A blended problem-based learning/case-based learning/artificial intelligence teaching model for medical laboratory technology interns: a quasi-experimental study.

IF 1
Qin Lu, Chunmei Li, Ning Feng, Fanting Zeng, Shoukun Wang, Guangshun Ma
{"title":"A blended problem-based learning/case-based learning/artificial intelligence teaching model for medical laboratory technology interns: a quasi-experimental study.","authors":"Qin Lu, Chunmei Li, Ning Feng, Fanting Zeng, Shoukun Wang, Guangshun Ma","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmag065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The 1-year clinical practicum in China's 4-year medical laboratory technology (MLT) program often fails to bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and clinical practice. This study evaluated the effect of a blended learning model that integrated problem-based learning (PBL), case-based learning (CBL), and artificial intelligence (AI) on clinical training outcomes among MLT interns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 77 MLT interns (August 2024-April 2026) were assigned to a control group (traditional lecture-based teaching, n = 38) or an intervention group (blended PBL/CBL/AI teaching, n = 39). Objective outcomes were measured by phased theoretical and practical skills tests; subjective outcomes were collected through questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No baseline differences were found between groups (all P > .05). The intervention group scored statistically significantly higher in theoretical knowledge (mean [SD], 77.15 [8.51] vs 71.55 [8.12]; P = .004) and practical skills (mean [SD], 70.38 [12.27] vs. 64.08 [9.58]; P = .02) and reported higher satisfaction across all 12 teaching dimensions (P < .05). In AI-integrated teaching, the intervention group showed higher satisfaction in 5 of 6 dimensions, particularly in ease of use (P < .001), except for question-posing ability (P = .40).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The blended PBL/CBL/AI internship model substantially enhanced theoretical knowledge, practical skills, and student satisfaction. Despite the limitations of its single-center design and small sample size, this model provides a valuable reference for internship reform.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":"57 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmag065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The 1-year clinical practicum in China's 4-year medical laboratory technology (MLT) program often fails to bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and clinical practice. This study evaluated the effect of a blended learning model that integrated problem-based learning (PBL), case-based learning (CBL), and artificial intelligence (AI) on clinical training outcomes among MLT interns.

Methods: A total of 77 MLT interns (August 2024-April 2026) were assigned to a control group (traditional lecture-based teaching, n = 38) or an intervention group (blended PBL/CBL/AI teaching, n = 39). Objective outcomes were measured by phased theoretical and practical skills tests; subjective outcomes were collected through questionnaires.

Results: No baseline differences were found between groups (all P > .05). The intervention group scored statistically significantly higher in theoretical knowledge (mean [SD], 77.15 [8.51] vs 71.55 [8.12]; P = .004) and practical skills (mean [SD], 70.38 [12.27] vs. 64.08 [9.58]; P = .02) and reported higher satisfaction across all 12 teaching dimensions (P < .05). In AI-integrated teaching, the intervention group showed higher satisfaction in 5 of 6 dimensions, particularly in ease of use (P < .001), except for question-posing ability (P = .40).

Discussion: The blended PBL/CBL/AI internship model substantially enhanced theoretical knowledge, practical skills, and student satisfaction. Despite the limitations of its single-center design and small sample size, this model provides a valuable reference for internship reform.

基于问题的学习/基于案例的学习/人工智能的医学实验室实习生混合教学模式:准实验研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书