表现和神经精神症状进行了纵向观察研究。参与者接受了涵盖五个认知领域(记忆、注意力、语言、执行功能、精神运动处理速度)的20项标准化测试;在三个时间点评估焦虑、抑郁和睡眠质量。使用弗里德曼检验分析变化。结果:纳入42例患者(中位年龄57岁,35.7%为女性),主要来自住院队列(81%住院,66.7%需要呼吸支持)。完成所有三项评估的患者(完成者,n = 42)与参加第一次评估但未完成随访的患者(未完成者,n = 544)进行比较;在急性期,完成者的病情更严重,而不是更健康或更有动力。在组水平上,随着时间的推移,整个样本在语言短期学习、视觉空间记忆、工作记忆、结构实践、语音语言流畅性和精神运动加工速度方面的改善具有统计学意义(p≤0.05);经Benjamini-Hochberg调整后,20个认知结果的前向后视觉空间跨度和精神运动加工速度仍然显著(均经fdr调整p≤0.013),且变化仅限于前6个月。睡眠质量也有所改善(p < 0.0001)。结论:在本队列中,在进行的20项测试中,有6项组水平的表现得到改善,其中3项在多次比较校正后仍然显著,而42名患者中有28名(66.7%)在12个月时至少在一项测试中得分在受损范围内,17名(40.5%)在两次或两次以上测试中得分在受损范围内。这些发现强调了长期神经心理监测和综合认知-精神病学评估在covid后护理中的重要性。考虑到小的,主要是住院的样本,改进应该谨慎地解释,并在更大的对照研究中得到证实,尽管使用替代形式的部分电池使得特定任务的学习是不完整的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology International
Neurology International CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书