Driving mechanisms of understory herbaceous biomass and forest-grass restoration strategies in riparian silvopastoral systems of arid regions

IF 3.2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Hao Guo, Chang Liang, Yunmei Cai, ShengTianzi Dong, Yongyu Chen, Zhifang Xue, Suhua Wang, Tiantian Qin, Hegan Dong, Hanyue Wang
{"title":"Driving mechanisms of understory herbaceous biomass and forest-grass restoration strategies in riparian silvopastoral systems of arid regions","authors":"Hao Guo,&nbsp;Chang Liang,&nbsp;Yunmei Cai,&nbsp;ShengTianzi Dong,&nbsp;Yongyu Chen,&nbsp;Zhifang Xue,&nbsp;Suhua Wang,&nbsp;Tiantian Qin,&nbsp;Hegan Dong,&nbsp;Hanyue Wang","doi":"10.1007/s10457-026-01624-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Riparian forests in arid regions interact with human activities, resulting in unique silvopastoral systems. However, high-intensity grazing and environmental pressures have accelerated their degradation, posing threats to both pastoral livelihoods and ecological security. This study is based on field surveys conducted on 207 silvopastoral plots in arid hinterlands from 2022 to 2024. It employs explainable machine learning and causal inference to analyze the drivers of understory herbaceous biomass in both single-species (Sin-sil) and mixed-species (Mix-sil) riparian silvopastoral systems. The optimal model revealed that environmental conditions exert dominant influences on both systems (Sin-sil system: 42.077%; Mix-sil system: 60.251%), followed by stand structure (35.519%; 29.440%) and understory herbs (22.404%; 10.309%). Causal analysis further elucidates the mechanisms behind herbaceous biomass variation: the Sin-sil system exhibits relatively superior environmental conditions with competitive relationships between trees and herbaceous plants, while the Mix-sil system demonstrates poorer environmental conditions with mutual feedback between understory herbaceous vegetation and the local climate. Subsequently, a multi-objective optimization model was employed to synergistically enhance both herbaceous and tree biomass. The results demonstrate significant differences in restoration potential among various watersheds and types of silvopastoral systems. For the Sin-sil system, collaborative restoration strategies primarily include measures such as increasing herbaceous height, enhancing herbaceous density, and raising the proportion of <i>Bassia scoparia</i>. For the Mix-sil system, efforts should focus on improving the density of herbs. These findings indicate that implementing intensive management practices in silvopastoral systems is an effective strategy for promoting the synergistic restoration of forest and grass in arid regions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":"100 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-026-01624-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Riparian forests in arid regions interact with human activities, resulting in unique silvopastoral systems. However, high-intensity grazing and environmental pressures have accelerated their degradation, posing threats to both pastoral livelihoods and ecological security. This study is based on field surveys conducted on 207 silvopastoral plots in arid hinterlands from 2022 to 2024. It employs explainable machine learning and causal inference to analyze the drivers of understory herbaceous biomass in both single-species (Sin-sil) and mixed-species (Mix-sil) riparian silvopastoral systems. The optimal model revealed that environmental conditions exert dominant influences on both systems (Sin-sil system: 42.077%; Mix-sil system: 60.251%), followed by stand structure (35.519%; 29.440%) and understory herbs (22.404%; 10.309%). Causal analysis further elucidates the mechanisms behind herbaceous biomass variation: the Sin-sil system exhibits relatively superior environmental conditions with competitive relationships between trees and herbaceous plants, while the Mix-sil system demonstrates poorer environmental conditions with mutual feedback between understory herbaceous vegetation and the local climate. Subsequently, a multi-objective optimization model was employed to synergistically enhance both herbaceous and tree biomass. The results demonstrate significant differences in restoration potential among various watersheds and types of silvopastoral systems. For the Sin-sil system, collaborative restoration strategies primarily include measures such as increasing herbaceous height, enhancing herbaceous density, and raising the proportion of Bassia scoparia. For the Mix-sil system, efforts should focus on improving the density of herbs. These findings indicate that implementing intensive management practices in silvopastoral systems is an effective strategy for promoting the synergistic restoration of forest and grass in arid regions.

干旱区滨岸林草系统林下草本生物量驱动机制及林草恢复策略
干旱地区的河岸森林与人类活动相互作用,形成独特的森林栖息系统。然而,高强度放牧和环境压力加速了它们的退化,对牧民生计和生态安全构成威胁。本研究基于2022 - 2024年对干旱区腹地207个样地的野外调查。它采用可解释的机器学习和因果推理来分析单物种(Sin-sil)和混合物种(Mix-sil)河岸银栖系统中林下草本生物量的驱动因素。最优模型显示,环境条件对两种体系的影响均占主导地位(新-实体系占42.077%,混合-实体系占60.251%),其次是林分结构(35.519%,29.440%)和林下草本植物(22.404%,10.309%)。因果分析进一步阐明了草本生物量变化背后的机制:Sin-sil系统表现出相对优越的环境条件,树木与草本植物之间存在竞争关系,而Mix-sil系统表现出较差的环境条件,林下草本植被与当地气候之间存在相互反馈。随后,采用多目标优化模型协同提高草本和乔木生物量。结果表明,不同流域和类型的森林生态系统在恢复潜力上存在显著差异。对于sini -sil系统,协同恢复策略主要包括增加草本植物高度、增加草本植物密度、提高猪头蒿比例等措施。对于Mix-sil系统,应该努力提高草药的密度。这些结果表明,实施集约化管理是促进干旱区林草协同恢复的有效策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书