Using Measurement-Based Care to Inform Antidepressant Medication Management Among Veterans: A Pilot Study.

IF 3.2
Lauren R DiPaolo, Kevin G Lynch, Erin Niedererr, Ryan M Bremseth-Vining, Kevin Kennedy, David W Oslin
{"title":"Using Measurement-Based Care to Inform Antidepressant Medication Management Among Veterans: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Lauren R DiPaolo, Kevin G Lynch, Erin Niedererr, Ryan M Bremseth-Vining, Kevin Kennedy, David W Oslin","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20250192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This pilot study examined the effectiveness of high and low measurement-based care (MBC) feedback strategies for depression treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty providers at a U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs facility were randomly assigned to a no-feedback, low-feedback (automated collection and scoring of a depression self-report measure), or high-feedback (automated collection and scoring plus automated decision support) condition. Patients (N=336) completed the electronic version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 biweekly for 16 weeks. Outcomes included number of medication changes and depression symptom severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients completed 75% of the assessments. No statistically significant differences in medication changes or depression symptom severity were observed by condition. Approximately 46% of the patients received a medication change. The MBC groups had lower variability in management compared with the control group. Depression symptoms improved among all patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MBC may reduce variability in medication management; however, automated collection was insufficient. Further research is needed to support implementation of all components of MBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":520759,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)","volume":" ","pages":"appips20250192"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20250192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This pilot study examined the effectiveness of high and low measurement-based care (MBC) feedback strategies for depression treatment.

Methods: Twenty providers at a U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs facility were randomly assigned to a no-feedback, low-feedback (automated collection and scoring of a depression self-report measure), or high-feedback (automated collection and scoring plus automated decision support) condition. Patients (N=336) completed the electronic version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 biweekly for 16 weeks. Outcomes included number of medication changes and depression symptom severity.

Results: Patients completed 75% of the assessments. No statistically significant differences in medication changes or depression symptom severity were observed by condition. Approximately 46% of the patients received a medication change. The MBC groups had lower variability in management compared with the control group. Depression symptoms improved among all patients.

Conclusions: MBC may reduce variability in medication management; however, automated collection was insufficient. Further research is needed to support implementation of all components of MBC.

使用基于测量的护理告知退伍军人抗抑郁药物管理:一项试点研究。
目的:本初步研究探讨了高、低测量性护理(MBC)反馈策略在抑郁症治疗中的有效性。方法:20名美国退伍军人事务部的服务提供者被随机分配到无反馈、低反馈(自动收集和评分抑郁症自我报告测量)或高反馈(自动收集和评分加上自动决策支持)的条件下。患者(N=336)每两周完成电子版的患者健康问卷-9,持续16周。结果包括药物改变次数和抑郁症状严重程度。结果:患者完成了75%的评估。两组患者用药变化及抑郁症状严重程度差异无统计学意义。大约46%的患者接受了药物的改变。与对照组相比,MBC组在管理上的变异性较低。所有患者的抑郁症状均有所改善。结论:MBC可减少用药管理的可变性;然而,自动收集是不够的。需要进一步的研究来支持MBC的所有组成部分的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书