Validating Administrative Data Markers for Elder Abuse Identification via Chart Review in a National Health System.

IF 4.5
Joseph Shin, Hongwei Zhang, Maria K Mor, Tony Rosen, Naomi Shin, Lena K Makaroun
{"title":"Validating Administrative Data Markers for Elder Abuse Identification via Chart Review in a National Health System.","authors":"Joseph Shin, Hongwei Zhang, Maria K Mor, Tony Rosen, Naomi Shin, Lena K Makaroun","doi":"10.1111/jgs.70738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elder abuse (EA) is a serious public health concern that is dramatically under-documented in electronic health records (EHRs). Although structured EHR markers for EA are commonly used in research to identify EA cases in large cohorts due to their accessibility, their validity for capturing clinical EA concerns is unknown.</p><p><strong>Participants and setting: </strong>Of 3,724,639 Veterans aged ≥ 60 years with an outpatient Veterans Health Administration (VHA) encounter in 2022, 8161 (0.2%) had an EA-related ICD-10 code and/or a structured social work consult marker for \"abuse/neglect\" recorded in the EHR that year. From the 7382 with complete race/ethnicity data, we randomly sampled 105 veterans for review, intentionally oversampling women and racial/ethnic minority groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective chart review, systematically abstracting clinical notes within ±180 days of the structured EA marker to assess the positive predictive value (PPV) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) against a reference standard of documented active clinical EA concerns in free text notes. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the sample and documentation patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 14 of 105 veterans (PPV [95% CI] 13.3% [7.5-21.4]) had free-text documentation of active clinical EA concern: 9 of 77 (11.7% [5.5-21.0]) with a social work consult marker, 4 of 27 (14.8% [4.2-33.7]) with an ICD-10 code, and 1 of 1 (100% [2.5-100.0]) with both. Among the 91 veterans without documented concern, 20 had documentation of historical abuse only (e.g., military sexual trauma), while the remainder had no clear explanation for the administrative marker.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Structured EA data markers in the VHA EHR rarely corresponded to free-text documentation of active clinical EA concern, raising important questions about their validity as proxies for EA identification. These findings underscore the need for developing standardized, clinician-friendly approaches to EA documentation in EHRs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Elder abuse (EA) is a serious public health concern that is dramatically under-documented in electronic health records (EHRs). Although structured EHR markers for EA are commonly used in research to identify EA cases in large cohorts due to their accessibility, their validity for capturing clinical EA concerns is unknown.

Participants and setting: Of 3,724,639 Veterans aged ≥ 60 years with an outpatient Veterans Health Administration (VHA) encounter in 2022, 8161 (0.2%) had an EA-related ICD-10 code and/or a structured social work consult marker for "abuse/neglect" recorded in the EHR that year. From the 7382 with complete race/ethnicity data, we randomly sampled 105 veterans for review, intentionally oversampling women and racial/ethnic minority groups.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review, systematically abstracting clinical notes within ±180 days of the structured EA marker to assess the positive predictive value (PPV) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) against a reference standard of documented active clinical EA concerns in free text notes. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the sample and documentation patterns.

Results: Only 14 of 105 veterans (PPV [95% CI] 13.3% [7.5-21.4]) had free-text documentation of active clinical EA concern: 9 of 77 (11.7% [5.5-21.0]) with a social work consult marker, 4 of 27 (14.8% [4.2-33.7]) with an ICD-10 code, and 1 of 1 (100% [2.5-100.0]) with both. Among the 91 veterans without documented concern, 20 had documentation of historical abuse only (e.g., military sexual trauma), while the remainder had no clear explanation for the administrative marker.

Conclusions: Structured EA data markers in the VHA EHR rarely corresponded to free-text documentation of active clinical EA concern, raising important questions about their validity as proxies for EA identification. These findings underscore the need for developing standardized, clinician-friendly approaches to EA documentation in EHRs.

通过国家卫生系统的图表审查来验证虐待老人识别的行政数据标记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书