D Campagna, F Cucuzza, C Russo, J A Putra, P Caponnetto, G R M La Rosa, U Prosperini, S Agrawal, R Polosa
{"title":"Smoking cessation in emergency departments: a reality check.","authors":"D Campagna, F Cucuzza, C Russo, J A Putra, P Caponnetto, G R M La Rosa, U Prosperini, S Agrawal, R Polosa","doi":"10.1007/s11739-026-04528-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Emergency Departments (EDs) see a high prevalence of people who smoke, many of whom present with acute smoking-related conditions (e.g., myocardial infarction, stroke, pneumonia, and asthma/COPD exacerbations). The immediacy of illness creates a strong \"teachable moment,\" increasing receptiveness to risk communication and behavior change. Evidence indicates that pairing brief counseling with point-of-care therapeutic support and structured follow-up improves abstinence, although effects vary with local infrastructure, product availability, and staffing models. Despite this promise, scale-up is often constrained by economic barriers, limited staffing and training, and weak integration of cessation workflows into routine ED practice. The aim of this article is to provide a reality check on ED-based smoking cessation by synthesizing evidence on effectiveness, feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and safety across health-system contexts, and by outlining pragmatic delivery models and research priorities. Embedding low-friction, clinically governed cessation bundles within EDs has the potential to convert acute presentations into durable quit attempts and reduce smoking-related harm at scale, though this population-level impact remains a hypothesis to be tested. Future work should prioritize pragmatic and implementation trials with biochemically verified outcomes, integration metrics, equity impacts, and cost-utility analyses to guide sustainable adoption across diverse settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-026-04528-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Emergency Departments (EDs) see a high prevalence of people who smoke, many of whom present with acute smoking-related conditions (e.g., myocardial infarction, stroke, pneumonia, and asthma/COPD exacerbations). The immediacy of illness creates a strong "teachable moment," increasing receptiveness to risk communication and behavior change. Evidence indicates that pairing brief counseling with point-of-care therapeutic support and structured follow-up improves abstinence, although effects vary with local infrastructure, product availability, and staffing models. Despite this promise, scale-up is often constrained by economic barriers, limited staffing and training, and weak integration of cessation workflows into routine ED practice. The aim of this article is to provide a reality check on ED-based smoking cessation by synthesizing evidence on effectiveness, feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and safety across health-system contexts, and by outlining pragmatic delivery models and research priorities. Embedding low-friction, clinically governed cessation bundles within EDs has the potential to convert acute presentations into durable quit attempts and reduce smoking-related harm at scale, though this population-level impact remains a hypothesis to be tested. Future work should prioritize pragmatic and implementation trials with biochemically verified outcomes, integration metrics, equity impacts, and cost-utility analyses to guide sustainable adoption across diverse settings.
期刊介绍:
Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.