From vivarium to NAM-centred laboratory: A practical framework for managing infrastructure, expertise and organisational transition.

NAM journal Pub Date : 2026-09-07 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.namjnl.2026.100129
Clive Roper, Michael D Coleman
{"title":"From vivarium to NAM-centred laboratory: A practical framework for managing infrastructure, expertise and organisational transition.","authors":"Clive Roper, Michael D Coleman","doi":"10.1016/j.namjnl.2026.100129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Political, Regulatory and Scientific developments are propelling the use of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) across regulatory toxicology and drug development, creating challenges for organisations operating animal-testing facilities. High clinical attrition rates driven by lack of efficacy and toxicity continue to stimulate interest in more human-predictive approaches. The FDA Modernization Acts and UK and EU initiatives to phase out animal testing are also influencing future testing strategies. Universities, pharmaceutical companies and contract research organisations (CROs) have made substantial investments in facilities, equipment, support services and highly skilled personnel. Increasing adoption of NAMs forces existing infrastructure redevelopment, whilst preserving capital investment and retaining/repurposing scientific expertise. A practical framework is presented for organisations transitioning from animal-based testing towards NAM-centred operations, addressing infrastructure redevelopment, workforce transition, expertise retention and capital investment preservation. Infrastructure requirements, support services, workforce development, business sustainability and role-specific staff retraining are examined. Retaining institutional knowledge and recognising the continuing value of technical, scientific and regulatory expertise developed through animal-testing programmes as organisations transition towards NAMs are prioritised. Contexts of Use (CoUs) and Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) help connect historical animal-study knowledge with future NAM applications. Successful transition is presented as a managed organisational process involving people, infrastructure, knowledge and investment rather than simply the replacement of one experimental model with another.</p>","PeriodicalId":520522,"journal":{"name":"NAM journal","volume":"2 ","pages":"100129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13597276/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NAM journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.namjnl.2026.100129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Political, Regulatory and Scientific developments are propelling the use of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) across regulatory toxicology and drug development, creating challenges for organisations operating animal-testing facilities. High clinical attrition rates driven by lack of efficacy and toxicity continue to stimulate interest in more human-predictive approaches. The FDA Modernization Acts and UK and EU initiatives to phase out animal testing are also influencing future testing strategies. Universities, pharmaceutical companies and contract research organisations (CROs) have made substantial investments in facilities, equipment, support services and highly skilled personnel. Increasing adoption of NAMs forces existing infrastructure redevelopment, whilst preserving capital investment and retaining/repurposing scientific expertise. A practical framework is presented for organisations transitioning from animal-based testing towards NAM-centred operations, addressing infrastructure redevelopment, workforce transition, expertise retention and capital investment preservation. Infrastructure requirements, support services, workforce development, business sustainability and role-specific staff retraining are examined. Retaining institutional knowledge and recognising the continuing value of technical, scientific and regulatory expertise developed through animal-testing programmes as organisations transition towards NAMs are prioritised. Contexts of Use (CoUs) and Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) help connect historical animal-study knowledge with future NAM applications. Successful transition is presented as a managed organisational process involving people, infrastructure, knowledge and investment rather than simply the replacement of one experimental model with another.

从动物实验室到以nami为中心的实验室:管理基础设施、专业知识和组织过渡的实用框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书