Late-Onset Atrioventricular Block and Significant Conduction Disturbances After Cardiac Interventions in Children.

IF 1.3
Ayse Sulu, Osman Baspinar, Derya Aydin Sahin
{"title":"Late-Onset Atrioventricular Block and Significant Conduction Disturbances After Cardiac Interventions in Children.","authors":"Ayse Sulu, Osman Baspinar, Derya Aydin Sahin","doi":"10.1111/pace.70449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Late-onset postoperative atrioventricular (AV) block is a rare condition with a reported incidence ranging between 0.3% and 0.7%, and it may be associated with high mortality rates (28%-100%). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics of pediatric patients who developed late AV block at our center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective case series, pediatric patients evaluated for permanent pacemaker implantation during the study period were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who developed late-onset (>1 month) atrioventricular block or another clinically significant conduction disturbance requiring consideration of permanent pacing following surgical, transcatheter, or electrophysiological cardiac interventions between 2007 and 2025 were included. Patients with early postoperative block (<1 month), congenital AV block, congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (CCTGA), or atrial isomerism were excluded. Demographic data, underlying congenital heart disease, type and timing of the prior intervention, symptoms at presentation, pre-block rhythm data when available, electrocardiographic and Holter findings, heart rate, type of block, temporary pacing requirement, pacemaker implantation status, and follow-up outcomes were collected from electronic medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 patients were included. The median age was 4.75 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 2.33-8.75)the mean body weight was 20.7 ± 16.8 kg. Seven patients were male. The mean age at the initial cardiac intervention was 2.17 ± 3.40 years (range: 0-12). The median interval between the index cardiac intervention and development of late conduction disease was 3.0 years (IQR: 1.75-4.62). At presentation, six patients were asymptomatic, three presented with syncope, four with signs of heart failure, and one was referred after resuscitated cardiac arrest. The index intervention was cardiac surgery in 10 patients, transcatheter structural intervention in three, and repeated AVNRT ablation in one. Nine patients had persistent complete AV block, four had intermittent complete AV block, and one had left bundle branch block with clinicallysignificantventricular pauses. Three patients had Down syndrome. Permanent pacemakers were implanted in 12 patients; one patient died after cardiac arrest, and one patient did not undergo implantation because of parental refusal. At the most recent available device interrogation, most implanted patients had a high ventricular pacing burden, generally ranging from approximately 72% to 100%, whereas two patients had low ventricular pacing burdens of approximately 1%-2% and 0.7%-2.5%, respectively CONCLUSION: Late-onset postoperative AV block is a rare but potentially fatal condition that may occur even years after cardiac interventions. Although it is most commonly observed after surgeries involving regions close to the AV node, such as atrioventricular septal defect or ventricular septal defect repair, it may also occur following atrial septal defect repair or transcatheter procedures. It may present as persistent or intermittent block. Down syndrome was observed in three patients; however, because of the small sample size, no conclusions regarding an independent association can be drawn. Routine electrocardiographic evaluation of the conduction system should be performed during follow-up after surgical, transcatheter, or ablation procedures, and additional assessments such as Holter monitoring should be considered, particularly in symptomatic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":520740,"journal":{"name":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Late-onset postoperative atrioventricular (AV) block is a rare condition with a reported incidence ranging between 0.3% and 0.7%, and it may be associated with high mortality rates (28%-100%). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics of pediatric patients who developed late AV block at our center.

Methods: In this retrospective case series, pediatric patients evaluated for permanent pacemaker implantation during the study period were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who developed late-onset (>1 month) atrioventricular block or another clinically significant conduction disturbance requiring consideration of permanent pacing following surgical, transcatheter, or electrophysiological cardiac interventions between 2007 and 2025 were included. Patients with early postoperative block (<1 month), congenital AV block, congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (CCTGA), or atrial isomerism were excluded. Demographic data, underlying congenital heart disease, type and timing of the prior intervention, symptoms at presentation, pre-block rhythm data when available, electrocardiographic and Holter findings, heart rate, type of block, temporary pacing requirement, pacemaker implantation status, and follow-up outcomes were collected from electronic medical records.

Results: A total of 14 patients were included. The median age was 4.75 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 2.33-8.75)the mean body weight was 20.7 ± 16.8 kg. Seven patients were male. The mean age at the initial cardiac intervention was 2.17 ± 3.40 years (range: 0-12). The median interval between the index cardiac intervention and development of late conduction disease was 3.0 years (IQR: 1.75-4.62). At presentation, six patients were asymptomatic, three presented with syncope, four with signs of heart failure, and one was referred after resuscitated cardiac arrest. The index intervention was cardiac surgery in 10 patients, transcatheter structural intervention in three, and repeated AVNRT ablation in one. Nine patients had persistent complete AV block, four had intermittent complete AV block, and one had left bundle branch block with clinicallysignificantventricular pauses. Three patients had Down syndrome. Permanent pacemakers were implanted in 12 patients; one patient died after cardiac arrest, and one patient did not undergo implantation because of parental refusal. At the most recent available device interrogation, most implanted patients had a high ventricular pacing burden, generally ranging from approximately 72% to 100%, whereas two patients had low ventricular pacing burdens of approximately 1%-2% and 0.7%-2.5%, respectively CONCLUSION: Late-onset postoperative AV block is a rare but potentially fatal condition that may occur even years after cardiac interventions. Although it is most commonly observed after surgeries involving regions close to the AV node, such as atrioventricular septal defect or ventricular septal defect repair, it may also occur following atrial septal defect repair or transcatheter procedures. It may present as persistent or intermittent block. Down syndrome was observed in three patients; however, because of the small sample size, no conclusions regarding an independent association can be drawn. Routine electrocardiographic evaluation of the conduction system should be performed during follow-up after surgical, transcatheter, or ablation procedures, and additional assessments such as Holter monitoring should be considered, particularly in symptomatic patients.

儿童心脏干预后迟发性房室传导阻滞和显著传导障碍。
迟发性术后房室传导阻滞是一种罕见的疾病,据报道发病率在0.3% - 0.7%之间,可能与高死亡率(28%-100%)相关。本研究的目的是评估在我们中心发生晚期房室传导阻滞的儿科患者的临床特征。方法:回顾性分析研究期间接受永久性起搏器植入的儿科患者。2007年至2025年间发生迟发性(bbb1个月)房室传导阻滞或其他临床显著的传导障碍,需要考虑在手术、经导管或电生理心脏干预后进行永久性起搏的患者纳入研究。术后早期阻滞患者(结果:共纳入14例患者。中位年龄4.75岁(四分位间距[IQR]: 2.33-8.75),平均体重20.7±16.8 kg。7例患者为男性。首次心脏干预的平均年龄为2.17±3.40岁(范围:0-12岁)。心脏干预指数与晚期传导疾病发生的中位间隔为3.0年(IQR: 1.75-4.62)。入院时,6名患者无症状,3名出现晕厥,4名有心力衰竭迹象,1名在心脏骤停复苏后转诊。指标干预为10例心脏手术,3例经导管结构干预,1例重复AVNRT消融。9例患者为持续性完全性房室传导阻滞,4例为间歇性完全性房室传导阻滞,1例为左束支传导阻滞伴临床显著心室暂停。三名患者患有唐氏综合症。植入永久性起搏器12例;1例患者因心脏骤停死亡,1例患者因父母拒绝而未进行植入术。在最近可获得的设备调查中,大多数植入患者的心室起搏负担较高,一般在约72%至100%之间,而2例患者的心室起搏负担较低,分别约为1%-2%和0.7%-2.5%。结论:迟发性术后房室传导阻滞是一种罕见但潜在致命的疾病,可能在心脏干预后数年发生。虽然它最常见于靠近房室结的区域的手术后,如房室间隔缺损或室间隔缺损修复,但也可能发生在房间隔缺损修复或经导管手术后。它可以表现为持续的或间歇性的传导阻滞。唐氏综合征3例;然而,由于样本量小,无法得出关于独立关联的结论。在手术、经导管或消融术后的随访中,应进行常规的传导系统心电图评估,并应考虑其他评估,如动态心电图监测,特别是在有症状的患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书